journal article·2026-03Open access

Dual‐Anchored Clickable Peptide via SPAAC for Gelatinase‐Responsive Antibacterial and Osteogenic Functions on Titanium Implants

Ru Zhong, Hang Zhou, Chenyang Ye, Lei Chu, Lin Wang, Yingjun Wang

Advanced Science· Volume 13· Issue 14

Abstract

ABSTRACT Antibacterial orthopedic implants that simultaneously promote osteointegration remain an unmet clinical challenge. Conventional enzyme‐responsive antibacterial surfaces often suffer from irreversible loss of osteogenic motifs upon activation, limiting their regenerative capacity post‐infection. Herein, we report a dual‐anchored peptide design engineered on titanium implants (Ti‐Dual) that addresses this limitation by retaining biofunctional motifs after pathogen‐triggered activation. The peptide construct integrates an antimicrobial sequence (HHC36) and a cell‐adhesive RGD motif connected via a gelatinase‐cleavable spacer (GPLGV). Terminal azide groups enable stable dual‐point grafting through SPAAC chemistry, overcoming the low grafting efficiency associated with mixed RGD grafting systems. Under physiological conditions, the constrained conformation suppresses antibacterial activity, favoring osteogenesis. Upon infection, bacterial gelatinase cleaves the linker, activating rapid and potent antibacterial effects—eliminating 99.37% of P. aeruginosa within 10 min, and 99.73% of S. aureus and 99.99% of P. aeruginosa within 120 min—while the RGD motif remains anchored, ensuring continuous cell adhesion and tissue integration. In vivo, Ti‐Dual effectively eradicated multidrug‐resistant P. aeruginosa , suppressed inflammatory responses, mitigated bone resorption, and enhanced osteogenesis in a rat femoral infection model. This design resolves the critical trade‐off between infection responsiveness and sustained pro‐regenerative function, offering a robust and adaptive strategy for infected bone defect repair.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials · Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction South China University of Technology Guangzhou China

School of Material Science and Engineering South China University of Technology Guangzhou China

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering South China University of Technology Guangzhou China

Department of Orthopaedics The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Key Research and Development Program of China

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.00410.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41572‐022‐00396‐010.1038/s41572‐022‐00396‐0 ↗
3. 10.1021/10.1002/wnan.127310.1021/10.1002/wnan.1273 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0562010.1021/acsnano.7b05620 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.07410.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.074 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.01.01210.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.01.012 ↗
7. 10.1002/adhm.20230451010.1002/adhm.202304510 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsnano.4c0447810.1021/acsnano.4c04478 ↗
9. 10.1002/adfm.20201116510.1002/adfm.202011165 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.12870710.1016/j.cej.2021.128707 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20250611310.1002/adma.202506113 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.06310.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.063 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.12246510.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122465 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.07.00210.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.07.002 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41467‐021‐23954‐810.1038/s41467‐021‐23954‐8 ↗
16. 10.1002/advs.20190059910.1002/advs.201900599 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsnano.4c0888310.1021/acsnano.4c08883 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12578310.1016/j.cej.2020.125783 ↗
19. 10.1002/adma.20150343710.1002/adma.201503437 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.10195810.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101958 ↗
21. 10.1002/adfm.20240786910.1002/adfm.202407869 ↗
22. 10.1002/adfm.20180791510.1002/adfm.201807915 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jmst.2024.02.05410.1016/j.jmst.2024.02.054 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15337010.1016/j.cej.2024.153370 ↗
25. 10.1002/anie.20170607110.1002/anie.201706071 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20150065810.1002/adma.201500658 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.12038610.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120386 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.2c0261410.1021/acsami.2c02614 ↗
29. 10.3390/antibiotics1209135410.3390/antibiotics12091354 ↗
30. 10.1111/j.1365‐2249.2005.02840.x10.1111/j.1365‐2249.2005.02840.x ↗
31. 10.1021/nn501040h10.1021/nn501040h ↗
32. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0576610.1021/acsnano.9b05766 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.09.01410.1016/j.jconrel.2020.09.014 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.04410.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.044 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.12364210.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123642 ↗
36. 10.1002/adma.20170346110.1002/adma.201703461 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jot.2024.10.00210.1016/j.jot.2024.10.002 ↗
38. 10.1042/bj308016710.1042/bj3080167 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.12895510.1016/j.cej.2021.128955 ↗
40. EUCAST Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters Version 15.0 https://www.eucast.org(accessed: December 2025).
41. 10.1002/adfm.20221516610.1002/adfm.202215166 ↗
42. 10.1038/s41467‐019‐14000‐910.1038/s41467‐019‐14000‐9 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.injury.2016.09.01910.1016/j.injury.2016.09.019 ↗
44. 10.1186/s13578‐021‐00554‐z10.1186/s13578‐021‐00554‐z ↗
45. 10.1177/1937334125136427110.1177/19373341251364271 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.05.00710.1016/j.immuni.2010.05.007 ↗
47. 10.1172/jci1919010.1172/jci19190 ↗
48. 10.1359/jbmr.06110310.1359/jbmr.061103 ↗
49. 10.1038/s44259‐024‐00046‐310.1038/s44259‐024‐00046‐3 ↗
50. 10.1038/nrd100810.1038/nrd1008 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2025.11500510.1016/j.colsurfb.2025.115005 ↗