journal article·2026-03Open access

Ligand‐Induced Electronic Response Enables Predictive QM/MM Simulations

Nichika Ozawa, Nahoko Kuroki, Hirotoshi Mori

Advanced Science· Volume 13· Issue 17

Abstract

ABSTRACT Predictive modeling of large molecular systems demands methods that combine quantum accuracy with scalability. Although hybrid quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) simulations offer such a framework, their predictive power has been limited by the subjective and system‐specific definition of the QM region. Here, we present an electronically informed protocol that objectively defines QM regions from ligand‐induced orbital shifts and charge‐redistribution, extracted in a single semiempirical fragment molecular orbital (FMO) calculation. Validated on both zeolite–guest and enzyme–inhibitor complexes, the method achieves chemical accuracy (within ∼1–2 kcal/mol on binding energies) while substantially reducing computational cost at the DFTB level. This cross‐domain strategy reframes QM/MM as a transferable design principle, bridging solid‐state catalysis and quantum biochemistry, and thereby providing a practical platform for predictive molecular engineering across diverse disciplines.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Metal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Applied Chemistry Faculty of Science and Engineering Chuo University Bunkyo‐ku Tokyo Japan

Faculty of Core Research Natural Science Division Ochanomizu University Bunkyo‐ku Tokyo Japan

Funding

National Institutes of Natural Sciences

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/advs.20240082910.1002/advs.202400829 ↗
2. 10.1002/jcc.2450210.1002/jcc.24502 ↗
3. 10.1038/s42256‐022‐00506‐310.1038/s42256‐022‐00506‐3 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0145610.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01456 ↗
5. 10.1002/advs.20190044710.1002/advs.201900447 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41467‐021‐23306‐610.1038/s41467‐021‐23306‐6 ↗
7. 10.1039/C9CP04353E10.1039/C9CP04353E ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c0024710.1021/acs.jcim.4c00247 ↗
9. 10.1016/0022‐2836(76)90311‐910.1016/0022‐2836(76)90311‐9 ↗
10. 10.1002/anie.20080201910.1002/anie.200802019 ↗
11. 10.1039/D2CP04537K10.1039/D2CP04537K ↗
12. 10.1007/s11030‐021‐10259‐710.1007/s11030‐021‐10259‐7 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c0039410.1021/acs.jcim.1c00394 ↗
14. 10.3389/fmolb.2022.89980510.3389/fmolb.2022.899805 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c0185410.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01854 ↗
16. 10.1039/d1cp02535j10.1039/d1cp02535j ↗
17. 10.1021/jacs.2c0982310.1021/jacs.2c09823 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c0015310.1021/acs.jctc.0c00153 ↗
19. 10.1039/C8CP03871F10.1039/C8CP03871F ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c0152210.1021/acs.jcim.2c01522 ↗
21. 10.1002/jcc.2340310.1002/jcc.23403 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b0781410.1021/acs.jpcb.6b07814 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b0104910.1021/acs.jctc.6b01049 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0009‐2614(99)00874‐X10.1016/S0009‐2614(99)00874‐X ↗
25. 10.1002/wcms.132210.1002/wcms.1322 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.512621610.1063/1.5126216 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41598‐022‐24049‐010.1038/s41598‐022‐24049‐0 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b0744610.1021/acs.jpcb.8b07446 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.comptc.2012.02.00810.1016/j.comptc.2012.02.008 ↗
30. 10.1021/ct100684s10.1021/ct100684s ↗
31. 10.1021/ct500489d10.1021/ct500489d ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c0156710.1021/acs.jpcc.3c01567 ↗
33. 10.1002/cmdc.20110035310.1002/cmdc.201100353 ↗
34. 10.1063/5.004492710.1063/5.0044927 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b1200010.1021/acs.jpca.7b12000 ↗
36. 10.1002/anie.20100678110.1002/anie.201006781 ↗
37. 10.1002/jcc.54014111210.1002/jcc.540141112 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b0052910.1021/acs.jctc.8b00529 ↗
39. C.Baerlocher D.Brouwer B.Marler andL. B.McCusker “Database of Zeolite Structures ” accessed September 272025 https://www.iza‐structure.org/databases/.
40. 10.1016/S0166‐1280(09)80008‐010.1016/S0166‐1280(09)80008‐0 ↗
41. J.Frenzel A. F.Oliveira N.Jardillier T.Heine andG.Seifert “Semi‐Relativistic Self‐Consistent Charge Slater–Koster Tables for Density‐Functional Based Tight‐Binding (DFTB) for Materials Science Simulations ”https://github.com/dftbparams/matsci/releases.
42. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0053310.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00533 ↗
43. Chemical Computing Group ULC · 2022
44. 10.1002/jcc.2003510.1002/jcc.20035 ↗
45. 10.1002/1096-987X(200009)21:12<1049::AID-JCC3>3.0.CO;2-F10.1002/1096-987X(200009)21:12<1049::AID-JCC3>3.0.CO;2-F ↗
46. 10.1002/jcc.2581610.1002/jcc.25816 ↗
47. 10.1002/jcc.2040610.1002/jcc.20406 ↗
48. 10.1021/jp961992r10.1021/jp961992r ↗