journal article·2026-06-03Open access

Sparse Pd–Te Covalent Bridges Drive Anomalous Bulk‐to‐Monolayer Electronic and Magnetic Evolution in FePd 2 Te 2

Huaiyuan Zhao, Jianwen Fang, Mohan Luo, Yinuo Ye, Yulin Wang, Jianhui Yang, Hongwen Zhang, Peng Cheng

Abstract

ABSTRACT Non‐van‐der‐Waals (non‐vdW) layered magnets provide bonding degrees of freedom beyond dispersion‐dominated stacks, yet how dilute interlayer covalent bridges influence bulk‐to‐monolayer evolution remains insufficiently understood. Using first‐principles calculations, we investigate FePd 2 Te 2 (FPT), a layered ferromagnet with sparse interlayer Pd─Te bridges. These bridges exhibit a covalent component, while the cleavage energy remains in the vdW‐like range (∼0.51 J·m −2 ), establishing FPT as an exfoliable non‐vdW layered magnet. Upon thinning from bulk to monolayer, local Fe moments and intralayer exchange terms increase slightly, whereas the Curie temperature decreases from 173 to 27 K. Analysis of multiplicity‐weighted exchange contributions indicates that this suppression of T C is governed primarily by the weakening and eventual disappearance of interlayer ferromagnetic exchange J 3 , with enhanced antiferromagnetic competition from J 2 providing an additional destabilizing contribution. Meanwhile, orbital reorganization near the Fermi level sustains a relatively large easy‐plane magnetocrystalline anisotropy (∼1.86 meV per Fe in bulk) with a moderate enhancement (∼8.6%) in the monolayer, gives rise to a dimensionality‐dependent reversal of magnetoelastic response under biaxial strain, and leaves the near‐E F spin polarization comparatively robust up to ±5% strain. These results identify FPT as a representative exfoliable non‐vdW magnet and clarify how sparse interlayer covalent bridges govern its thickness‐dependent magnetic evolution.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · 2D Materials and Applications · Iron-based superconductors research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Quzhou University Quzhou P. R. China

Key Laboratory of Advanced Fuel Cells and Electrolyzers Technology of Zhejiang Province Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering Chinese Academy of Sciences Ningbo Zhejiang P. R. China

Key Lab of Materials Physics Anhui Key Lab of Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology Institute of Solid State Physics HFIPS Chinese Academy of Sciences Hefei P. R. China

Beijing Key Laboratory of Opto‐electronic Functional Materials & Micro‐Nano Devices School of Physics Renmin University of China Beijing P. R. China

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.aac943910.1126/science.aac9439 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41586‐018‐0631‐z10.1038/s41586‐018‐0631‐z ↗
3. 10.1002/adfm.20250945310.1002/adfm.202509453 ↗
4. 10.1038/nature2206010.1038/nature22060 ↗
5. 10.1038/nature2239110.1038/nature22391 ↗
6. Ferromagnetism Near Room Temperature in the Cleavable van der Waals Crystal Fe5GeTe210.1021/acsnano.8b09660 ↗
7. Suppression of Magnetic Ordering in XXZ‐type Antiferromagnetic Monolayer NiPS310.1038/s41467-018-08284-6 ↗
8. 10.1002/adfm.20241117010.1002/adfm.202411170 ↗
9. Rationally Designed High‐Performance Spin‐Filter Based on Two‐Dimensional Half‐Metal Cr2NO210.1016/j.matt.2019.07.022 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.21441010.1103/PhysRevB.104.214410 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.13680510.1103/PhysRevLett.105.136805 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41563‐018‐0040‐610.1038/s41563‐018‐0040‐6 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsnano.4c0117710.1021/acsnano.4c01177 ↗
14. 10.1021/jacs.4c0491010.1021/jacs.4c04910 ↗
15. 10.1021/jacs.5c0428410.1021/jacs.5c04284 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsnano.5c1206710.1021/acsnano.5c12067 ↗
17. 10.1103/cbyr‐vwlw10.1103/cbyr‐vwlw ↗
18. 10.1039/C5TC02840J10.1039/C5TC02840J ↗
19. 10.1002/pssr.20180041010.1002/pssr.201800410 ↗
20. 10.1039/C8NR03230K10.1039/C8NR03230K ↗
21. 10.1039/C5CP04835D10.1039/C5CP04835D ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0479410.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04794 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.22442910.1103/PhysRevB.100.224429 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.03540710.1103/PhysRevB.92.035407 ↗
25. 10.3390/molecules2809389310.3390/molecules28093893 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41467‐020‐15255‐310.1038/s41467‐020‐15255‐3 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0682810.1021/acs.jpcc.0c06828 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsanm.3c0510610.1021/acsanm.3c05106 ↗
29. 10.1039/C4TC01193G10.1039/C4TC01193G ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.1425110.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.139610.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1396 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.16.174810.1103/PhysRevB.16.1748 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.16.174610.1103/PhysRevB.16.1746 ↗
38. Qvasp: A Flexible Toolkit for VASP Users in Materials Simulations10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107535 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10803310.1016/j.cpc.2021.108033 ↗
40. 10.1107/S002188981103897010.1107/S0021889811038970 ↗
41. 10.1038/371683a010.1038/371683a0 ↗
42. Atomistic Spin Model Simulations of Magnetic Nanomaterials
43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.05441510.1103/PhysRevB.82.054415 ↗
44. Optimal Phase Space Sampling for Monte Carlo Simulations of Heisenberg Spin Systems
45. A Grid‐based Bader Analysis Algorithm without Lattice Bias
46. 10.1002/jcc.2057510.1002/jcc.20575 ↗
47. 10.1063/1.355371610.1063/1.3553716 ↗