journal article·2026-05Open access

Multicohort Validation of Gut Microbiome Signatures for Cholangiocarcinoma Diagnosis and Functional Characterization of Bifidobacterium Pseudocatenulatum

Benchen Rao, Jianwen Jiang, Ruiqing Zhang, Dongya Zhang, Chenchen Zhang, Ang Li, Haifeng Lu, Hua Zhang, Lin Zhou, Wenzhi Guo, Peihao Wen, Jianfeng Xue, Jie Pan, Tuerganaili Aji, Zhou Lan, Xianzhi Jiang, Shusen Zheng, Zujiang Yu, Zhigang Ren

Advanced Science· Volume 13· Issue 27

Abstract

ABSTRACT Growing evidence suggests a role for the gut microbiome in progression of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), however, its diagnostic and therapeutic potential remains incompletely characterized. Here, metagenomic sequencing was performed on fecal samples ( n = 785) from individuals across East, Central, and Northwestern China. Gut microbial dysbiosis in CCA was characterized by depletion of short‐chain fatty acids‐producing species and enrichment of potential pathobionts ( Klebsiella aerogenes , Clostridium symbiosum ). Diagnostic models built using species‐level markers demonstrated superior performance, compared to pathway‐based models, achieving area under the curve (AUC) values of 98.63% and 99.42% in the discovery cohort, with robust cross‐regional validation (AUC = 80.89% and 80.43%). The model effectively distinguished CCA from hepatocellular carcinoma (AUC = 97.86%) and liver fibrosis (AUC = 98.73%) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (mean AUC = 96.86%). Analysis of public datasets encompassing 6847 samples across 31 studies and 11 disease states revealed moderate disease specificity influenced by biomarker overlap across conditions. Mechanistically, depleted Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum suppressed CCA progression, associated with inhibition of the PI3K‐AKT‐mTOR pathway. Collectively, this study supports the potential of fecal metagenomic signatures as a complementary noninvasive aid for CCA detection, and provides functional evidence for a candidate protective microbe.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies · Gut microbiota and health · Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Infectious Diseases State Key Laboratory of Antiviral Drugs Pingyuan Laboratory the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou China

Gene Hospital of Henan Province/Precision Medicine Center the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou China

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery The First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine Hangzhou China

Department of Hepatobiliary and Echinococcosis Surgery Digestive and Vascular Surgery Center First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University Urumqi China

Microbiome Research Center Moon (Guangzhou) Biotech Ltd Guangzhou China

State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases The First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine Hangzhou, Zhejiang province China

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3322/caac.2175910.3322/caac.21759 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.03.01310.1016/j.jhep.2019.03.013 ↗
3. 10.1038/nrgastro.2011.13110.1038/nrgastro.2011.131 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.08.01310.1016/j.jhep.2008.08.013 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.04.00310.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.04.003 ↗
6. 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.10.01310.1053/j.gastro.2013.10.013 ↗
7. 10.1136/egastro‐2023‐10002010.1136/egastro‐2023‐100020 ↗
8. 10.1056/NEJMoa090872110.1056/NEJMoa0908721 ↗
9. 10.1136/egastro‐2023‐10001010.1136/egastro‐2023‐100010 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41575‐018‐0011‐z10.1038/s41575‐018‐0011‐z ↗
11. 10.1038/s41575‐023‐00771‐610.1038/s41575‐023‐00771‐6 ↗
12. 10.1186/1471‐2164‐14‐66910.1186/1471‐2164‐14‐669 ↗
13. 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.12.05810.1053/j.gastro.2020.12.058 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.04.03410.1016/j.ebiom.2016.04.034 ↗
15. 10.1002/hep.3031910.1002/hep.30319 ↗
16. 10.1136/gutjnl‐2017‐31508410.1136/gutjnl‐2017‐315084 ↗
17. 10.1002/hep.3085210.1002/hep.30852 ↗
18. 10.3389/fcimb.2021.75179510.3389/fcimb.2021.751795 ↗
19. 10.1038/nature1234710.1038/nature12347 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41392‐020‐00446‐710.1038/s41392‐020‐00446‐7 ↗
21. 10.1136/gutjnl‐2020‐32278010.1136/gutjnl‐2020‐322780 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41591‐018‐0164‐x10.1038/s41591‐018‐0164‐x ↗
23. 10.1136/gutjnl‐2021‐32475510.1136/gutjnl‐2021‐324755 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41467‐017‐01973‐810.1038/s41467‐017‐01973‐8 ↗
25. 10.1136/gutjnl‐2022‐32825610.1136/gutjnl‐2022‐328256 ↗
26. 10.1038/nature1767210.1038/nature17672 ↗
27. 10.1038/nri.2017.12110.1038/nri.2017.121 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cell.2024.09.01910.1016/j.cell.2024.09.019 ↗
29. 10.1136/gutjnl‐2023‐33002910.1136/gutjnl‐2023‐330029 ↗
30. 10.1136/gutjnl‐2015‐30980010.1136/gutjnl‐2015‐309800 ↗
31. 10.1038/nature1356810.1038/nature13568 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.00710.1016/j.cell.2016.04.007 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0016‐5085(03)00672‐310.1016/S0016‐5085(03)00672‐3 ↗
34. 10.1073/pnas.191597811610.1073/pnas.1915978116 ↗
35. 10.1074/jbc.M111.26946410.1074/jbc.M111.269464 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.redox.2022.10245210.1016/j.redox.2022.102452 ↗
37. 10.1186/s12964‐022‐00890‐810.1186/s12964‐022‐00890‐8 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.11556810.1016/j.biopha.2023.115568 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.10428510.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104285 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.04.03810.1016/j.jhep.2022.04.038 ↗
41. 10.1158/0008‐5472.CAN‐24‐008810.1158/0008‐5472.CAN‐24‐0088 ↗
42. 10.1136/gutjnl‐2024‐33363210.1136/gutjnl‐2024‐333632 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41591‐019‐0406‐610.1038/s41591‐019‐0406‐6 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41591‐019‐0405‐710.1038/s41591‐019‐0405‐7 ↗
45. 10.1080/19490976.2021.188684410.1080/19490976.2021.1886844 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.11.00110.1016/j.ctrv.2018.11.001 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.05.00110.1016/j.canlet.2017.05.001 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.04.00110.1016/j.cmet.2017.04.001 ↗
49. 10.1038/s41591‐018‐0061‐310.1038/s41591‐018‐0061‐3 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.01.00510.1016/j.cmet.2018.01.005 ↗
51. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty56010.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 ↗
52. 10.7554/eLife.6508810.7554/eLife.65088 ↗
53. 10.1172/JCI6321210.1172/JCI63212 ↗
54. G. L. S.Jari Oksanen F.Guillaume Blanchet R.Kindt et al. “Daniel Borcard Vegan: Community Ecology Package ”2019. Available: https://CRAN.R‐project.org/package=vegan accessed.
55. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100944210.1371/journal.pcbi.1009442 ↗
56. 10.1007/s13238‐020‐00724‐810.1007/s13238‐020‐00724‐8 ↗
57. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa27610.1093/bioinformatics/btaa276 ↗
58. 10.1186/s13059‐022‐02753‐410.1186/s13059‐022‐02753‐4 ↗
59. 10.1186/gb‐2011‐12‐6‐r6010.1186/gb‐2011‐12‐6‐r60 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.tjog.2024.10.01410.1016/j.tjog.2024.10.014 ↗
61. 10.1136/gpsych‐2022‐10100310.1136/gpsych‐2022‐101003 ↗