AI‐Physics‐Experiment Trinity for Integrated Protein Dynamics Modeling
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Proteins exist as conformational ensembles, with dynamic transitions governing biological processes. Deciphering these dynamics demands integrating experimental data, physics‐based simulations, and artificial intelligence (AI)—each with distinct strengths and limitations. Experiments deliver direct structural and dynamic benchmarks but are often constrained by insufficient spatiotemporal resolution or difficulties with providing information on transiently and weakly populated states. Physics‐based methods may generate atomic‐scale trajectories via force fields yet face sampling bottlenecks, force field sensitivity, and the curse of dimensionality. AI, particularly deep learning and generative modeling approaches, facilitates the efficient prediction of protein structures and conformational ensembles, as well as dimensionality reduction, yet is hindered by limited interpretability and transferability, and a scarcity of high‐quality ground‐truth data for training and benchmarking models of dynamics. This review outlines core principles of standalone approaches and highlights integrative strategies: experimental constraints guide physics‐driven refinement; AI enhances experimental processing and ensemble generation; physics imparts plausibility to AI, while AI accelerates simulation sampling and force field optimization. We elaborate on this synergy, emphasizing physics‐based modeling's glue‐like role in reconciling heterogeneous datasets. Finally, we summarize persistent challenges and discuss future directions for integrated modeling of protein dynamics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Protein Structure and Dynamics · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Enzyme Structure and Function
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Life Sciences & Department of Engineering Mechanics Zhejiang University Hangzhou China
Linderstrøm‐Lang Centre for Protein Science Department of Biology University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
The Provincial International Science and Technology Cooperation Base on Engineering Biology International Campus of Zhejiang University Haining Zhejiang China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.174993310.1126/science.1749933 ↗
2. 10.1146/annurev.bb.17.060188.00231510.1146/annurev.bb.17.060188.002315 ↗
3. 10.1039/D3CB00114H10.1039/D3CB00114H ↗
4. 10.1038/nature0652210.1038/nature06522 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.121902110.1126/science.1219021 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.788644710.1126/science.7886447 ↗
7. 10.1038/nchembio.56510.1038/nchembio.565 ↗
8. 10.1146/annurev.physchem.48.1.54510.1146/annurev.physchem.48.1.545 ↗
9. 10.1073/pnas.89.18.872110.1073/pnas.89.18.8721 ↗
10. 10.1002/prot.34021030210.1002/prot.340210302 ↗
11. 10.1073/pnas.44.2.9810.1073/pnas.44.2.98 ↗
12. 10.1073/pnas.040893010210.1073/pnas.0408930102 ↗
13. 10.1111/j.1749‐6632.1981.tb50581.x10.1111/j.1749‐6632.1981.tb50581.x ↗
14. 10.1021/bi00483a00110.1021/bi00483a001 ↗
15. 10.1038/nsb0902‐64610.1038/nsb0902‐646 ↗
16. 10.1038/nmeth.369410.1038/nmeth.3694 ↗
17. 10.1126/science.125165210.1126/science.1251652 ↗
18. 10.1126/science.aat434610.1126/science.aat4346 ↗
19. 10.1145/1364782.136480210.1145/1364782.1364802 ↗
20. 10.1371/journal.pone.003213110.1371/journal.pone.0032131 ↗
21. Generative Modeling of Molecular Dynamics Trajectories10.52202/079017-1282 ↗
22. 10.3390/biochem503003210.3390/biochem5030032 ↗
23. 10.1021/cr030413t10.1021/cr030413t ↗
24. 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.08.02710.1016/j.febslet.2015.08.027 ↗
25. 10.2174/13892031279927790110.2174/138920312799277901 ↗
26. 10.1063/5.030718310.1063/5.0307183 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.10.00810.1016/j.tibs.2015.10.008 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41592‐019‐0459‐y10.1038/s41592‐019‐0459‐y ↗
29. 10.1146/annurev‐physchem‐032511‐14371610.1146/annurev‐physchem‐032511‐143716 ↗
30. 10.1038/nmeth.120810.1038/nmeth.1208 ↗
31. 10.1126/science.aan113310.1126/science.aan1133 ↗
32. 10.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.10461410.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.104614 ↗
33. 10.1002/anie.19900992110.1002/anie.199009921 ↗
34. 10.1051/sfn/20111200910.1051/sfn/201112009 ↗
35. 10.33011/livecoms.6.1.387110.33011/livecoms.6.1.3871 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.01110.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.011 ↗
37. 10.1007/978-1-59745-177-2_210.1007/978-1-59745-177-2_2 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b0633510.1021/acs.jpcb.8b06335 ↗
39. Leach A. R. · 2001
