journal article·2026-05-08Open access

mGluR5 in EC CCK to BLA Circuit Modulates Depressive‐Like Phenotypes through CCK Signaling

Muhammad Asim, Huajie Wang, Gao Qianqian, Abdul Waris, Jufang He

Abstract

ABSTRACT Dysregulation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) and cholecystokinin (CCK) signaling has been implicated in major depressive disorder (MDD), but the underlying circuit mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we define how mGluR5 regulates depressive‐like behaviors through CCK signaling in the entorhinal cortex (EC) to basolateral amygdala (BLA) pathway. Anatomical tracing and optogenetics show that CCK‐expressing neurons in the EC project to the BLA and that their activation increases glutamatergic activity in this region. Bidirectional circuit manipulation establishes causality: optogenetic stimulation induces, whereas inhibition alleviates, depressive‐like phenotypes. Expansion microscopy reveals postsynaptic mGluR5 enrichment along this pathway. Chronic social defeat stress (CSDS) downregulates mGluR5 in the BLA. Pharmacologically, mGluR5 antagonism phenocopies CCK‐driven pro‐depressive effects, whereas CCK knockout mice resist behavioral consequences of mGluR5 inhibition. Mechanistically, mGluR5 agonism suppresses CCK release, disrupts BLA long‐term potentiation, and mitigates CSDS‐induced behaviors. Circuit‐specific mGluR5 knockdown in the EC CCK →BLA pathway increases stress susceptibility. These findings identify an mGluR5‐CCK axis within an EC CCK →BLA circuit that governs stress‐induced affective states.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Treatment of Major Depression · Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research · Memory and Neural Mechanisms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Neuroscience City University of Hong Kong Kowloon Tong Hong Kong China

Centre For Regenerative Medicine and Health, Hong Kong Institute of Science and Innovation Chinese Academy of Sciences Hong Kong China

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Stanford University Stanford California USA

Research Centre for Treatments of Brain Disorders City University of Hong Kong Kowloon Tong Hong Kong China

