journal article·2026-06Open access

Global Nitrogen Deposition Promotes Carbon Sink Formation in Terrestrial Ecosystems

Lei Li, Mingyu Xie, Nan Jia, Li‐Dong Mo, Qiang Yu, Fanjiang Zeng, Xiangyi Li

Advanced Science· Volume 13· Issue 33

Abstract

ABSTRACT Nitrogen (N) deposition has been shown to alleviate N limitations on ecosystem productivity, increasing the terrestrial carbon (C) sink. Accurately quantifying the fate of deposited N is essential for reliably estimating its contribution to the global C sink. We conducted an extensive analysis and modeling of 829 observational data points to elucidate the retention patterns of reduced N (NH x ) and oxidized N (NO y ) deposited in ecosystems and evaluate their contributions to terrestrial C sinks via stoichiometric scaling. Our results indicate that, on average, 36% of deposited N is retained in terrestrial ecosystems. Globally, the retention of deposited N amounted to 39.15 Tg N yr −1 , with the retention rates of NH x and NO y being 25.02 and 14.13 Tg N yr −1 , respectively. Notably, a smaller amount of deposited N absorbed by trees was retained in woody tissues than in nonwoody tissues. Consequently, the estimated N‐induced C sink in terrestrial ecosystems was 0.88 Pg C yr −1 , accounting for 25.48% of the global terrestrial C sink. This study highlights the global distribution patterns of deposited N retention and the induced biome‐specific C sink, underscoring the importance of incorporating pool‐specific C:N stoichiometry for accurately quantifying ecosystem‐scale carbon sequestration in global modeling.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics · Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics · Plant responses to elevated CO2

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography Chinese Academy of Sciences Urumqi P. R. China

Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Desert Plant Roots Ecology and Vegetation Restoration Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography Chinese Academy of Sciences Urumqi P. R. China

Cele National Station of Observation and Research for Desert‐Grassland Ecosystems Cele P. R. China

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing P. R. China

Department of Plant Biology and Ecology College of Life Science Nankai University Tianjin P. R. China

School of Grassland Science Beijing Forestry University Beijing P. R. China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region · Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.113667410.1126/science.1136674 ↗
2. 10.1038/ngeo23010.1038/ngeo230 ↗
3. 10.1029/97gb0272910.1029/97gb02729 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.15510.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.155 ↗
5. 10.1111/nph.7003010.1111/nph.70030 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41467‐022‐28345‐110.1038/s41467‐022‐28345‐1 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.11141510.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111415 ↗
8. 10.1073/pnas.253399912310.1073/pnas.2533999123 ↗
9. 10.1890/04‐041510.1890/04‐0415 ↗
10. 10.1038/1820510.1038/18205 ↗
11. 10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-03020410.1146/annurev-environ-102017-030204 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10021‐018‐0275‐810.1007/s10021‐018‐0275‐8 ↗
13. 10.1073/pnas.152573611310.1073/pnas.1525736113 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.09.00110.1016/j.cosust.2014.09.001 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41561‐019‐0530‐410.1038/s41561‐019‐0530‐4 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.08.04110.1016/j.envpol.2018.08.041 ↗
17. 10.1111/gcb.1376610.1111/gcb.13766 ↗
18. 10.1111/gcb.1386210.1111/gcb.13862 ↗
19. 10.5194/essd‐14‐4811‐202210.5194/essd‐14‐4811‐2022 ↗
20. 10.1002/eap.192010.1002/eap.1920 ↗
21. 10.1016/s0038‐0717(98)00172‐210.1016/s0038‐0717(98)00172‐2 ↗
22. Marschner P. · 2012
23. 10.1016/S1002-0160(06)60106-910.1016/S1002-0160(06)60106-9 ↗
24. 10.1111/j.1365‐2486.2010.02322.x10.1111/j.1365‐2486.2010.02322.x ↗
25. 10.1890/11‐1146.110.1890/11‐1146.1 ↗
26. 10.1093/treephys/tpt12110.1093/treephys/tpt121 ↗
27. 10.1579/0044-7447-31.2.9710.1579/0044-7447-31.2.97 ↗
28. 10.1111/gcb.1552610.1111/gcb.15526 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.01.02910.1016/j.foreco.2018.01.029 ↗
30. 10.1111/j.1461‐0248.2011.01701.x10.1111/j.1461‐0248.2011.01701.x ↗
31. 10.1098/rstb.2013.011910.1098/rstb.2013.0119 ↗
32. 10.1029/2009gb00351910.1029/2009gb003519 ↗
33. 10.1029/2008gb00329110.1029/2008gb003291 ↗
34. 10.1029/2018gb00592210.1029/2018gb005922 ↗
35. 10.1111/gcb.7041310.1111/gcb.70413 ↗
36. 10.1111/nph.7076810.1111/nph.70768 ↗
37. 10.1073/pnas.240139812110.1073/pnas.2401398121 ↗
38. 10.1111/gcb.1497010.1111/gcb.14970 ↗
39. 10.1111/gcb.1686910.1111/gcb.16869 ↗
40. 10.1038/s41467‐025‐67203‐810.1038/s41467‐025‐67203‐8 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.oneear.2024.10.00710.1016/j.oneear.2024.10.007 ↗
42. 10.1073/pnas.202079011810.1073/pnas.2020790118 ↗
43. 10.1111/gcb.1266510.1111/gcb.12665 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41467‐019‐13656‐710.1038/s41467‐019‐13656‐7 ↗
45. 10.1111/j.1365‐2486.2009.02102.x10.1111/j.1365‐2486.2009.02102.x ↗
46. 10.1038/s41561‐022‐01080‐410.1038/s41561‐022‐01080‐4 ↗
47. 10.1111/gcb.1615910.1111/gcb.16159 ↗
48. 10.1038/s41467‐024‐55606‐y10.1038/s41467‐024‐55606‐y ↗
49. 10.5194/acp‐13‐7997‐201310.5194/acp‐13‐7997‐2013 ↗
50. 10.1073/pnas.212199811910.1073/pnas.2121998119 ↗
51. 10.1038/nature0584710.1038/nature05847 ↗
52. 10.1007/s10533‐020‐00750‐y10.1007/s10533‐020‐00750‐y ↗
53. 10.1007/s10533‐024‐01135‐110.1007/s10533‐024‐01135‐1 ↗
54. 10.1139/a05‐01510.1139/a05‐015 ↗
55. 10.1002/fee.194910.1002/fee.1949 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.11.02410.1016/j.foreco.2010.11.024 ↗
57. 10.1111/gcb.1680310.1111/gcb.16803 ↗
58. 10.1111/nph.1354710.1111/nph.13547 ↗
59. 10.1111/j.1365‐2486.2011.02407.x10.1111/j.1365‐2486.2011.02407.x ↗
60. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.13210.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.132 ↗
61. 10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-310.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3 ↗
62. 10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-710.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7 ↗
63. M.Kuhn caret: Classification and Regression Training accessed on January 25 2022 https://cran.r‐project.org/package=caret(2020).
64. A Survey of Forecast Error Measures