Structural Eigenmodes of the Brain to Improve the Source Localization of EEG: Application to Epileptiform Activity
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT A fundamental view of neuroscience is that, in addition to neuronal activity, the structure of the brain constrains and explains brain function. An alluring formalism in computational neuroscience has been the generation of structural eigenmodes of neural activity from a matrix representing the anatomy of the brain. Traditionally, brain connectomics has been the gold standard for the coupling between structure and function. However, it has recently been suggested that simpler brain geometry can provide more explanatory power in fMRI. An adjacent modality is the source localization problem of EEG, which aims to identify the underlying generators of EEG recordings. The underdetermined nature of the problem requires sufficient constraints to produce realistic and unique solutions of source activity. In this work, a simple framework for incorporating different forms of structural brain eigenmodes to constrain the source localization problem in epilepsy is presented. Geometric eigenmodes were found to be able to reconstruct the spread of a seizure through the brain slightly better than connectome eigenmodes, and both types of structural modes significantly outperformed commonly used approaches.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Functional Brain Connectivity Studies · Neural dynamics and brain function · Neurological disorders and treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical Engineering The University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia
Graeme Clark Institute The University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia
National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore
Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences INSERM Grenoble (La Tronche) France
Department of Data Science & AI Monash University Melbourne Australia
Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne The University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia
Funding
Australian Research Council
References (82)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30454-X10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30454-X ↗
2. 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00383-X10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00383-X ↗
3. 10.2176/nmc.st.2020-017610.2176/nmc.st.2020-0176 ↗
4. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195050387.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780195050387.001.0001 ↗
5. 10.1146/annurev‐bioeng‐062117‐12085310.1146/annurev‐bioeng‐062117‐120853 ↗
6. 10.1186/1743‐0003‐4‐4610.1186/1743‐0003‐4‐46 ↗
7. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:4<182::AID-HBM3>3.0.CO;2-M10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:4<182::AID-HBM3>3.0.CO;2-M ↗
8. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.00310.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.003 ↗
9. Geometric Constraints on Human Brain Function
10. 10.1093/cercor/bhaf03910.1093/cercor/bhaf039 ↗
11. A.Milloz J.Vogel A.Olsen et al. “Multiscale Quantification of Hemispheric Asymmetry in Cortical Maps Using Geometric Eigenmodes ” in2025 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)(April 2025):1–5 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10980761.10.1109/ISBI60581.2025.10980761 ↗
12. A.Boyes P. E.Schwenn Z. Y.Shan et al. “Geometric Eigenmode Brain Fingerprinting and Its Longitudinal Associations with Adolescent Mental Health and Wellbeing ” (August 2024) https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.08.08.607260v1.10.1101/2024.08.08.607260 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41467-019-12765-710.1038/s41467-019-12765-7 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.05.01210.1016/j.clinph.2023.05.012 ↗
15. L.Sina Mansour H.Behjat D. V.De Ville R. E.Smith B. T.Yeo andA.Zalesky “Eigenmodes of the Brain: Revisiting Connectomics and Geometry ” (April 2024) http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2024.04.16.589843.10.1101/2024.04.16.589843 ↗
16. J.Faskowitz D.Moyer D. A.Handwerker et al. “Commentary on Pang et al. (2023) Nature ” (July 2023) https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.07.20.549785v1.
17. 10.1016/j.chaos.2025.11650010.1016/j.chaos.2025.116500 ↗
18. 10.1007/S11431‐024‐2828‐010.1007/S11431‐024‐2828‐0 ↗
19. S.Wang C.Wei K.Lou D.Gu andQ.Liu “Advancing EEG/MEG Source Imaging with Geometric‐Informed Basis Functions ” in2024 46th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)(July 2024):1–4 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10782170/.10.1109/EMBC53108.2024.10782170 ↗
20. 10.1002/hbm.2663810.1002/hbm.26638 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41598-022-14500-710.1038/s41598-022-14500-7 ↗
22. 10.1073/pnas.220112811910.1073/pnas.2201128119 ↗
23. 10.1093/brain/awz01510.1093/brain/awz015 ↗
24. 10.1088/1361‐6420/ad14a110.1088/1361‐6420/ad14a1 ↗
25. 10.1371/journal.pone.004443910.1371/journal.pone.0044439 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.clinph.2025.04.00910.1016/j.clinph.2025.04.009 ↗
27. 10.3389/fnins.2021.56991810.3389/fnins.2021.569918 ↗
28. M.Morik A.Hashemi K.‐R.Müller S.Haufe andS.Nakajima “Enhancing Brain Source Reconstruction Through Physics‐Informed 3D Neural Networks ” (2024) https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00143.