References (91)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/s0140‐6736(21)02143‐710.1016/s0140‐6736(21)02143‐7 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.08.00210.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.08.002 ↗
3. 10.1016/s0140‐6736(22)00187‐810.1016/s0140‐6736(22)00187‐8 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.07.00110.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.07.001 ↗
5. 10.1007/s12264‐019‐00422‐410.1007/s12264‐019‐00422‐4 ↗
6. 10.1146/annurev‐neuro‐070815‐01410610.1146/annurev‐neuro‐070815‐014106 ↗
7. 10.1038/nrn338110.1038/nrn3381 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.neuint.2021.10504410.1016/j.neuint.2021.105044 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mcn.2022.10372310.1016/j.mcn.2022.103723 ↗
10. 10.1111/cns.1442210.1111/cns.14422 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.npep.2023.10232210.1016/j.npep.2023.102322 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.12.02610.1016/j.biopsych.2020.12.026 ↗
13. 10.1007/s12264‐020‐00545‐z10.1007/s12264‐020‐00545‐z ↗
14. 10.1126/science.109990110.1126/science.1099901 ↗
15. 10.1038/nature0372110.1038/nature03721 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41380‐022‐01540‐810.1038/s41380‐022‐01540‐8 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41591‐018‐0002‐110.1038/s41591‐018‐0002‐1 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.01.02910.1016/j.biopsych.2011.01.029 ↗
19. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0154‐12.201210.1523/JNEUROSCI.0154‐12.2012 ↗
20. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20‐18‐06974.200010.1523/JNEUROSCI.20‐18‐06974.2000 ↗
21. 10.1038/nn.430310.1038/nn.4303 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.07.06710.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.07.067 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.10.02410.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.10.024 ↗
24. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19‐05‐01876.199910.1523/JNEUROSCI.19‐05‐01876.1999 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0306‐4522(03)00386‐510.1016/S0306‐4522(03)00386‐5 ↗
26. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4368‐15.201610.1523/JNEUROSCI.4368‐15.2016 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.03610.1016/j.cub.2013.01.036 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0301‐0082(98)00003‐310.1016/S0301‐0082(98)00003‐3 ↗
29. 10.1073/pnas.250212712210.1073/pnas.2502127122 ↗
30. Y.Fu Z.Cao T.Ye et al. Projection neurons from medial entorhinal cortex to basolateral amygdala are critical for the retrieval of morphine withdrawal memory(2024).10.1016/j.isci.2024.110239 ↗
31. 10.7554/eLife.6933310.7554/eLife.69333 ↗
32. 10.1073/pnas.050540710310.1073/pnas.0505407103 ↗
33. 10.1073/pnas.121960111010.1073/pnas.1219601110 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41591‐018‐0299‐910.1038/s41591‐018‐0299‐9 ↗
35. Bradwejn J. · 2013 · 189
36. 10.1016/S0924‐977X(97)00046‐110.1016/S0924‐977X(97)00046‐1 ↗
37. 10.1038/s41380‐023‐02127‐710.1038/s41380‐023‐02127‐7 ↗
38. 10.1046/j.1471‐4159.1998.70010341.x10.1046/j.1471‐4159.1998.70010341.x ↗
39. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.0911160710.1176/appi.ajp.2011.09111607 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2012.01.01010.1016/j.brainresbull.2012.01.010 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.01.00610.1016/j.biopsych.2022.01.006 ↗
42. 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.0033510.3389/fpsyt.2020.00335 ↗
43. 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.107264210.3389/fnbeh.2023.1072642 ↗
44. 10.1038/nn.402810.1038/nn.4028 ↗
45. 10.1038/nature1171310.1038/nature11713 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.03.02410.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.03.024 ↗
47. 10.1016/S0896‐6273(01)00375‐010.1016/S0896‐6273(01)00375‐0 ↗
48. 10.1038/s41593‐023‐01345‐010.1038/s41593‐023‐01345‐0 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.10561510.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105615 ↗
50. 10.1152/jn.00465.201410.1152/jn.00465.2014 ↗
51. 10.1002/alz.7000410.1002/alz.70004 ↗
52. 10.1073/pnas.181683311610.1073/pnas.1816833116 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.isci.2023.10654210.1016/j.isci.2023.106542 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.06.01110.1016/j.biopsych.2022.06.011 ↗
55. 10.1523/jneurosci.0569‐18.201810.1523/jneurosci.0569‐18.2018 ↗
56. M.Asim H.Wang A.Waris G.Qianqian andX.Chen Cholecystokinin neurotransmission in the central nervous system: Insights into its role in health and disease(2024).10.1002/biof.2081 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.04.00910.1016/j.biopsych.2005.04.009 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.02.00810.1016/j.biopsych.2010.02.008 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.01510.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.015 ↗
60. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.1107110510.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11071105 ↗
61. 10.1038/s41398‐024‐03135‐z10.1038/s41398‐024‐03135‐z ↗
62. 10.7554/eLife.8335610.7554/eLife.83356 ↗
63. 10.7554/eLife.1824710.7554/eLife.18247 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.01310.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.013 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.10220710.1016/j.jbc.2022.102207 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.11346710.1016/j.celrep.2023.113467 ↗
67. 10.7554/eLife.8389710.7554/eLife.83897 ↗
68. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1673‐19.201910.1523/JNEUROSCI.1673‐19.2019 ↗
69. 10.3389/fncel.2018.0014810.3389/fncel.2018.00148 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.05.02210.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.05.022 ↗
71. 10.1016/S0924‐977X(03)00103‐210.1016/S0924‐977X(03)00103‐2 ↗
72. 10.1016/0014‐2999(94)90115‐510.1016/0014‐2999(94)90115‐5 ↗
73. 10.1016/0143‐4179(91)90084‐V10.1016/0143‐4179(91)90084‐V ↗
74. 10.1016/0006‐3223(92)90137‐O10.1016/0006‐3223(92)90137‐O ↗
75. 10.1111/j.1749‐6632.1990.tb16904.x10.1111/j.1749‐6632.1990.tb16904.x ↗
76. 10.1016/j.addicn.2022.10002410.1016/j.addicn.2022.100024 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.06.01110.1016/j.biopsych.2022.06.011 ↗
78. 10.1073/pnas.181166411510.1073/pnas.1811664115 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.07.00210.1016/j.neuron.2014.07.002 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.07.01110.1016/j.neuron.2019.07.011 ↗
81. 10.1124/jpet.106.10314310.1124/jpet.106.103143 ↗
82. 10.1038/sj.bjp.070392310.1038/sj.bjp.0703923 ↗
83. 10.1073/pnas.140098811110.1073/pnas.1400988111 ↗
84. 10.1038/s41593‐019‐0480‐610.1038/s41593‐019‐0480‐6 ↗
85. 10.1126/science.aaw432510.1126/science.aaw4325 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.cub.2021.03.02410.1016/j.cub.2021.03.024 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.01.01110.1016/j.neuron.2022.01.011 ↗
88. 10.1038/nm.405010.1038/nm.4050 ↗
89. 10.1038/nature1329410.1038/nature13294 ↗
90. 10.1016/j.pbb.2020.17309310.1016/j.pbb.2020.173093 ↗
91. 10.1126/science.112097210.1126/science.1120972 ↗