Stress History Establishes a Transient Tolerant State That Shapes Antibiotic Survival Upon Resuscitation
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Antibiotic treatment failure, often driven by non‐genetic mechanisms such as tolerance and persistence, remains a major global health challenge. ‐lactams, the most widely prescribed antibiotic class, are particularly compromised by tolerance in dormant, non‐growing cells; yet, how these drugs act on cells resuscitating from dormancy remains poorly understood. Here, we investigate the resuscitation phase at an unprecedented scale using Hi‐DFA (High‐throughput Dynamic Fate Analyser), a single‐cell microfluidic platform integrating time‐lapse imaging with machine‐learning‐based image analysis for dynamic cell‐fate tracking. We identify a distinct survival strategy: a significant fraction of resuscitating cells transiently slow their growth, facilitating survival upon ‐lactam exposure. This ‘transiently tolerant’ phenotype is considerably less frequent in unstressed, exponentially growing cells, indicating that prior starvation history predisposes cells to this state. Using simulated in vitro pharmacokinetic treatment profiles, we show that suboptimal dosing selectively enriches for this transient tolerance state. A population dynamics model built from this single‐cell antibiotic‐response data suggests that these transient‐tolerant cells, not typical starvation‐triggered persisters, may be the primary drivers of rapid population regrowth post‐treatment under clinically relevant conditions. Together, our findings define a distinct class of antibiotic survival shaped by stress history and treatment profile, offering a quantitative framework for optimizing antibiotic dosing strategy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gene Regulatory Network Analysis · Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology · Cell Image Analysis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Engineering University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
Department of Genetics University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
United Arab Emirates University Al Ain, Abu Dhabi UAE
Funding
Wellcome Trust · Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council · Rosetrees Trust
References (69)
Show source-provided references
1. Global Burden of Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance 1990–2021: A Systematic Analysis With Forecasts to 205010.1016/S0140-6736(24)01867-1 ↗
2. Global Mortality Associated With 33 Bacterial Pathogens in 2019: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 201910.1016/S0140-6736(22)02185-7 ↗
3. Global Burden of Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance in 2019: A Systematic Analysis10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0 ↗
4. Antibiotic Failure: Beyond Antimicrobial Resistance10.1016/j.drup.2023.101012 ↗
5. A. T.Deventer C. E.Stevens A.Stewart andJ. K.Hobbs “Antibiotic Tolerance Among Clinical Isolates: Mechanisms Detection Prevalence and Significance ”Clinical Microbiology Reviews(ed Forrest G. N.)37(2024): e00106–24.10.1128/cmr.00106-24 ↗
6. When Antibiotics Fail: A Clinical and Microbiological Perspective on Antibiotic Tolerance and Persistence of Staphylococcus aureus10.1093/jac/dkz559 ↗
7. Antibiotic Tolerance Indicative of Persistence Is Pervasive Among Clinical Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates and Shows Strong Condition Dependence10.1128/spectrum.02701-22 ↗
8. Antibiotic Tolerance and Persistence in Clinical Isolates of Escherichia coli Evaluated by High‐Resolution Time‐Kill Assays10.1128/spectrum.01124-25 ↗
9. Bacterial Persistence as a Phenotypic Switch10.1126/science.1099390 ↗
10. Definitions and Guidelines for Research on Antibiotic Persistence10.1038/s41579-019-0196-3 ↗
11. Bactericidal Effects of Antibiotics on Slowly Growing and Nongrowing Bacteria10.1128/AAC.35.9.1824 ↗
12. The Rate of Killing of Escherichia coli by Beta‐Lactam Antibiotics Is Strictly Proportional to the Rate of Bacterial Growth
13. Koch A. L. · 1971 · 147
14. The Starvation‐Survival State of Microorganisms in Nature and Its Relationship to the Bioavailable Energy10.1007/BF01935530 ↗
15. Nutritional Immunity: The Battle for Nutrient Metals at the Host–Pathogen Interface10.1038/s41579-022-00745-6 ↗
16. Phenotypic Variation of Salmonella in Host Tissues Delays Eradication by Antimicrobial Chemotherapy10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.045 ↗
17. Physiological Heterogeneity in Biofilms10.1038/nrmicro1838 ↗
18. Tracking Bacterial Lineages in Complex and Dynamic Environments With Applications for Growth Control and Persistence10.1038/s41564-021-00900-4 ↗
19. World Health Organization Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) Report. Antibiotic Use Data for 2022(Geneva 2025).
