journal article·2026-07Open access

Functional Mapping of Neurodevelopmental Disease Pathways to Key Neurodevelopmental Processes Represented in the Developmental Neurotoxicity In Vitro Testing Battery

Eliska Kuchovska, Kristina Bartmann, Georgea Raad, Mats Schade, Luiz Ladeira, Arif Dönmez, Jördis Klose, Nicolai Görts, Denis Polozij, Lynn‐Christin Saborowski, Farina Bendt, Bernard Staumont, Liesbet Geris, Katharina Koch, Ellen Fritsche

Advanced Science· Volume 13· Issue 37

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Developmental Neurotoxicity (DNT) in vitro battery (IVB) enables efficient and human‐relevant evaluation of chemicals for DNT potential. To expand its biological applicability domain toward human disease, this study maps neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD)‐relevant signaling pathways to key neurodevelopmental processes (KNDPs) using primary human fetal neural progenitor cells (NPCs). Using pharmacological intervention, eighteen NDD pathways are assessed for their impact on seven KNDPs, namely NPC proliferation, radial glia migration, neuronal and oligodendrocyte differentiation and migration, and neurite outgrowth. In total, modulation of sixteen pathways is associated with changes in at least one KNDP. Oligodendrocyte differentiation shows the highest sensitivity (13 pathways), followed by radial glia migration (11 pathways) and NPC proliferation (9 pathways), whereas neuronal migration remains unaffected. Perturbation of the RhoA and mitochondrial complex I pathways is associated with the broadest phenotypic responses, influencing five KNDPs each, while STAT3‐ and TrkB‐related modulation falls outside the assay's applicability domain. Pathway‐KNDP associations are integrated into an exemplary interactive physiological map of human oligodendrocyte development, linking mechanistic perturbations to human‐relevant biology. Defining which NDD pathways can be functionally probed refines the DNT IVB's biological applicability domain, increases confidence in its protective power, and supports mechanistic interpretation of new approach methodology‐based DNT assessment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research · Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms · Pluripotent Stem Cells Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

IUF – Leibniz Research Institute for Environmental Medicine Düsseldorf Germany

DNTOX GmbH Düsseldorf Germany

GIGA Molecular and Computational Biology University of Liège Belgium

Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center KU Leuven Belgium

Biomechanics Section KU Leuven Belgium

SCAHT – Swiss Centre for Applied Human Toxicology & Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences University of Basel Switzerland

