journal article·2026-04Open access

CO Spillover Is Not a Promoter for C─C Bond Formation in CO 2 Electroreduction on Cu‐Ag Bimetallic Catalysts

Beining Xu, Zhaochun Liu, Xinjuan Du, Wen Yan, Yunsong Yu, Ionut Tranca, Frederik Tielens, Ming Ma

Advanced Science· Volume 13· Issue 24

Abstract

ABSTRACT Cu‐based bimetallic catalysts have been shown to improve the multi‐carbon (C 2+ ) selectivity in CO 2 electroreduction, with the assumption that CO spillover from the CO‐selective catalysts to adjacent Cu domains via their bimetallic interface promotes C–C coupling. Here, through systematically controlling the Cu‐Ag interface densities of bimetallic catalysts, we report that CO spillover via the bimetallic interface is unlikely to enhance the formation of C 2+ products. Conversely, the abundant Cu‐Ag interface preferentially promotes CH 4 formation while suppressing C─C bond formation. CO stripping studies also reveal that the Cu‐Ag interface does not favor C─C coupling. Further computational modelling suggests that Cu‐Ag bimetallic interface significantly enhances the energy barrier of CO dimerization while lowering the energy barrier for * CO hydrogenation toward CH 4 , thus inhibiting C─C coupling toward C 2+ products while facilitating CH 4 formation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Catalysts for Methane Reforming · Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemical Engineering and Technology Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an P. R. China

General Chemistry (ALGC) Materials Modelling Group Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) Brussels Belgium

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20180716610.1002/adma.201807166 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.aav350610.1126/science.aav3506 ↗
3. 10.1038/nature1830710.1038/nature18307 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41929-020-00547-010.1038/s41929-020-00547-0 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41560-019-0450-y10.1038/s41560-019-0450-y ↗
6. 10.1021/jacs.3c1101310.1021/jacs.3c11013 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41929-018-0084-710.1038/s41929-018-0084-7 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41929-019-0383-710.1038/s41929-019-0383-7 ↗
9. 10.1039/c2ee21234j10.1039/c2ee21234j ↗
10. 10.1021/cr300463y10.1021/cr300463y ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0070510.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41586-022-05540-010.1038/s41586-022-05540-0 ↗
13. 10.1002/anie.20240118510.1002/anie.202401185 ↗
14. 10.1021/jacs.9b0212410.1021/jacs.9b02124 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20200579810.1002/adma.202005798 ↗
16. 10.1021/jacs.5c0146410.1021/jacs.5c01464 ↗
17. 10.1021/jacs.8b1238110.1021/jacs.8b12381 ↗
18. 10.1021/jacs.6b1074010.1021/jacs.6b10740 ↗
19. 10.1039/D2SC06359J10.1039/D2SC06359J ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20211060710.1002/adma.202110607 ↗
21. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0282210.1021/acscatal.7b02822 ↗
22. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0531910.1021/acscatal.9b05319 ↗
23. 10.1002/sstr.20220032810.1002/sstr.202200328 ↗
24. 10.1039/D1EE03838A10.1039/D1EE03838A ↗
25. 10.1038/s41929-018-0139-910.1038/s41929-018-0139-9 ↗
26. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0216210.1021/acscatal.6b02162 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsnano.5c0069610.1021/acsnano.5c00696 ↗
28. 10.1021/jacs.3c0963210.1021/jacs.3c09632 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsnano.4c1896710.1021/acsnano.4c18967 ↗
30. 10.1021/jacs.5c0474210.1021/jacs.5c04742 ↗
31. 10.1021/jacs.5c0305710.1021/jacs.5c03057 ↗
32. 10.1021/acscatal.4c0086910.1021/acscatal.4c00869 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0128810.1021/acsenergylett.2c01288 ↗
34. 10.1073/pnas.221417512010.1073/pnas.2214175120 ↗
35. 10.1002/anie.20201707010.1002/anie.202017070 ↗
36. 10.1002/adfm.20241033910.1002/adfm.202410339 ↗
37. 10.1002/smll.20210229310.1002/smll.202102293 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.07.00910.1016/j.joule.2020.07.009 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41929-018-0133-210.1038/s41929-018-0133-2 ↗
40. 10.1021/acscatal.5b0258010.1021/acscatal.5b02580 ↗
41. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0043910.1021/acscatal.6b00439 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.02.02310.1016/j.nanoen.2017.02.023 ↗
43. 10.1021/ja106389k10.1021/ja106389k ↗
44. 10.1002/anie.20242474910.1002/anie.202424749 ↗
45. 10.1021/jacs.1c0218610.1021/jacs.1c02186 ↗
46. 10.1021/jacs.3c0919310.1021/jacs.3c09193 ↗
47. 10.1016/S1872-2067(23)64476-610.1016/S1872-2067(23)64476-6 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.electacta.2024.14440910.1016/j.electacta.2024.144409 ↗
49. 10.1021/acscatal.5c0277410.1021/acscatal.5c02774 ↗
50. 10.1038/ncomms1543810.1038/ncomms15438 ↗
51. 10.1021/jacs.9b0741510.1021/jacs.9b07415 ↗
52. 10.1021/acscatal.2c0427910.1021/acscatal.2c04279 ↗
53. 10.1021/jacs.3c0046710.1021/jacs.3c00467 ↗
54. 10.1038/s41467-024-54630-210.1038/s41467-024-54630-2 ↗
55. 10.1002/anie.20241706610.1002/anie.202417066 ↗
56. 10.1021/acscatal.3c0346910.1021/acscatal.3c03469 ↗
57. Boosting Electrocatalytic CO2–to–Ethanol Production via Asymmetric C─C Coupling
58. 10.1039/D2CS00441K10.1039/D2CS00441K ↗
59. 10.1002/anie.20201718110.1002/anie.202017181 ↗
60. 10.1038/s41467-024-54630-210.1038/s41467-024-54630-2 ↗
61. Dynamic Restructuring of Epitaxial Au–Cu Biphasic Interface for Tandem CO2‐to‐C2+ Alcohol Conversion
62. 10.1021/jacs.0c0185910.1021/jacs.0c01859 ↗