journal article·2026-05-15Open access

Sulfated Cyclocarya Paliurus Polysaccharide Sorchestrates the Gut Microbiome to Mobilize a Host‐Derived 12‐HEPE Against Ulcerative Colitis

Xianxiang Chen, Mingyue Shen, Rui Zhang, Zhibing Huang, Hui Niu, Qiang Yu, Yi Chen, Xiangwen Pan, Liyuan Rong, Huiliang Wen, Jun Yang, Jianhua Xie

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite extensive evidence supporting the therapeutic potential of natural product‐derived compounds in Ulcerative colitis (UC), their precise mechanisms have yet to be fully elucidated. In this study, structurally modified Cyclocarya paliurus polysaccharide (CP) derivatives were evaluated in a dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)‐induced UC mouse model. Among the variants tested, sulfated Cyclocarya paliurus polysaccharide (SCP) emerged as the most therapeutically potent. SCP administration markedly attenuated colitis severity, as evidenced by relieved disease symptoms and reinforced intestinal barrier function. Mechanistically, SCP restored gut microbial homeostasis by enriching beneficial Bacteroidetes and enhancing short‐chain fatty acids (SCFAs) production. This remodeled microbial ecosystem orchestrates the upregulation of host‐derived 12‐hydroxyeicosapentaenoic acid (12‐HEPE), which exerts anti‐inflammatory effects via direct inhibition of Toll‐like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling. The gut microbiota's functional relevance was substantiated by fecal microbiota transplantation and antibiotic‐mediated exhaustion studies. Notably, the therapeutic benefits of 12‐HEPE were abrogated upon co‐administration of a TLR4 agonist, confirming its target specificity. Elevated serum 12‐HEPE levels were observed in a human UC cohort, implying a potential compensatory immunoregulatory response. Our findings elucidate a novel microbiota–host interaction axis wherein SCP alleviates UC by modulating the gut microbiota to enhance endogenous 12‐HEPE production, thereby suppressing TLR4‐mediated inflammation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Gut microbiota and health · Inflammatory Bowel Disease · Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Resources Nanchang University Nanchang China

College of Food Science and Engineering Hainan University Haikou China

Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine Xijing Hospital Fourth Military Medical University Xi'an China

Department of Wood Science The University of British Columbia Vancouver Canada

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1136/gutjnl‐2024‐33191410.1136/gutjnl‐2024‐331914 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.clim.2021.10891610.1016/j.clim.2021.108916 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.tips.2024.08.00310.1016/j.tips.2024.08.003 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41423‐024‐01218‐x10.1038/s41423‐024‐01218‐x ↗
5. 10.1002/mnfr.20220004710.1002/mnfr.202200047 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.fbio.2024.10416210.1016/j.fbio.2024.104162 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.fbio.2024.10567110.1016/j.fbio.2024.105671 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.11075610.1016/j.foodres.2021.110756 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.10431710.1016/j.tifs.2023.104317 ↗
10. The Diagnostic and Prognostic Potential of gut Bacteria in Inflammatory Bowel Disease10.1080/19490976.2023.2176118 ↗
11. 10.1038/nri270710.1038/nri2707 ↗
12. 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.810.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.8 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41575‐019‐0258‐z10.1038/s41575‐019‐0258‐z ↗
14. 10.1186/s40168‐024‐01896‐910.1186/s40168‐024‐01896‐9 ↗
15. 10.1111/1751‐2980.1284910.1111/1751‐2980.12849 ↗
16. 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.08010.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.080 ↗
17. 10.1186/s40168‐022‐01296‐x10.1186/s40168‐022‐01296‐x ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.13641010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.136410 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.12151010.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121510 ↗
20. 10.1039/D0OB02071K10.1039/D0OB02071K ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.03.03210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.03.032 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.11.08810.1016/j.carbpol.2016.11.088 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.03310.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.033 ↗
24. 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.07.02610.1053/j.gastro.2021.07.026 ↗
25. 10.1002/cbf.410810.1002/cbf.4108 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41586‐021‐03986‐210.1038/s41586‐021‐03986‐2 ↗
27. 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.11.01510.1053/j.gastro.2021.11.015 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c0302410.1021/acs.jafc.0c03024 ↗
29. 10.1186/s12964‐021‐00771‐610.1186/s12964‐021‐00771‐6 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.07.00610.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.07.006 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.02.01810.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.02.018 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.07.03110.1016/j.carbpol.2015.07.031 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.19210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.192 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.01710.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.017 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.07.00910.1016/j.carbpol.2017.07.009 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0079‐6700(00)00045‐910.1016/S0079‐6700(00)00045‐9 ↗
37. 10.4161/gmic.1932010.4161/gmic.19320 ↗
38. 10.1002/imt2.16310.1002/imt2.163 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41579‐020‐0438‐410.1038/s41579‐020‐0438‐4 ↗
40. 10.1128/iai.00095‐2110.1128/iai.00095‐21 ↗
41. 10.1096/fj.202001687R10.1096/fj.202001687R ↗
42. 10.1038/s41598‐021‐89707‐110.1038/s41598‐021‐89707‐1 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41401‐023‐01188‐210.1038/s41401‐023‐01188‐2 ↗
44. 10.1038/nri.2015.410.1038/nri.2015.4 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsptsci.9b0007510.1021/acsptsci.9b00075 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.10.00610.1016/j.cmet.2013.10.006 ↗
47. 10.1007/s12016‐020‐08796‐410.1007/s12016‐020‐08796‐4 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.02.02810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.02.028 ↗
49. 10.1016/0003‐2697(73)90377‐110.1016/0003‐2697(73)90377‐1 ↗
50. 10.1021/ac60111a01710.1021/ac60111a017 ↗
51. 10.1016/S0144‐8617(01)00221‐110.1016/S0144‐8617(01)00221‐1 ↗