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. OECD.Initial Recommendations on Evaluation of Data From the Developmental Neurotoxicity (DNT) In‐Vitro Testing Battery;2023.https://doi.org/10.1787/91964ef3‐en.
2. 10.1016/j.taap.2018.02.00410.1016/j.taap.2018.02.004 ↗
3. 10.2903/sp.efsa.2021.EN‐692410.2903/sp.efsa.2021.EN‐6924 ↗
4. 10.1016/J.REPROTOX.2020.08.00210.1016/J.REPROTOX.2020.08.002 ↗
5. 10.14573/altex.140327110.14573/altex.1403271 ↗
6. 10.14573/altex.240328110.14573/altex.2403281 ↗
7. OECD.OECD Guidline for the testing of chemicals 443 Extended one‐generation reproductive toxicity study 2025;(443): 1–25.http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Extended+One‐Generation+Reproductive+Toxicity+Study#6%5Cnhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:443:+Extended+One‐Generation+Reproductive+Toxicity+Study%230.
8. 10.14573/ALTEX.200124110.14573/ALTEX.2001241 ↗
9. 10.1289/EHP.090154510.1289/EHP.0901545 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.01.00310.1016/j.neuron.2015.01.003 ↗
11. 10.1016/J.AJHG.2018.10.00910.1016/J.AJHG.2018.10.009 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.tins.2024.05.00910.1016/j.tins.2024.05.009 ↗
13. 10.2903/sp.efsa.2024.EN‐917410.2903/sp.efsa.2024.EN‐9174 ↗
14. 10.3390/biology1002008610.3390/biology10020086 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.envint.2023.10808210.1016/j.envint.2023.108082 ↗
16. 10.3389/FTOX.2022.80862010.3389/FTOX.2022.808620 ↗
17. 10.1016/J.TAAP.2018.04.00110.1016/J.TAAP.2018.04.001 ↗
18. 10.1093/toxsci/kfac01810.1093/toxsci/kfac018 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.13703510.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137035 ↗
20. 10.1016/J.ETAP.2004.12.03510.1016/J.ETAP.2004.12.035 ↗
21. 10.1289/ehp.942710.1289/ehp.9427 ↗
22. 10.14573/altex.2011.1.00910.14573/altex.2011.1.009 ↗
23. 10.14573/altex.1701171s10.14573/altex.1701171s ↗
24. 10.3389/ftox.2022.81637010.3389/ftox.2022.816370 ↗
25. 10.14573/altex.240104110.14573/altex.2401041 ↗
26. 10.1177/02611929040320050310.1177/026119290403200503 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cotox.2025.10052810.1016/j.cotox.2025.100528 ↗
28. OECD.Guidance Document for Describing Non‐Guideline In Vitro Test Methods. OECD;2014.https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264274716‐en.
29. OECD.OECD SERIES ON TESTING AND ASSESSMENT n34 Guidance document on the validation and international acceptance of new or updated test methods for hazard assessment2005:33.
30. 10.14573/altex.171208110.14573/altex.1712081 ↗
31. 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e17071210.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170712 ↗
32. 10.1007/S00204‐022‐03435‐7/FIGURES/210.1007/S00204‐022‐03435‐7/FIGURES/2 ↗
33. EMA.Qualification of novel methodologies for drug development: guidance to applicants EMA/CHMP/SAWP/72894/2008. Published online2008 https://bit.ly/3RPtNLE.
34. OECD.Workshop Report on Operational and Financial Aspects of Validation OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 399. OECD Publ. Published online September 19 2024 https://doi.org/10.1787/db9979eb‐en.
35. 10.1007/S00204‐024‐03736‐Z/TABLES/210.1007/S00204‐024‐03736‐Z/TABLES/2 ↗
36. 10.1007/s00204‐022‐03365‐410.1007/s00204‐022‐03365‐4 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.taap.2018.05.00910.1016/j.taap.2018.05.009 ↗
38. 10.2903/sp.efsa.2020.en‐193810.2903/sp.efsa.2020.en‐1938 ↗
39. 10.1038/nrn184710.1038/nrn1847 ↗
40. 10.1016/J.NEURON.2011.02.03110.1016/J.NEURON.2011.02.031 ↗
41. 10.1038/nn147510.1038/nn1475 ↗
42. 10.1007/s00441‐017‐2641‐910.1007/s00441‐017‐2641‐9 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.tox.2021.15284610.1016/j.tox.2021.152846 ↗
44. 10.14573/altex.241224110.14573/altex.2412241 ↗
45. 10.1093/bib/bby02410.1093/bib/bby024 ↗
