Construction of Sabatier Volcanoes for CO 2 Hydrogenation to C1‐2 Oxygenates Using Data‐Efficient Machine Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT The development of technologies for CO 2 hydrogenation to valuable chemicals is prioritized globally due to their potential for large‐scale CO 2 abatement. However, rational design of catalysts for this reaction is hindered by an incomplete understanding of the complex reaction network of CO 2 hydrogenation. This study addresses this gap by establishing a data‐ and computation‐efficient framework for CO 2 hydrogenation to C1‐2 oxygenates on ≈ 1.2 nm large Au, fcc‐Co, Cu, Ni, Pd, Pt, and Rh nanoparticles. The obtained reaction networks could not be described using Brønsted‐Evans‐Polanyi relationships with sufficient accuracy, motivating the use of a nonlinear NN model for inference of activation energies. A pathfinder ‐like algorithm and an energetic span model are used to analyse these networks and to construct Sabatier volcano plots identifying optimal binding properties for a promising catalyst. The analysis indicates that efficient C2 oxygenate formation simultaneously requires CH x formation, favorable C–C coupling and efficient protonation, as well as suppression of methanation and poisoning by CO, alcoholates, and carboxylates. These features are mutually exclusive on the studied monometallic nanoparticles, suggesting that multicomponent and multimetallic catalysts are more realistic design targets. This framework supports computational discovery of CO 2 hydrogenation catalysts challenged by data limitations and mechanistic complexity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Catalysts for Methane Reforming · CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 4 Engineering Drive 4 National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore
Funding
National Research Foundation Singapore
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0275810.1021/acscatal.7b02758 ↗
2. 10.1002/anie.20161221410.1002/anie.201612214 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41929‐022‐00760‐z10.1038/s41929‐022‐00760‐z ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b0068810.1021/acs.jctc.7b00688 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41524‐018‐0065‐z10.1038/s41524‐018‐0065‐z ↗
6. 10.1039/D1CP00044F10.1039/D1CP00044F ↗
7. Towards Operando Computational Modeling in Heterogeneous Catalysis10.1039/C8CS00398J ↗
8. 10.1038/ncomms1462110.1038/ncomms14621 ↗
9. 10.1039/D0TA06203K10.1039/D0TA06203K ↗
10. Machine Learning for Catalysis Informatics: Recent Applications and Prospects10.1021/acscatal.9b04186 ↗
11. 10.1021/acscentsci.0c0042610.1021/acscentsci.0c00426 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c0401810.1021/acs.jpcc.4c04018 ↗
13. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0029010.1021/acscatal.7b00290 ↗
14. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0170810.1021/acscatal.8b01708 ↗
15. 10.1002/cctc.20190059510.1002/cctc.201900595 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c0005810.1021/acs.accounts.2c00058 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41929‐022‐00896‐y10.1038/s41929‐022‐00896‐y ↗
18. 10.1039/D0CS00025F10.1039/D0CS00025F ↗
19. Recent Advances in Integrated CO2 Capture and Utilization: A Review″ Sustainaible
20. 10.1039/c1em90013g10.1039/c1em90013g ↗
21. 10.1007/s11356‐023‐30483‐y10.1007/s11356‐023‐30483‐y ↗
22. 10.1038/s41586‐024‐08078‐510.1038/s41586‐024‐08078‐5 ↗
23. CO2 Hydrogenation over Fe‐Co Bimetallic Catalysts with Tunable Selectivity through a Graphene Fencing Approach
24. Data Analysis of CO2 Hydrogenation Catalysts for Hydrocarbon Production10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102034 ↗
25. 10.1021/acscatal.3c0058610.1021/acscatal.3c00586 ↗
26. 10.1002/wcms.153010.1002/wcms.1530 ↗
27. A. M.Verma S.Chaturvedi S.Paul et al. Data‐driven Massive Reaction Networks Reveal New Pathways Underlying Catalytic CO2Hydrogenation (May2025) https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv‐2025‐pnh6l.10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-pnh6l ↗
28. 10.1002/wcms.110010.1002/wcms.1100 ↗
29. 10.1039/D5EY00338E10.1039/D5EY00338E ↗
30. 10.1007/s10562‐010‐0477‐y10.1007/s10562‐010‐0477‐y ↗
31. 10.1039/c1cp20547a10.1039/c1cp20547a ↗
32. 10.1039/c3cp44088e10.1039/c3cp44088e ↗
33. Generalized Brønsted‐Evans‐Polanyi Relationships for Reactions on Metal Surfaces from Machine Learning10.1002/cctc.202201108 ↗
34. L.Prokhorenkova G.Gusev A.Vorobev andA. V.Dorogush presented atAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31(2018).
