The Role of Operating Temperature on Pore‐Scale Gas Transport in Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Electrolyzers
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this study, the effects of operating temperature on pore‐scale gas bubble transport in a carbon‐based anode porous transport layer (PTL) of a polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) electrolyzer is revealed using operando X‐ray computed tomography (CT). Higher temperature operation (80 °C compared to 40 °C) led to a lower total gas bubble volume fraction in the PTL (0.25 to 0.17; 32% lower), which is attributed to improved water transport and gas removal. Higher temperatures led to fewer bubbles in the PTL (13% less at 80 °C compared to 40 °C) as well as a greater occurrence of smaller bubbles (35% increase in skewness of the bubble size distribution), and this behavior is attributed to faster rates of nucleation and bubble detachment from the electrode. The formation of gas slugs is also observed in the anode channels at 60 °C and 80 °C, which is attributed to the faster detachment and coalescence of bubbles from the PTL/flow field interface.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Bazylak Group Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering University of Toronto 5 King's College Road Toronto ON M5S 3G8 Canada
Canadian Light Source 44 Innovation Boulevard Saskatoon SK S7N 2V3 Canada
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · National Research Council · Canadian Institutes of Health Research
References (75)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1140/epjp/i2016-16053-310.1140/epjp/i2016-16053-3 ↗
2. Carmo M. · 2018 · 165
3. 10.1029/2018EF00111710.1029/2018EF001117 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.12.18010.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.12.180 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.energy.2020.11898710.1016/j.energy.2020.118987 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.02210.1016/j.rser.2019.02.022 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.est.2024.11135410.1016/j.est.2024.111354 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.est.2021.10267610.1016/j.est.2021.102676 ↗
9. Verfondern K. · 2022 · 1
10. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.16310.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.163 ↗
11. 10.1016/B978-0-12-824510-1.00015-510.1016/B978-0-12-824510-1.00015-5 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.solener.2004.09.00310.1016/j.solener.2004.09.003 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e0650610.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06506 ↗
14. 10.1149/2.1441704jes10.1149/2.1441704jes ↗
15. 10.1016/j.coche.2021.10071910.1016/j.coche.2021.100719 ↗
16. Department of Energy. Department of Energy Hydrogen Program Plan 2020.
17. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.07.00310.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.07.003 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.05.00610.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.05.006 ↗
19. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab8c8910.1149/1945-7111/ab8c89 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.02.08710.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.02.087 ↗
21. 10.1149/2.0521904jes10.1149/2.0521904jes ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.15310.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.153 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.06.10310.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.06.103 ↗
24. 10.1149/2.13517109jes10.1149/2.13517109jes ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23174210.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231742 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.01.02610.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.01.026 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.elecom.2015.03.00910.1016/j.elecom.2015.03.009 ↗
28. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab68c810.1149/1945-7111/ab68c8 ↗
29. 10.1149/2.0091611jes10.1149/2.0091611jes ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.18310.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.183 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.22691010.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.226910 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.11410.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.114 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.05402910.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.054029 ↗
34. 10.1149/2.0641607jes10.1149/2.0641607jes ↗
35. 10.1002/aenm.20210063010.1002/aenm.202100630 ↗
36. 10.1002/admt.20230028110.1002/admt.202300281 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.11279710.1016/j.enconman.2020.112797 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.22731210.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227312 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c0087310.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00873 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.22949210.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229492 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsami.0c2235810.1021/acsami.0c22358 ↗
42. 10.1039/C9SE00364A10.1039/C9SE00364A ↗
43. 10.1149/MA2017-02/32/142910.1149/MA2017-02/32/1429 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.09210.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.092 ↗
45. 10.1149/2.0461613jes10.1149/2.0461613jes ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.05810.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.058 ↗
47. 10.1088/2515-7655/abb78310.1088/2515-7655/abb783 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.00110.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.001 ↗
49. 10.1039/D3YA00189J10.1039/D3YA00189J ↗
50. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab7a0b10.1149/1945-7111/ab7a0b ↗
51. 10.1016/j.isci.2020.10178310.1016/j.isci.2020.101783 ↗
52. 10.1039/D1TA03379D10.1039/D1TA03379D ↗
53. 10.1021/acsami.3c0689910.1021/acsami.3c06899 ↗
54. Adamson A. W. · Phys. Chem. Surf. · 1990 · 524 · A467
55. C. T.Ham Master Thesis University of Toronto2025.
56. 10.1103/PhysRevE.96.02330710.1103/PhysRevE.96.023307 ↗
57. 10.1021/jacs.7b1345710.1021/jacs.7b13457 ↗
58. 10.1149/2.1031810jes10.1149/2.1031810jes ↗
59. 10.1016/j.pecs.2023.10107510.1016/j.pecs.2023.101075 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.25310.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.253 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.06910.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.069 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.08.18010.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.08.180 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12118410.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121184 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.08.22310.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.08.223 ↗
65. 10.1149/1.213004410.1149/1.2130044 ↗
66. 10.1107/S160057752400524110.1107/S1600577524005241 ↗
67. 10.1107/S160057752200282X10.1107/S160057752200282X ↗
68. 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01010.x10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01010.x ↗
69. 10.1364/OE.11.00228910.1364/OE.11.002289 ↗
70. 10.1038/nmeth.201910.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
71. Comet Technologies Canada Inc. Dragonfly Montreal Canada2022.
72. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.14410.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.144 ↗
73. 10.1109/MCSE.2016.4910.1109/MCSE.2016.49 ↗
74. Dodge Y. · 2008 · 283
75. Joanes D. N. · J. R. Stat. Soc. · 1998 · 47 · 183