journal article·2026-05Open access

Thermally Degradable Biocompatible Hydrogel as Transient Encapsulation Coating for Implantable Sensors

Francesca Persano, Eleonora Vandini, Eleonora Daini, Antonietta Vilella, Daniela Giuliani, Leonardo Lamanna, Marco Friuli, Christian Demitri, Laura Pecoraro, Amilcare Barca, Tiziano Verri, Cosimino Malitesta, Martina Corsi, Giuseppe Barillaro, Elisabetta Mazzotta

Advanced Science· Volume 13· Issue 30

Abstract

ABSTRACT Implantable sensors are redefining real‐time, continuous physiological monitoring and hold great promise for personalized medicine. Yet, their clinical application is often hindered by the lack of effective encapsulation materials that simultaneously ensure environmental exposure and protect sensor components, thereby preserving signal fidelity. Although hydrogel‐based systems offer promising features such as biological tissue‐like mechanics and biocompatibility, their use as sensor coatings remains limited. Notably, despite growing interest in bioresorbable implant technologies, few coating systems offer controlled, on‐demand degradability, which represents a key requirement to avoid possible misalignment between coating dissolution rate and sensor lifetime. Here, we present a thermoresponsive hydrogel, consisting of methylcellulose, polyethylene glycol and polyacrylic acid (MC/PEG/PAA), demonstrating its high suitability as a transient encapsulating coating. The system, assembled by physical cross‐linking without using toxic reagents, and extensively characterized in terms of thermal responsiveness, swelling behavior, stability, and mechanical performance, exhibited reversible dissolution upon a mild temperature drop (from ≈37°C to ≈25°C), which was conveniently used to easily enable its degradation under physiological conditions. The hydrogel ability to act as a coating was demonstrated via the encapsulation of a fluorescent model device, confirming its optical transparency and signal‐transmission capability. In vitro studies indicated the hydrogel potential to mitigate inflammatory response, while in vivo biocompatibility, assessed in mice, revealed no signs of systemic toxicity or behavioral changes post‐implantation. Additionally, the hydrogel exhibited safe in vivo biodegradation upon a slight local temperature decrease, completely dissolving within few minutes. The developed coating, integrating good optical transparency, ease of fabrication, and in vivo safety with on‐demand, controllable degradation upon an external low‐temperature stimulus, represents a substantial advancement toward next‐generation bioresorbable implantable devices and paves the way for driving successful transformation in the field.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies (Di.S.Te.B.A.) University of Salento Lecce Italy

Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences University of Modena and Reggio Emilia via G. Campi 287 Modena Italy

Department of Engineering for Innovation Campus Ecotekne University of Salento Lecce Italy

Department of Experimental Medicine University of Salento Lecce Italy

Laboratory of Applied Physiology Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies (Di.S.Te.B.A.) University of Salento Lecce Italy

Laboratory of Applied Physiology Department of Experimental Medicine (Di.Me.S.) University of Salento Lecce Italy

Department of Information Engineering University of Pisa via G. Caruso 16 Pisa Italy