35. Squeeze‐and‐Excitation Networks10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2913372 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c0113610.1021/acs.jcim.2c01136 ↗
37. A Review of Mechanistic Insights into CO2 Reduction to Higher Alcohols for Rational Catalyst Design10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123550 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jcat.2014.12.03310.1016/j.jcat.2014.12.033 ↗
39. 10.1021/acscatal.1c0263010.1021/acscatal.1c02630 ↗
40. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0020110.1021/acscatal.8b00201 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.apcata.2024.12008610.1016/j.apcata.2024.120086 ↗
42. Towards the Computational Design of Solid Catalysts10.1038/nchem.121 ↗
43. 10.1016/0926‐860X(95)00049‐610.1016/0926‐860X(95)00049‐6 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.11.04310.1016/j.apcatb.2011.11.043 ↗
45. Optimizing Reaction Paths for Methanol Synthesis from CO2 Hydrogenation via Metal‐ligand Cooperativity
46. CO2 Hydrogenation to Ethanol over Cu@Na‐Beta10.1016/j.chempr.2020.07.001 ↗
47. 10.1021/jacs.0c0860710.1021/jacs.0c08607 ↗
48. 10.1016/0920‐5861(95)00246‐410.1016/0920‐5861(95)00246‐4 ↗
49. 10.1007/s11426‐019‐9590‐610.1007/s11426‐019‐9590‐6 ↗
50. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0039410.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00394 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jechem.2026.01.05310.1016/j.jechem.2026.01.053 ↗
52. Highly Active and Selective Hydrogenation of CO2 to Ethanol by Ordered Pd‐Cu Nanoparticles10.1021/jacs.7b03101 ↗
53. 10.1007/s10562‐020‐03355‐010.1007/s10562‐020‐03355‐0 ↗
54. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.89010.1103/PhysRevLett.80.890 ↗
55. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
56. A Consistent and Accurate Ab Initio Parametrization of Density Functional Dispersion Correction (DFT‐D) for the 94 Elements H‐Pu10.1063/1.3382344 ↗
57. 10.1002/jcc.2175910.1002/jcc.21759 ↗
58. The Optimally Performing Fischer–Tropsch Catalyst10.1002/anie.201406521 ↗
59. 10.1038/s41592‐019‐0686‐210.1038/s41592‐019‐0686‐2 ↗
60. 10.1038/s41586‐020‐2649‐210.1038/s41586‐020‐2649‐2 ↗
61. Scikit‐learn: Machine Learning in Python
62. W.McKinneyinProceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference(Eds:S.van derWalt andJ.Millman) (2010):56–61 https://doi.org/10.25080/Majora‐92bf1922‐00a.10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a ↗
63. A. A.Hagberg D. A.Schult andP. J.Swartpresented atProceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference(Eds:G.Varoquaux T.Vaught andJ.Millman) (2008):16.
64. M.Abadi P.Barham andJ.Chen andZ.Chenpresented at12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation USENIX Association Savannah GA (2016) 265–283.
65. 10.1016/j.cpc.2019.10694910.1016/j.cpc.2019.106949 ↗
66. 10.1186/1758‐2946‐4‐1710.1186/1758‐2946‐4‐17 ↗
67. M. V.PolynskiandS. M.Kozlov “ML‐driven CO2Hydrogenation Reaction Network Analysis GitHub” https://github.com/Computational‐Nanocatalysis‐Group/ML‐driven_reaction_network_analysis_tools_CO2_hydrogenation(Accessed: June 10 2026).