Properties of high yield synthesised carbon nano fibres/Portland cement composite
Source abstract
Abstract
The compressive strength and electrical resistivity of hardened pastes produced either from nanomodified Portland sulfate-resistant cement (CHH) or a mixture of nanomodified and pristine sulfate-resistant cements were determined. The nanomodification included grow carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and carbon nanofibres (CNFs) on the cement particles. Pastes having a water-to-binder ratio of 0·5 were produced. The test results revealed that partial replacement of sulfate-resistant cement by CHH cement decreased the electrical resistivity of the 28 day old specimens but worsened the mechanical properties. The lower compressive strength was attributed to a lower degree of hydration of the CHH cement. The addition of a mixture of surfactants enabled the production of specimens consisting entirely of CHH cement. The hardened material obtained was characterised by a nearly doubled compressive strength in comparison with the reference specimens made from pristine sulfate-resistant cement. This was attributed to a high degree of hydration as well as reinforcing action of the CNTs and CNFs. The electrical resistivity was lowered by one order of magnitude classifying this material as a semiconductor.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Materials for Construction · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Advanced Energy Technologies and Civil Engineering Innovations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory of Building Materials Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Helsinki University of Technology; Laboratory of Physics and Center for New Materials, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/354056a010.1038/354056a0 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10832-006-9935-810.1007/s10832-006-9935-8 ↗
3. 10.1002/adem.20050025610.1002/adem.200500256 ↗
4. 10.1680/adcr.2008.20.2.6510.1680/adcr.2008.20.2.65 ↗
5. Kowlad T. · 2004 · 195
6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.1310410.1103/PhysRevB.62.13104 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.12.01110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.12.011 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0009-2614(02)01496-310.1016/S0009-2614(02)01496-3 ↗
9. Yury Q. · Applied Physics Letters · 79 · 1021
10. 10.1557/JMR.1998.033810.1557/JMR.1998.0338 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.1996008021210.1002/adma.19960080212 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.05.10410.1016/j.polymer.2005.05.104 ↗
13. 10.1021/ma049681z10.1021/ma049681z ↗
14. Makar J. M. · 246
15. 10.1088/0953-8984/15/42/00310.1088/0953-8984/15/42/003 ↗
16. 10.1016/0008-8846(89)90079-310.1016/0008-8846(89)90079-3 ↗
17. 10.1680/cc.2592910.1680/cc.25929 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0008-8846(97)00008-210.1016/S0008-8846(97)00008-2 ↗
19. Scrivener K. L. · 1987 · 61