40. Frenkel D. · 2023
41. 10.1002/jcc.2029110.1002/jcc.20291 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.00110.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c0666210.1021/acs.jpcb.3c06662 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10817110.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
45. 10.1002/jcc.2029010.1002/jcc.20290 ↗
46. 10.1002/jcc.2128710.1002/jcc.21287 ↗
47. 10.1002/jcc.2028910.1002/jcc.20289 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.10.01910.1016/j.bbagen.2014.10.019 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0016310.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00163 ↗
50. 10.1038/s41592‐021‐01098‐310.1038/s41592‐021‐01098‐3 ↗
51. 10.1073/pnas.130838111010.1073/pnas.1308381110 ↗
52. 10.1021/ja304566310.1021/ja3045663 ↗
53. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.369310.1006/jmbi.2000.3693 ↗
54. 10.33011/livecoms.4.1.158310.33011/livecoms.4.1.1583 ↗
55. 10.1016/0021‐9991(77)90121‐810.1016/0021‐9991(77)90121‐8 ↗
56. 10.1002/wcms.3110.1002/wcms.31 ↗
57. 10.1063/1.502467910.1063/1.5024679 ↗
58. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0049710.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00497 ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c0025410.1021/acs.jctc.3c00254 ↗
60. 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c0080610.1021/acs.jctc.2c00806 ↗
61. 10.1063/1.282561410.1063/1.2825614 ↗
62. 10.1063/1.282986110.1063/1.2829861 ↗
63. 10.1021/acs.accounts.5c0066610.1021/acs.accounts.5c00666 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.04103410.1103/PhysRevX.10.041034 ↗
65. 10.1146/annurev‐physchem‐083122‐12594110.1146/annurev‐physchem‐083122‐125941 ↗
66. 10.1016/S0009‐2614(99)01123‐910.1016/S0009‐2614(99)01123‐9 ↗
67. 10.3390/e1601016310.3390/e16010163 ↗
68. 10.1146/annurev.physchem.53.082301.11314610.1146/annurev.physchem.53.082301.113146 ↗
69. 10.1063/1.356503210.1063/1.3565032 ↗
70. 10.1146/annurev‐biophys‐121219‐08152810.1146/annurev‐biophys‐121219‐081528 ↗
71. 10.1002/wcms.151210.1002/wcms.1512 ↗
72. 10.1146/annurev‐biophys‐070816‐03383410.1146/annurev‐biophys‐070816‐033834 ↗
73. 10.1063/5.011087310.1063/5.0110873 ↗
74. 10.1063/1.510953110.1063/1.5109531 ↗
75. 10.1038/s41586‐023‐06415‐810.1038/s41586‐023‐06415‐8 ↗
76. 10.1126/science.add218710.1126/science.add2187 ↗
77. T.Geffner K.Didi Z.Cao et al. “La‐Proteina: Atomistic Protein Generation via Partially Latent Flow Matching ” preprint arXiv July 13 2025 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.09466.
78. O.Zhang X.Zhang H.Lin et al. “A World Model for Biomolecular Interaction Design ” preprint arXiv October 28 2025 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.22304.
79. 10.1146/annurev‐biodatasci‐102423‐01143510.1146/annurev‐biodatasci‐102423‐011435 ↗
80. 10.1038/s41586‐021‐03819‐210.1038/s41586‐021‐03819‐2 ↗
81. 10.1038/s41586‐024‐07487‐w10.1038/s41586‐024‐07487‐w ↗
82. J.Butcher R.Krishna R.Mitra et al. “De Novo Design of All‐Atom Biomolecular Interactions with RFdiffusion3 ”preprint bioRxiv(2025) https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.18.676967.10.1101/2025.09.18.676967 ↗
83. 10.1093/bib/bbaf34010.1093/bib/bbaf340 ↗
84. 10.1038/s42256‐026‐01220‐010.1038/s42256‐026‐01220‐0 ↗
85. 10.1126/science.ade257410.1126/science.ade2574 ↗
86. 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c0025510.1021/acs.jctc.4c00255 ↗
87. 10.1093/nar/28.1.23510.1093/nar/28.1.235 ↗
88. 10.1073/pnas.051115610310.1073/pnas.0511156103 ↗
89. 10.1093/nar/gku104710.1093/nar/gku1047 ↗
90. 10.1063/4.000089110.1063/4.0000891 ↗
91. 10.1007/s12551‐024‐01197‐310.1007/s12551‐024‐01197‐3 ↗
92. 10.1016/j.str.2010.07.01310.1016/j.str.2010.07.013 ↗
93. 10.1016/j.str.2010.01.01210.1016/j.str.2010.01.012 ↗
94. 10.1093/nar/gkad108410.1093/nar/gkad1084 ↗
95. 10.1038/s41597‐024‐04140‐z10.1038/s41597‐024‐04140‐z ↗
96. 10.1093/nar/gkaf113010.1093/nar/gkaf1130 ↗
97. Y.Zhou C.Wei M.Sun et al. “ProteinConformers: Large‐Scale and Energetically Profiled Descriptions of Protein Conformational Landscapes ” preprint bioRxiv February 20 2026 https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.02.20.707011.10.7554/eLife.110874.1 ↗
98. D. E.Shaw R. O.Dror J. K.Salmon et al. “Millisecond‐Scale Molecular Dynamics Simulations on Anton ” inProceedings of the Conference on High Performance Computing Networking Storage and Analysis SC'09 (Association for Computing Machinery 2009) 1–11 https://doi.org/10.1145/1654059.1654126.10.1145/1654059.1654126 ↗
99. 10.1093/nar/gkab106110.1093/nar/gkab1061 ↗
100. J.Yeo Y.Han N.Bordin et al. “Metagenomic‐Scale Analysis of the Predicted Protein Structure Universe ” preprint bioRxiv March 16 2026 https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.23.650224.10.1101/2025.04.23.650224 ↗