20. Distinguishing Between Resistance, Tolerance and Persistence to Antibiotic Treatment10.1038/nrmicro.2016.34 ↗
21. Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Uropathogenic Escherichia coli: Mechanisms of Infection and Treatment Options10.3390/ijms241310537 ↗
22. Robust Growth of Escherichia coli10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.045 ↗
23. Analysis of Factors Limiting Bacterial Growth in PDMS Mother Machine Devices10.3389/fmicb.2018.00871 ↗
24. Omnipose: A High‐Precision Morphology‐Independent Solution for Bacterial Cell Segmentation10.1038/s41592-022-01639-4 ↗
25. Synthetic Micrographs of Bacteria (SyMBac) Allows Accurate Segmentation of Bacterial Cells Using Deep Neural Networks10.1186/s12915-022-01453-6 ↗
26. A.Miles J.Kirkham M.Durant et al. “Zarr‐Developers/Zarr‐Python: V2.4.0 ”Zenodo(2020).
27. M.Rocklin “Dask: Parallel Computation With Blocked Algorithms and Task Scheduling ” inPython in Science Conference(2015) 126–132.10.25080/Majora-7b98e3ed-013 ↗
28. K.Abbott “Kieranrabbott/Hi‐DFA ” (2026).
29. N.Sofroniew T.Lambert G.Bokota et al. “Napari: A Multi‐Dimensional Image Viewer for Python ”Zenodo(2024).
30. The Importance of the Viable but Non‐Culturable State in Human Bacterial Pathogens
31. Age of Inoculum Strongly Influences Persister Frequency and Can Mask Effects of Mutations Implicated in Altered Persistence10.1128/JB.00085-11 ↗
32. Bacterial Respiration During Stationary Phase Induces Intracellular Damage That Leads to Delayed Regrowth10.1016/j.isci.2022.103765 ↗
33. L.Dewachter C.Bollen D.Wilmaerts et al. “The Dynamic Transition of Persistence Toward the Viable but Nonculturable State During Stationary Phase Is Driven by Protein Aggregation ”mBio12(2021): 10.1128/mbio.00703–21.10.1128/mBio.00703-21 ↗
34. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention “Outpatient Antibiotic Prescriptions — United States ”Centers for Disease Control and Prevention United States Tech. Rep. (2024).
35. UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) “English Surveillance Programme for Antimicrobial Utilisation and Resistance (ESPAUR) Report 2022 to 2023 ”Tech. Rep. (2023).
36. Non‐Linear Absorption Pharmacokinetics of Amoxicillin: Consequences for Dosing Regimens and Clinical Breakpoints10.1093/jac/dkw226 ↗
37. EUCAST “Amoxicillin: Rationale for the EUCAST Clinical Breakpoints ”Tech. Rep.1 (2010).
38. A Systematic Review on the Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Cephalexin in Healthy and Diseased Populations10.3390/antibiotics12091402 ↗
39. The Pharmacokinetics of Once‐Daily Dosing of Ceftriaxone in Critically Ill Patients10.1093/jac/47.4.421 ↗
40. “Ceftriaxone: Rationale for EUCAST Clinical Breakpoints ”Tech. Rep. 1(EUCAST 2023) 4.
41. “Amoxicillin | Drugs | BNF Content Published by NICE ”https://bnf.nice.org.uk/drugs/amoxicillin/.
42. “Cefalexin | Drugs | BNF Content Published by NICE ”https://bnf.nice.org.uk/drugs/cefalexin/.