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s44287‐025‐00190‐610.1038/s44287‐025‐00190‐6 ↗
2. 10.1039/D4TB00782D10.1039/D4TB00782D ↗
3. 10.1007/s42242‐024‐00302‐510.1007/s42242‐024‐00302‐5 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.12.00510.1016/j.tibtech.2022.12.005 ↗
5. 10.1007/s40820-023-01272-610.1007/s40820-023-01272-6 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41578‐019‐0150‐z10.1038/s41578‐019‐0150‐z ↗
7. 10.4103/1673‐5374.30034210.4103/1673‐5374.300342 ↗
8. 10.1021/ja042898o10.1021/ja042898o ↗
9. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.10586010.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.105860 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.02210.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.022 ↗
11. 10.3390/cells1112197910.3390/cells11121979 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.12080610.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120806 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41928‐022‐00913‐910.1038/s41928‐022‐00913‐9 ↗
14. 10.1002/adhm.20200137310.1002/adhm.202001373 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20200679210.1002/adma.202006792 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41551‐018‐0273‐310.1038/s41551‐018‐0273‐3 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10799810.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107998 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.10549310.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.105493 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.14867310.1016/j.cej.2024.148673 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41392-021-00830-x10.1038/s41392-021-00830-x ↗
21. 10.1007/s10439‐023‐03154‐910.1007/s10439‐023‐03154‐9 ↗
22. 10.3390/gels1009059210.3390/gels10090592 ↗
23. 10.1002/adhm.20240129610.1002/adhm.202401296 ↗
24. 10.1002/advs.20250267810.1002/advs.202502678 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.mattod.2022.05.01910.1016/j.mattod.2022.05.019 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.10.26210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.10.262 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.bios.2007.11.01010.1016/j.bios.2007.11.010 ↗
28. Hydrogel‐Coating Improves the In‐Vivo Stability Of Electrochemical Aptamer‐Based Biosensors
29. A. L.Nichols C. B.Marotta H.Lukas N. J.Friesenhahn D. A.Wagenaar S. L.Mayo D. A.Dougherty N. L.Benowitz W.Gao A. K.Muthusamy andH. A.Lester 2025DA DoughertyNicotine and Tobacco Research 27(2025):1499–1512 academic.oup.com https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf062.10.1093/ntr/ntaf062 ↗
30. 10.1073/pnas.171087411510.1073/pnas.1710874115 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41467-019-13198-y10.1038/s41467-019-13198-y ↗
32. 10.1073/pnas.191034311710.1073/pnas.1910343117 ↗
33. 10.1002/adhm.20200094210.1002/adhm.202000942 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41587‐021‐00948‐x10.1038/s41587‐021‐00948‐x ↗
35. 10.1021/acsami.5b0605910.1021/acsami.5b06059 ↗
36. 10.1002/smll.20180205010.1002/smll.201802050 ↗
37. 10.1126/science.122632510.1126/science.1226325 ↗
38. 10.1073/pnas.140774311110.1073/pnas.1407743111 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41551‐018‐0300‐410.1038/s41551‐018‐0300‐4 ↗
40. 10.1002/adma.20210820310.1002/adma.202108203 ↗
41. 10.1038/nmat462410.1038/nmat4624 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsami.8b1416110.1021/acsami.8b14161 ↗
43. 10.1002/adma.20150118010.1002/adma.201501180 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsomega.3c0720310.1021/acsomega.3c07203 ↗
45. 10.1002/VIW.2025002910.1002/VIW.20250029 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.05110.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.051 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.11127610.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111276 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11634310.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116343 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.03.06610.1016/j.carbpol.2019.03.066 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.04710.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.047 ↗
51. 10.1002/mabi.20130031310.1002/mabi.201300313 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15498810.1016/j.cej.2024.154988 ↗
53. 10.1007/s10570‐018‐1874‐410.1007/s10570‐018‐1874‐4 ↗
54. 10.1002/advs.20220206210.1002/advs.202202062 ↗
55. 10.1002/adma.20220160010.1002/adma.202201600 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.06010.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.060 ↗
57. Polyelectrolyte Gels: Fundamentals, Fabrication and Applications
58. 10.3390/gels603003110.3390/gels6030031 ↗
59. 10.3390/polym1306090210.3390/polym13060902 ↗
60. 10.1002/pola.2247610.1002/pola.22476 ↗
61. 10.1002/app.2920910.1002/app.29209 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.09.00510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.09.005 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.jobab.2024.12.00510.1016/j.jobab.2024.12.005 ↗
64. 10.3390/polym1406125910.3390/polym14061259 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.06510.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.065 ↗
66. 10.1002/adhm.20230010510.1002/adhm.202300105 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.06.03810.1016/j.jcis.2022.06.038 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.aca.2023.34108510.1016/j.aca.2023.341085 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.00410.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.004 ↗
70. 10.3390/ijms2612571310.3390/ijms26125713 ↗