Decreased Synthesis Costs and Waste Product Toxicity for Lead Sulfide Quantum Dot Ink Photovoltaics
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Use of lead sulfide (PbS) colloidal quantum dot (QD) films as photoactive layers in photovoltaic (PV) devices typically requires replacement of native QD ligands with lead‐based capping ligands (i.e., PbX2, X = Br, I) for the best‐performing QD PVs. This ligand replacement process often requires additional solvents and toxic reagents. In the present study, an alternative PbS QD PV fabrication method with a lead‐free tetrabutylammonium iodide (TBAI) ligand source and lower material requirements and toxicity is demonstrated, yielding 10% power conversion efficient PVs with more than 1000 h of storage stability under ambient conditions. Evaluation of the economic and toxicological benefits of this new ligand exchange protocol reveals a 72% reduction in synthesis costs, an 80% reduction in solvent volumes, and a nearly 250‐fold reduction in lead waste generated compared to the previous PbX2‐based protocol for highest‐performing QD PVs. Most significantly, it is shown that unencapsulated PbS QD PVs made from this TBAI method leach less lead than U.S. Environmental Protection Agency limits and thus do not require hazardous waste disposal at the end of life. This finding implies a further decrease in expected device costs, extending progress toward large‐scale production of commercial PbS QD PVs with low environmental risk.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA 02139 USA
Department of Physics Wellesley College Wellesley MA 02481 USA
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA 02139 USA
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41565-018-0117-z10.1038/s41565-018-0117-z ↗
2. 10.1038/nmat480010.1038/nmat4800 ↗
3. 10.1039/C8EE00278A10.1039/C8EE00278A ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20160575610.1002/adma.201605756 ↗
5. 10.1039/C5EE03887A10.1039/C5EE03887A ↗
6. 10.1038/nmat398410.1038/nmat3984 ↗
7. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.54510.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.545 ↗
8. Jean J. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2018 · 13 · 456
9. 10.1038/ncomms1173510.1038/ncomms11735 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.04.03710.1016/j.solmat.2016.04.037 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.joule.2017.10.01010.1016/j.joule.2017.10.010 ↗
12. 10.1021/jz300048y10.1021/jz300048y ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20150115610.1002/adma.201501156 ↗
14. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Fed. Regist. · 1990 · 55 · 11798
15. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · 1992
16. Toxicity Characteristic 40 C.F.R. § 261.242011.
17. National Research Council (US) Committee on Prudent Practices in the Laboratory · 2011
18. K.Davey N.Hummel P2 Cost Calculator https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017‐06/p2_cost_calculator_apr‐13‐2017.xlsm(accessed: April2019).
19. Off. J. Eur. Union · 2011 · 54 · 88