Developing a Single‐Cell Spatial Transcriptomics Workflow for In Vivo Evaluation of Implanted Biomaterials
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT In vivo evaluation of biomaterials largely relies on histology to assess biocompatibility and foreign body responses. While effective for capturing end‐stage outcomes, these methods offer limited insight into the cellular mechanisms driving tissue remodeling, hindering efforts to rationally design better biomaterials. Transcriptomics has revolutionized our understanding of gene activity driving cellular function, yet remains underutilized in biomaterial evaluation. Recent advances in high‐resolution spatial transcriptomics now enable precise mapping of gene expression within tissue, offering detailed insight into cellular states and spatial organization. To align biomaterial research with advances in spatial biology, we develop a bioinformatics workflow for the Xenium platform to analyze in vivo responses to implanted materials. Applying this workflow to evaluate electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds implanted subcutaneously in mice, we identify spatially distinct macrophage and fibroblast subpopulations with unique gene expression profiles. Spatial analyses show shared phenotypic features between co‐localized macrophages and fibroblasts, oriented from the scaffold body to its surface. Gene ontology linked these spatial transitions to functional roles, with immune cell recruitment occurring within the scaffold and fibrosis at the surface. These transitions were not detectable by histology, highlighting spatial transcriptomics as a powerful approach for uncovering cellular dynamics and enabling better biologically‐informed design of biomaterials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Medical Sciences Faculty of Health and Medicine Charles Perkins Centre University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
School of Life and Environmental Sciences Faculty of Science Charles Perkins Centre University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
Funding
NSW Health · Australian Research Council · National Health and Medical Research Council · University of Sydney
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/D4TB00705K10.1039/D4TB00705K ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jacbts.2018.10.00410.1016/j.jacbts.2018.10.004 ↗
3. 10.1002/adhm.20230157110.1002/adhm.202301571 ↗
4. I. O. f. S. (ISO) “t ” International Organization for Standardization (ISO)(2018).
5. 10.1109/rbme.2009.203486510.1109/rbme.2009.2034865 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41576‐023‐00580‐210.1038/s41576‐023‐00580‐2 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41580‐024‐00768‐210.1038/s41580‐024‐00768‐2 ↗
8. 10.3389/abp.2025.1392210.3389/abp.2025.13922 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.celbio.2025.10009910.1016/j.celbio.2025.100099 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cobme.2020.10026010.1016/j.cobme.2020.100260 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41467‐023‐41608‐910.1038/s41467‐023‐41608‐9 ↗
12. 10.1088/1741‐2552/ad593610.1088/1741‐2552/ad5936 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41592‐025‐02617‐210.1038/s41592‐025‐02617‐2 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.00210.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.002 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41587‐023‐01767‐y10.1038/s41587‐023‐01767‐y ↗
16. 10.1038/s41586‐019‐0969‐x10.1038/s41586‐019‐0969‐x ↗
17. 10.1002/cpz1.9010.1002/cpz1.90 ↗
18. 10.1371/journal.pone.029423610.1371/journal.pone.0294236 ↗
19. 10.1093/brain/awad25610.1093/brain/awad256 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00262‐022‐03188‐310.1007/s00262‐022‐03188‐3 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2023.11365110.1016/j.yexcr.2023.113651 ↗
22. 10.1080/15548627.2019.156991610.1080/15548627.2019.1569916 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.03810.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.038 ↗
24. 10.3389/fimmu.2024.146191910.3389/fimmu.2024.1461919 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.02410.1016/j.cell.2021.06.024 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41392‐024‐02049‐y10.1038/s41392‐024‐02049‐y ↗
27. 10.1590/abd1806‐4841.2016474110.1590/abd1806‐4841.20164741 ↗
28. 10.1172/JCI9355710.1172/JCI93557 ↗