43. Mapping Single‐Cell Responses to Population‐Level Dynamics During Antibiotic Treatment10.15252/msb.202211475 ↗
44. Bacterial Persisters and Infection: Past, Present, and Progressing10.1146/annurev-micro-020518-115650 ↗
45. Salmonella Persisters Undermine Host Immune Defenses During Antibiotic Treatment10.1126/science.aat7148 ↗
46. S.Kollerová L.Jouvet J.Smelková S.Zunk‐Parras A.Rodríguez‐Rojas andU. K.Steiner “Phenotypic Resistant Single‐Cell Characteristics Under Recurring Ampicillin Antibiotic Exposure in Escherichia coli ”mSystems9(2024): e00 256–24.10.1128/msystems.00256-24 ↗
47. Transient Antibiotic Tolerance Triggered by Nutrient Shifts From Gluconeogenic Carbon Sources to Fatty Acid10.3389/fmicb.2022.854272 ↗
48. Stationary Phase in Gram‐Negative Bacteria10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00213.x ↗
49. Molecular Basis of Stationary Phase Survival and Applications10.3389/fmicb.2017.02000 ↗
50. Stress Sigma Factor RpoS Degradation and Translation Are Sensitive to the State of Central Metabolism10.1073/pnas.1504639112 ↗
51. T.Gervais B.Kscheschinski M.Mell N.Goepfert E. van Nimwegen andT.Julou “E. coli Prepares for Starvation by Dramatically Remodeling Its Proteome in the First Hours After Loss of Nutrients ” (2025) 2024.02.29.582700.10.1101/2024.02.29.582700 ↗
52. Host Stress Drives Tolerance and Persistence: The Bane of Anti‐Microbial Therapeutics10.1016/j.chom.2024.04.019 ↗
53. The Impact of Starvation on the Microbiome and Gut‐Brain Interaction in Anorexia Nervosa10.3389/fendo.2019.00041 ↗
54. Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics: Critical Interactions of 'Bug and Drug'10.1038/nrmicro862 ↗
55. A.Gutierrez S.Jain P.Bhargava M.Hamblin M. A.Lobritz andJ. J.Collins “Understanding and Sensitizing Density‐Dependent Persistence to Quinolone Antibiotics ”Molecular Cell68(2017): 1147–1154.e3.10.1016/j.molcel.2017.11.012 ↗
56. A Host‐Directed Adjuvant Sensitizes Intracellular Bacterial Persisters to Antibiotics10.1038/s41564-025-02124-2 ↗
57. A Leader Cell Triggers End of Lag Phase in Populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens10.1093/femsml/uqac022 ↗
58. J.Bär S. G. V.Charlton A.Tarnutzer G. S.Ugolini E.Secchi andA. S.Zinkernagel “Single‐Cell Approach Dissecting agr Quorum Sensing Dynamics in Staphylococcus aureus ” (2024) 2024.02.27.582246.
59. Rapid Label‐Free Identification of Seven Bacterial Species Using Microfluidics, Single‐Cell Time‐Lapse Phase‐Contrast Microscopy, and Deep Learning‐Based Image and Video Classification10.1371/journal.pone.0330265 ↗
60. Rapid Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing and Species Identification for Mixed Samples10.1038/s41467-022-33659-1 ↗
61. “Strain ‐ MG1655 ”https://ecgrc.net/CGSC/Strain.php?ID=4837.
62. Bacterial Persisters Are a Stochastically Formed Subpopulation of Low‐Energy Cells10.1371/journal.pbio.3001194 ↗
63. “Quantitative Single‐Cell Imaging of Efflux Pump Heterogeneity and Antibiotic Response Dynamics ” inMethods in Enzymology(Academic Press 2025) 503–535.10.1016/bs.mie.2025.08.029 ↗
64. Structural and Functional Analyses of Nematode‐Derived Antimicrobial Peptides Support the Occurrence of Direct Mechanisms of Worm‐Microbiota Interactions10.1016/j.csbj.2024.04.019 ↗
65. G.Hardo “Georgeoshardo/PyMMM ” (2025).
66. K.Cutler “Kevinjohncutler/omnipose ” (2026).
67. G.Hardo “SyMBac ” (2022).
68. When to Wake Up? The Optimal Waking‐Up Strategies for Starvation‐Induced Persistence10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008655 ↗
69. Parameter Estimation for the Distribution of Single Cell Lag Times10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.03.023 ↗