46. 10.1038/s41540‐018‐0059‐y10.1038/s41540‐018‐0059‐y ↗
47. 10.3389/fbinf.2023.119731010.3389/fbinf.2023.1197310 ↗
48. OECD.Users’ Handbook Supplement to the Guidance Document for Developing and Assessing Adverse Outcome Pathways. OECD Publ.2018; OECD Serie https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlv1m9d1g32‐en.
49. 10.2760/774901010.2760/7749010 ↗
50. 10.1016/J.REPROTOX.2020.09.00210.1016/J.REPROTOX.2020.09.002 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.crtox.2024.10021010.1016/j.crtox.2024.100210 ↗
52. 10.1016/J.EXPNEUROL.2016.03.01710.1016/J.EXPNEUROL.2016.03.017 ↗
53. 10.1016/J.JACBTS.2019.10.00810.1016/J.JACBTS.2019.10.008 ↗
54. 10.14573/altex.200324210.14573/altex.2003242 ↗
55. 10.1038/s41586‐021‐04072‐310.1038/s41586‐021‐04072‐3 ↗
56. 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.659910.2903/j.efsa.2021.6599 ↗
57. 10.1038/s41586‐022‐05574‐410.1038/s41586‐022‐05574‐4 ↗
58. 10.1126/sciadv.adg261510.1126/sciadv.adg2615 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.05110.1016/j.cell.2018.03.051 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.06710.1016/j.cell.2018.03.067 ↗
61. 10.1371/journal.pone.022123010.1371/journal.pone.0221230 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.12310.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.123 ↗
63. 10.1007/s00018‐024‐05406‐w10.1007/s00018‐024‐05406‐w ↗
64. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.03.02110.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.03.021 ↗
65. 10.1177/0261192923115775610.1177/02611929231157756 ↗
66. 10.1016/J.NEURON.2019.06.01110.1016/J.NEURON.2019.06.011 ↗
67. 10.1038/s41593‐020‐00794‐110.1038/s41593‐020‐00794‐1 ↗
68. 10.1016/J.CELL.2021.10.00310.1016/J.CELL.2021.10.003 ↗
69. 10.1289/EHP.080020710.1289/EHP.0800207 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.nbd.2022.10571910.1016/j.nbd.2022.105719 ↗
71. 10.3390/CELLS1209127010.3390/CELLS12091270 ↗
72. 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.4510.1038/nrneurol.2017.45 ↗
73. 10.1016/J.STEM.2016.12.00710.1016/J.STEM.2016.12.007 ↗
74. 10.1038/s41593‐024‐01599‐210.1038/s41593‐024‐01599‐2 ↗
75. 10.1038/nmeth.208910.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗
76. 10.1007/s00204‐016‐1852‐210.1007/s00204‐016‐1852‐2 ↗
77. 10.1002/cyto.a.2451410.1002/cyto.a.24514 ↗
78. E.Fritsche “Report on Integrated Testing Strategies for the Identification and Evaluation of Chemical Hazards Associated with the Developmental Neurotoxicity (DNT) to Facilitate Discussions at the Joint EFSA/OECD Workshop on DNT ” (2017) ENV/JM/MONO(2017)4/ANN1.
79. 10.1016/J.ENVINT.2025.10940010.1016/J.ENVINT.2025.109400 ↗
80. 10.14573/altex.200720110.14573/altex.2007201 ↗
81. 10.1038/nature1318510.1038/nature13185 ↗
82. 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.465810.2903/j.efsa.2017.4658 ↗
83. 10.1371/journal.pone.014602110.1371/journal.pone.0146021 ↗
84. 10.14573/altex.221017110.14573/altex.2210171 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.comtox.2025.10036010.1016/j.comtox.2025.100360 ↗
86. 10.14573/altex.180323110.14573/altex.1803231 ↗
87. 10.1007/s00204‐020‐02913‐010.1007/s00204‐020‐02913‐0 ↗
88. 10.14573/altex.191202110.14573/altex.1912021 ↗
89. 10.1038/sdata.2016.1810.1038/sdata.2016.18 ↗
90. 10.1038/nbt.155810.1038/nbt.1558 ↗
91. 10.1109/WSC.2006.32294610.1109/WSC.2006.322946 ↗
92. 10.1038/npjsba.2016.2010.1038/npjsba.2016.20 ↗
93. 10.1080/2001409111176710.1080/20014091111767 ↗
94. 10.1007/S00018‐010‐0554‐910.1007/S00018‐010‐0554‐9 ↗
95. 10.1016/j.taap.2007.02.01810.1016/j.taap.2007.02.018 ↗
96. 10.1038/s41576‐023‐00626‐510.1038/s41576‐023‐00626‐5 ↗
97. 10.1007/s10565‐021‐09603‐210.1007/s10565‐021‐09603‐2 ↗
98. 10.1007/S10565‐022‐09730‐410.1007/S10565‐022‐09730‐4 ↗
99. 10.1038/srep4486110.1038/srep44861 ↗
100. 10.1111/ejn.1616510.1111/ejn.16165 ↗