NanoLoop: A Deep Learning Framework Leveraging Nanopore Sequencing for Chromatin Loop Prediction
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Chromatin loops play a crucial role in gene regulation and cellular function, providing key insights into understanding the 3D structure of the genome and its impact on cellular homeostasis. Nanopore sequencing technology, with its advantages in simultaneously detecting sequences and methylation patterns, brings new opportunities for studying 3D genome structures. We introduce NanoLoop, the first algorithmic framework attempting to predict genome‐wide chromatin interactions using Nanopore data. In experiments across four human lymphoblastoid cell lines, NanoLoop demonstrated excellent predictive performance and cross‐cell line generalization capabilities. We also discovered four distinct methylation patterns at loop anchors that influence histone modification levels and determine various loop types. NanoLoop further predicted previously uncharacterized long‐range chromatin loops, highlighting the potential link between DNA methylation and 3D genome organization and providing new insights into the complex regulatory relationships between epigenetic modifications and 3D genome organization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics · Epigenetics and DNA Methylation · Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Computer Science and Engineering Central South University Changsha China
Cardiovascular Research Center Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA
Cardiovascular Disease Initiative The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard Cambridge Massachusetts USA
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41586‐019‐0949‐110.1038/s41586‐019‐0949‐1 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.01410.1016/j.cell.2011.12.014 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.02410.1016/j.cell.2015.11.024 ↗
4. 10.1093/nar/gkac82410.1093/nar/gkac824 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.00810.1016/j.cell.2017.11.008 ↗
6. 10.1038/nrg.2016.11210.1038/nrg.2016.112 ↗
7. 10.1128/MMBR.00006‐1510.1128/MMBR.00006‐15 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.06.01710.1016/j.semcdb.2016.06.017 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.118136910.1126/science.1181369 ↗
10. 10.1038/nature0849710.1038/nature08497 ↗
11. 10.1038/cr.2016.13710.1038/cr.2016.137 ↗
12. 10.1038/nmeth.399910.1038/nmeth.3999 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41467‐022‐31337‐w10.1038/s41467‐022‐31337‐w ↗
14. 10.1038/s41588‐018‐0111‐210.1038/s41588‐018‐0111‐2 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41467‐018‐06961‐010.1038/s41467‐018‐06961‐0 ↗
16. scHiClassifier: A Deep Learning Framework for Cell Type Prediction by Fusing Multiple Feature Sets from Single‐Cell Hi‐C Data
17. 10.1038/s41467‐020‐17239‐910.1038/s41467‐020‐17239‐9 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41592‐021‐01231‐210.1038/s41592‐021‐01231‐2 ↗
19. 10.1093/gigascience/giac06110.1093/gigascience/giac061 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41588‐022‐01116‐w10.1038/s41588‐022‐01116‐w ↗
21. 10.1109/JBHI.2023.329229910.1109/JBHI.2023.3292299 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41594‐024‐01241‐610.1038/s41594‐024‐01241‐6 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41467‐021‐23142‐810.1038/s41467‐021‐23142‐8 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41592‐019‐0547‐z10.1038/s41592‐019‐0547‐z ↗
25. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.101130710.1371/journal.pcbi.1011307 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41467‐018‐06664‐610.1038/s41467‐018‐06664‐6 ↗
27. 10.1038/ng.395010.1038/ng.3950 ↗
28. Global View of Enhancer‐Promoter Interactome in Human Cells
29. 10.1038/ng.353910.1038/ng.3539 ↗
30. 10.21037/tp.2020.03.0610.21037/tp.2020.03.06 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41587‐020‐0407‐510.1038/s41587‐020‐0407‐5 ↗
32. 10.3390/bios1107021410.3390/bios11070214 ↗
33. 10.1111/dgd.1260810.1111/dgd.12608 ↗
34. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz27610.1093/bioinformatics/btz276 ↗
35. 10.1186/s13059-016-1103-010.1186/s13059-016-1103-0 ↗
36. 10.1038/nmeth.418910.1038/nmeth.4189 ↗
37. 10.1038/s41598‐025‐99882‐010.1038/s41598‐025‐99882‐0 ↗
38. 10.1186/s12864-018-5372-810.1186/s12864-018-5372-8 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41592‐019‐0502‐z10.1038/s41592‐019‐0502‐z ↗
40. 10.1038/ng.380510.1038/ng.3805 ↗
41. 10.1101/gr.104695.10910.1101/gr.104695.109 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.01810.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.018 ↗
43. 10.1093/nar/gkz83610.1093/nar/gkz836 ↗
44. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100662510.1371/journal.pcbi.1006625 ↗
45. 10.1186/s13059‐021‐02453‐510.1186/s13059‐021‐02453‐5 ↗
46. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac57510.1093/bioinformatics/btac575 ↗
47. 10.1089/cmb.2020.022510.1089/cmb.2020.0225 ↗
48. 10.1038/s41587-024-02224-010.1038/s41587-024-02224-0 ↗
49. 10.1038/s41467-024-47678-710.1038/s41467-024-47678-7 ↗
50. 10.1038/s41467‐024‐48370‐610.1038/s41467‐024‐48370‐6 ↗
51. 10.1186/s13059‐022‐02611‐310.1186/s13059‐022‐02611‐3 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.neuron.2024.11.00610.1016/j.neuron.2024.11.006 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.06.04510.1016/j.molcel.2019.06.045 ↗
54. 10.1038/s43018‐024‐00823‐z10.1038/s43018‐024‐00823‐z ↗
55. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2013.08.00110.1016/j.bbagrm.2013.08.001 ↗
56. 10.1038/nrg234110.1038/nrg2341 ↗
57. 10.1038/s41586‐020‐03182‐810.1038/s41586‐020‐03182‐8 ↗
58. 10.1038/s42003‐021‐02939‐910.1038/s42003‐021‐02939‐9 ↗
59. 10.1038/nature1230310.1038/nature12303 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.04.01810.1016/j.molcel.2020.04.018 ↗
61. 10.1038/s41592‐020‐00971‐x10.1038/s41592‐020‐00971‐x ↗
62. 10.1016/j.cels.2016.07.00210.1016/j.cels.2016.07.002 ↗