A Versatile Three Dimensional Traction Force Microscopy Framework for Uncovering the Mechanics of Bio‐Adhesion
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study presents a novel, versatile traction force microscopy framework for quantifying three‐dimensional (3D) interfacial forces during bio‐adhesion by integrating in situ stereo‐digital image correlation with finite element (FE) simulation. The method enables accurate measurement of microscale displacements and force distributions at the interfaces in both dry and wet environments, addressing limitations of conventional microscopy techniques related to limited measurement scales, restricted fields of view, and surface disturbance from contact or fluorescence. An analytical model was developed to guide the design of a deformable substrate, supporting selection of subtrate material and thickness of the substrate. System accuracy was examined through steel ball compression experiments, which were validated against FE simulations. The framework was applied to marine mussel plaque adhesion under 15° directional tension to characterize interfacial traction force distributions. Sensitivity analyses examined the effects of Poisson's ratio, Young's modulus, and constitutive models on the results. This approach offers a versatile platform for investigating interfacial mechanics in adhesives, with broad relevance to bioengineering applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Engineering and Materials Science Queen Mary University of London London E1 4NS UK
School of Mechanics and Transportation Engineering Northwestern Polytechnical University Xi'an 710129 P. R. China
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Leverhulme Trust
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s40544-018-0203-010.1007/s40544-018-0203-0 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.10584710.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.105847 ↗
3. 10.1016/0142-9612(94)90025-610.1016/0142-9612(94)90025-6 ↗
4. 10.1002/sca.2017310.1002/sca.20173 ↗
5. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-083012-13032410.1146/annurev-biophys-083012-130324 ↗
6. 10.1038/nmeth81710.1038/nmeth817 ↗
7. 10.1088/2050-6120/ab736510.1088/2050-6120/ab7365 ↗
8. 10.1016/B978-0-12-407761-4.00023-310.1016/B978-0-12-407761-4.00023-3 ↗
9. 10.5487/TR.2015.31.2.09710.5487/TR.2015.31.2.097 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.micron.2021.10313810.1016/j.micron.2021.103138 ↗
11. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100363110.1371/journal.pcbi.1003631 ↗
12. 10.1016/B978-0-12-420138-5.00020-310.1016/B978-0-12-420138-5.00020-3 ↗
13. 10.1038/ncomms1281410.1038/ncomms12814 ↗
14. 10.1529/biophysj.107.11367010.1529/biophysj.107.113670 ↗
15. 10.1152/ajpcell.00270.200110.1152/ajpcell.00270.2001 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77386-810.1016/S0006-3495(99)77386-8 ↗
17. 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-103122-03113010.1146/annurev-bioeng-103122-031130 ↗
18. 10.1038/nmeth.153110.1038/nmeth.1531 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.03410.1016/j.cell.2012.11.034 ↗
20. 10.1038/srep4163310.1038/srep41633 ↗
21. 10.1038/ncb313410.1038/ncb3134 ↗
22. 10.1038/s42003-024-05788-410.1038/s42003-024-05788-4 ↗
23. 10.1152/ajpcell.00270.200110.1152/ajpcell.00270.2001 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41467-021-22376-w10.1038/s41467-021-22376-w ↗
25. 10.1038/3507453210.1038/35074532 ↗
26. 10.1038/ncomms1281410.1038/ncomms12814 ↗
27. Li Y. · Sci. Adv. · 2022 · 8 · 1
28. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.11.02510.1016/j.msea.2010.11.025 ↗
29. 10.24243/JMEB/4.1.16310.24243/JMEB/4.1.163 ↗
30. 10.3390/jfb1301000210.3390/jfb13010002 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.479168910.1063/1.4791689 ↗
32. Reu P. · Exp Tech · 2014 · 38 · 1
33. 10.1364/OE.27.02243910.1364/OE.27.022439 ↗
34. Turner D. Z. · Sandia report, Sand2015‐10606 O · 2015
35. 10.1007/978-0-387-78747-310.1007/978-0-387-78747-3 ↗
36. 10.1007/s11340-017-0259-110.1007/s11340-017-0259-1 ↗
37. Ogden R. W. · Proc. Royal So. London. A. Math. Phys. Sci. · 1972 · 326 · 565
38. ASTM D412 · 2009
39. ASTM D882 · 2021
40. 10.1039/c3sm50901j10.1039/c3sm50901j ↗
41. 10.1039/C8SM02105H10.1039/C8SM02105H ↗
42. 10.1016/j.optmat.2018.08.05110.1016/j.optmat.2018.08.051 ↗
43. 10.1039/C7SM02062G10.1039/C7SM02062G ↗
44. Timoshenko S. P. · 2012
45. 10.1117/1.JBO.25.12.12370310.1117/1.JBO.25.12.123703 ↗
46. 10.1007/s11340-017-0354-310.1007/s11340-017-0354-3 ↗
47. Pang Y. · Proc. Royal Soc. A: Math., Phys. Eng. Sci. · 2024 · 48010.1098/rspa.2023.0465 ↗
48. 10.1088/0960-1317/23/9/09502410.1088/0960-1317/23/9/095024 ↗
49. 10.3390/polym1323425810.3390/polym13234258 ↗
50. 10.3390/ma1509326210.3390/ma15093262 ↗
51. Y.Pang Y.Hou T.Liu The mechanical responses of marine mussel plaques attached to wet substrates subject to angled tensions In preparation.
52. 10.1115/1.403904110.1115/1.4039041 ↗
53. 10.1007/s11043-010-9121-x10.1007/s11043-010-9121-x ↗
54. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.04410.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.044 ↗
55. 10.1088/1361-6501/aac55b10.1088/1361-6501/aac55b ↗
56. Bigger R. · International Digital Image Correlation Society · 2018 · 94
57. 10.4319/lo.2002.47.6.172310.4319/lo.2002.47.6.1723 ↗