Quantitative Assessment of Randomized DNA Base Sequences Using Multi‐Model Physical Analysis for High‐Fidelity Data Storage
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract DNA is emerging as a promising medium for ultra‐dense, long‐term digital data storage, yet sequence design remains hindered by homopolymer formation and compositional bias, which compromise synthesis, sequencing, and decoding accuracy. Here, the study introduces a quantitative framework to evaluate and optimize randomized DNA base sequence design rules using three physics‐inspired models: translational and rotational active particle trajectories, the inverse Ising model, and a 3‐input 1‐output logic algorithm system. Encoding schemes with varying homopolymer constraints are systematically applied to binary image data. Rigorous analysis reveals that stringent randomization rules markedly reduce homopolymer length, balance GC content, and enhance sequence randomness. Experimental validation via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and Sanger sequencing confirms high decoding fidelity (95–98%). This multi‐model assessment establishes a robust strategy for designing DNA sequences with superior stability, reliability, and scalability for future molecular data storage systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: DNA and Biological Computing · DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics Institute of Basic Science and Sungkyunkwan Advanced Institute of Nanotechnology (SAINT) Sungkyunkwan University Suwon 16419 Republic of Korea
Faculty of Science Yamagata University Yamagata 990‐8560 Japan
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmeth.291810.1038/nmeth.2918 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.02.01610.1016/j.csbj.2023.02.016 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41540‐022‐00233‐w10.1038/s41540‐022‐00233‐w ↗
4. 10.1038/s41467‐021‐21587‐510.1038/s41467‐021‐21587‐5 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41598‐019‐43105‐w10.1038/s41598‐019‐43105‐w ↗
6. 10.1038/s41467‐021‐27846‐910.1038/s41467‐021‐27846‐9 ↗
7. 10.1038/nature1187510.1038/nature11875 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41570‐018‐0051‐510.1038/s41570‐018‐0051‐5 ↗
9. 10.1002/smtd.20210133510.1002/smtd.202101335 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41467‐023‐36297‐310.1038/s41467‐023‐36297‐3 ↗
11. 10.1038/s43588‐022‐00231‐210.1038/s43588‐022‐00231‐2 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41596‐019‐0244‐510.1038/s41596‐019‐0244‐5 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41467-019-10978-410.1038/s41467-019-10978-4 ↗
14. 10.1038/srep1413810.1038/srep14138 ↗
15. 10.1093/bib/bbae36310.1093/bib/bbae363 ↗
16. 10.1186/s12864‐024‐10178‐510.1186/s12864‐024‐10178‐5 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41598‐024‐58386‐z10.1038/s41598‐024‐58386‐z ↗
18. 10.1038/s43588‐025‐00793‐x10.1038/s43588‐025‐00793‐x ↗
19. 10.1038/s41467‐025‐64230‐310.1038/s41467‐025‐64230‐3 ↗
20. 10.1021/la301370y10.1021/la301370y ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.04810210.1103/PhysRevLett.99.048102 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevE.82.01530410.1103/PhysRevE.82.015304 ↗
23. 10.1080/00018732.2017.134160410.1080/00018732.2017.1341604 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.05060210.1103/PhysRevLett.109.050602 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.09020110.1103/PhysRevLett.108.090201 ↗
26. Strečka J. · Acta Phys. Slovaca · 2015 · 65 · 235
27. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0138710.1021/acsnano.0c01387 ↗
28. 10.1039/D1NR05055A10.1039/D1NR05055A ↗
29. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0006810.1021/acsnano.8b00068 ↗
30. 10.1088/1361‐6528/ab547210.1088/1361‐6528/ab5472 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0095010.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00950 ↗
32. 10.1039/C5NR03088A10.1039/C5NR03088A ↗