29. 10.1038/s41593-018-0195-010.1038/s41593-018-0195-0 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.01810210.1103/PhysRevLett.94.018102 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41583-018-0071-710.1038/s41583-018-0071-7 ↗
32. 10.1371/journal.pbio.300123410.1371/journal.pbio.3001234 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41467-024-47860-x10.1038/s41467-024-47860-x ↗
34. 10.3389/fncom.2022.84733610.3389/fncom.2022.847336 ↗
35. 10.1371/journal.pone.027290210.1371/journal.pone.0272902 ↗
36. 10.1088/1741‐2552/add83f10.1088/1741‐2552/add83f ↗
37. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.04110.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.041 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.02110.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.12001010.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120010 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.12710.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.127 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.11769510.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117695 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.12040710.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120407 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.11613710.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116137 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.06110.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.061 ↗
45. Dhollander T. · 2016
46. Tournier J. D. · 2010
47. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.00510.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.005 ↗
48. B.He T.Musha Y.Okamoto S.Homma Y.Nakajima andT.Sato “Electric Dipole Tracing in the Brain by Means of the Boundary Element Method and Its Accuracy ”IEEE Transactions on Biomedical EngineeringBME‐34 no.6(June 1987):406–414.10.1109/TBME.1987.326056 ↗
49. 10.1186/1475‐925X‐9‐4510.1186/1475‐925X‐9‐45 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.02710.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.027 ↗
51. 10.1007/978-3-319-14947-910.1007/978-3-319-14947-9 ↗
52. 10.1093/brain/awu13310.1093/brain/awu133 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.04910.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.049 ↗
54. 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00008-X10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00008-X ↗
55. 10.1126/scitranslmed.abp898210.1126/scitranslmed.abp8982 ↗
56. 10.1038/s41467-018-02973-y10.1038/s41467-018-02973-y ↗
57. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.00210.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.002 ↗
58. 10.3389/fninf.2013.0001010.3389/fninf.2013.00010 ↗
59. 10.1523/ENEURO.0485-18.201910.1523/ENEURO.0485-18.2019 ↗
60. 10.1109/TSMC.1979.431007610.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 ↗
61. 10.1002/advs.20240524610.1002/advs.202405246 ↗
62. 10.1162/IMAG.a.7110.1162/IMAG.a.71 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.cam.2005.09.02710.1016/j.cam.2005.09.027 ↗
64. 10.1038/s41598-022-19994-910.1038/s41598-022-19994-9 ↗
65. 10.1002/jmri.2718810.1002/jmri.27188 ↗
66. P.Nakkiran G.Kaplun Y.Bansal T.Yang B.Barak andI.Sutskever “Deep Double Descent ” (January 2020) https://openai.com/index/deep‐double‐descent/.
67. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.01320110.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.013201 ↗
68. 10.3389/fneur.2019.0125010.3389/fneur.2019.01250 ↗
69. 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.02190310.1103/PhysRevE.63.021903 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2010.03.00810.1016/j.euroneuro.2010.03.008 ↗
71. 10.1103/PhysRevE.96.03241310.1103/PhysRevE.96.032413 ↗
72. 10.1088/1741‐2552/ab8b2b10.1088/1741‐2552/ab8b2b ↗
73. Prince S. J. · 2023
74. 10.1093/brain/awaf02610.1093/brain/awaf026 ↗
75. 10.7150/thno.9982010.7150/thno.99820 ↗
76. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0338-22.202210.1523/JNEUROSCI.0338-22.2022 ↗
77. 10.1038/ncomms1109810.1038/ncomms11098 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.03.01510.1016/j.nbd.2019.03.015 ↗
79. 10.3389/fneur.2022.83789310.3389/fneur.2022.837893 ↗
80. 10.1038/s41467-022-28640-x10.1038/s41467-022-28640-x ↗
81. 10.7554/eLife.5563210.7554/eLife.55632 ↗
82. 10.1038/s42003-025-08782-610.1038/s42003-025-08782-6 ↗