journal article·2026-04Open access

Circular Potential of Lithium‐Ion Battery Recycling Slags: Quantifying Microstructure and Elemental Distribution for a Holistic Valorization

Peter Cornelius Gantz, Charlize Alexia Senkyr, Rüdiger Kilian, Andreas Neumann, Maximilian Korges, Daniel A. Frick, Hans Roggendorf, Ralf Wehrspohn, Stefan Stöber, Christiane Stephan‐Scherb

Advanced Science· Volume 13· Issue 22

Abstract

ABSTRACT Extractive pyrometallurgy is an established process for recycling lithium‐ion batteries (LIB). One approach to recover lithium from slags produced by pyrometallurgical recycling of LIB involves accumulating lithium in an engineered artificial mineral (EnAM) facilitating recovery. β‐Eucryptite (LiAlSiO 4 ) is a promising EnAM‐candidate as it is chemically similar to the primary lithium ore spodumene (LiAlSi 2 O 6 ) making co‐processing a viable option. However, for economic recycling the β‐eucryptite must have a high lithium content, a high purity, and display a favorable microstructure. The presented work aims to quantify all three parameters. An industrial pyrometallurgical slag was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (LA‐ICP‐MS). The analyzed β‐eucryptite shows a high lithium content of 5.45 mass % while containing only low amounts of iron (0.64 mass %) and calcium (0.2 mass %). However, small mean grain sizes (< 21 µm) and unfavorable grain shapes impede the separation of β‐eucryptite. It was discovered that chromium and vanadium were accumulated in spinel phases of the chromite‐coulsonite solid solution series. Producing a Cr, V‐bearing spinel concentrate would enable the recycling of both metals as well as improving the quality of the residual lithium‐depleted slag as a by‐product.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Extraction and Separation Processes · Bauxite Residue and Utilization · Metal Extraction and Bioleaching

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute for Geosciences and Geography Martin‐Luther‐University Halle‐Wittenberg Halle (Saale) Germany

ITEL – Institute for Technologies and Economics of Lithium GmbH Halle (Saale) Germany

Institute for Geosciences University of Potsdam Potsdam‐Golm Germany

Institute for Geosciences Kiel University Kiel Germany

Institute for Physics Martin‐Luther‐University Halle‐Wittenberg Halle (Saale) Germany

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.gsf.2024.10186810.1016/j.gsf.2024.101868 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.08.06910.1016/j.egyr.2023.08.069 ↗
3. EU REGULATION (EU) 2023/1542 of the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT and of the COUNCIL of12 July 2023concerning Batteries and Waste Batteries amending Directive 2008/98/EC and Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and repealing Directive 2006/66/EC: 2023/1542 2023.
4. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.22962210.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229622 ↗
5. 10.1007/s12613‐024‐2907‐710.1007/s12613‐024‐2907‐7 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsomega.4c0072310.1021/acsomega.4c00723 ↗
7. 10.3390/min1402013010.3390/min14020130 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.mineng.2024.10891810.1016/j.mineng.2024.108918 ↗
9. 10.1002/adem.20230209110.1002/adem.202302091 ↗
10. 10.1002/aesr.20240033810.1002/aesr.202400338 ↗
11. 10.1063/5.010755010.1063/5.0107550 ↗
12. 10.1002/aenm.20230188610.1002/aenm.202301886 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.mineng.2024.10870610.1016/j.mineng.2024.108706 ↗
14. 10.3390/su1619851310.3390/su16198513 ↗
15. 10.3390/met1307121310.3390/met13071213 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13709610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137096 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.mineng.2018.11.02310.1016/j.mineng.2018.11.023 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.10570210.1016/j.rineng.2025.105702 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijms.2011.01.00810.1016/j.ijms.2011.01.008 ↗
20. 10.1111/j.1751‐908X.2011.00120.x10.1111/j.1751‐908X.2011.00120.x ↗
21. 10.1039/C4JA00007B10.1039/C4JA00007B ↗
22. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.08.00410.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.08.004 ↗
23. C. A.NorrisandL.Danyushevshy “Towards Estimating the Complete Uncertainty Budget of Quantified Results Measured by LA‐ICP‐MS ” presented atGoldschmidtBoston 2018.
24. 10.1111/j.1751‐908X.2005.tb00904.x10.1111/j.1751‐908X.2005.tb00904.x ↗
25. 10.1038/nmeth.201910.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.mineng.2015.03.02110.1016/j.mineng.2015.03.021 ↗
27. 10.1007/978-3-642-10343-810.1007/978-3-642-10343-8 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.tecto.2006.05.02010.1016/j.tecto.2006.05.020 ↗
29. R.Kilian Jazy Macros https://github.com/kilir/Jazy_macros2025.
30. 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2024.10660710.1016/j.sedgeo.2024.106607 ↗
31. J.Brocher “biovoxxel/BioVoxxel‐Toolbox: BioVoxxel Toolbox v2.6.0”(2023) accessed April 2025 https://zenodo.org/records/10050002.
32. 10.3390/min1204042710.3390/min12040427 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0081-1947(08)60135-610.1016/S0081-1947(08)60135-6 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.04.00910.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.04.009 ↗
35. 10.1180/mgm.2020.7810.1180/mgm.2020.78 ↗
36. Phase Equilibrium Study of the System NaAlSiO4 (nepheline)—LiAlSiO4 (eucryptite) at Different Temperatures under Atmospheric Pressure
37. 10.1007/BF0122626210.1007/BF01226262 ↗
38. 10.1093/petrology/egaa04810.1093/petrology/egaa048 ↗
39. 10.2138/am.2007.238010.2138/am.2007.2380 ↗
40. 10.1127/ejm/2019/0031‐278810.1127/ejm/2019/0031‐2788 ↗
41. ioGAS. 8.2 IMDEX Limited2024.
42. 10.1016/j.hydromet.2015.06.00310.1016/j.hydromet.2015.06.003 ↗
43. 10.1130/G30601.110.1130/G30601.1 ↗
44. Fuerstenau M. C. · 2009
45. Underwood E. E. · 1970
46. 10.3390/min708013410.3390/min7080134 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.02.06510.1016/j.jmrt.2021.02.065 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.09.01310.1016/j.cemconres.2017.09.013 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.12.00110.1016/j.cemconres.2010.12.001 ↗
50. 10.1080/25726641.2018.148379310.1080/25726641.2018.1483793 ↗
51. 10.1007/s12613‐019‐1822‐910.1007/s12613‐019‐1822‐9 ↗