journal article·2025-08Open access

Accounting for ALA Natural Mutations Enhances the Efficiency of Graphene Oxide Nanopriming in Bar ‐Modified Arabidopsis

Yining Wu, Rui Sun, Yueting Cui, Jun Qiao, Chengdong Zhang

Advanced Science· Volume 12· Issue 32

Abstract

Abstract Environmental stress poses significant challenges to global agriculture, highlighting the need for resilient crops with optimized stress responses. Nanopriming and genetic modification technologies offer promising solutions. However, the differential effects of nanopriming on genetically modified (GM) and wild‐type (WT) plants remain unexplored. Using natural α‐linolenic acid (ALA) metabolism mutations as a reference, genetic variation influences resilience under graphene oxide (GO) priming is examined in Arabidopsis thaliana . GO priming increased chlorophyll content by 91.6% in WT plants and 29.6% in GM ( bar ‐gene) plants. Photosynthetic efficiency and quantum yield improved in the WT plants but declined in the GM plants. ALA metabolism mutations exacerbate lipid metabolism disruptions in GM plants, including altered jasmonic acid signaling and lipid composition, which compromise chloroplast integrity. Notably, transgenerational effects are observed in GM plants, with F1 seeds demonstrating dynamic epigenetic regulation of ALA metabolic genes, underscoring the influence of priming on stress resilience across generations. ALA supplementation enhanced the photosynthetic performance and chlorophyll content in WT and GM plants, with the GM plants exhibiting a significant increase of ≈60%. These findings emphasize the need for tailored nanopriming strategies that consider genetic variation and metabolic trade‐offs, thereby advancing the development of resilient crops for sustainable agriculture.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms · Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis · Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Environment Beijing Normal University 19 Xinjiekouwai Street, Haidian District Beijing 100875 China

Engineering Research Center of Coal‐Based Ecological Carbon Sequestration Technology of the Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Graphene Forestry Application of National Forest and Grass Administration Shanxi Datong University Xingyun Street, Datong City Shanxi 037009 China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1073/pnas.180044211510.1073/pnas.1800442115 ↗
2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) FAO report: Agrifood sector faces growing threat from climate change‐induced loss and damage https://www.fao.org/newsroom/detail/fao‐report‐agrifood‐sector‐faces‐growing‐threat‐from‐climate‐change‐induced‐loss‐and‐damage/en(accessed: December 2024).
3. 10.1126/sciadv.140003910.1126/sciadv.1400039 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41477-019-0430-z10.1038/s41477-019-0430-z ↗
5. 10.1038/s41565-022-01082-810.1038/s41565-022-01082-8 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41565-019-0439-510.1038/s41565-019-0439-5 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.stress.2022.10009110.1016/j.stress.2022.100091 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.11.06010.1016/j.carbon.2021.11.060 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsnano.4c0055710.1021/acsnano.4c00557 ↗
10. 10.1002/advs.20241222310.1002/advs.202412223 ↗
11. AgbioInvestor Global GM Crop Area Review https://gm.agbioinvestor.com(accessed: December 2024).
12. 10.1038/s43705-023-00217-910.1038/s43705-023-00217-9 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41477-017-0061-110.1038/s41477-017-0061-1 ↗
14. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2008.00398.x10.1111/j.1467-7652.2008.00398.x ↗
15. 10.1016/j.nbt.2021.05.00510.1016/j.nbt.2021.05.005 ↗
16. 10.3389/fgeed.2022.93785310.3389/fgeed.2022.937853 ↗
17. 10.3389/fpls.2019.0023610.3389/fpls.2019.00236 ↗
18. 10.1105/tpc.18.0034710.1105/tpc.18.00347 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.11.02810.1016/j.biortech.2018.11.028 ↗
20. 10.1039/D2NP00005A10.1039/D2NP00005A ↗
21. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.11.02110.1016/j.plaphy.2017.11.021 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jplph.2023.15409210.1016/j.jplph.2023.154092 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.est.7b0192210.1021/acs.est.7b01922 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.est.0c0204010.1021/acs.est.0c02040 ↗
25. 10.1038/nprot.2006.9710.1038/nprot.2006.97 ↗
26. 10.1007/BF0002711810.1007/BF00027118 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.plipres.2019.10099010.1016/j.plipres.2019.100990 ↗
28. 10.1111/tpj.1691010.1111/tpj.16910 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2018.03.02010.1016/j.jnutbio.2018.03.020 ↗
30. Karki N. · Plant Cell · 2019 · 31 · 2768
31. 10.1007/s00018-015-2089-610.1007/s00018-015-2089-6 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.11234810.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112348 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.plipres.2020.10106910.1016/j.plipres.2020.101069 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.04.00310.1016/j.tplants.2007.04.003 ↗
35. 10.1093/jxb/erab20010.1093/jxb/erab200 ↗
36. 10.1039/D0FO01040E10.1039/D0FO01040E ↗
37. 10.1126/science.aav446710.1126/science.aav4467 ↗
38. 10.1126/sciadv.abq735210.1126/sciadv.abq7352 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.13715610.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137156 ↗
40. 10.3389/fpls.2017.0189610.3389/fpls.2017.01896 ↗
41. 10.3389/fpls.2015.0012210.3389/fpls.2015.00122 ↗
42. 10.1038/s41580-018-0016-z10.1038/s41580-018-0016-z ↗
43. Singh R. K. · Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. · 2021 · 42 · 548
44. 10.1105/tpc.114.13037710.1105/tpc.114.130377 ↗
45. 10.1093/plcell/koad05910.1093/plcell/koad059 ↗
46. 10.1093/jxb/erab31810.1093/jxb/erab318 ↗
47. Krawczyk H. E. · Plant Physiol. · 2022 · 189 · 490
48. 10.1093/plcell/koab27010.1093/plcell/koab270 ↗
49. 10.1093/pcp/pcq18210.1093/pcp/pcq182 ↗
50. 10.3390/plants1117219310.3390/plants11172193 ↗
51. 10.1038/s41477-022-01254-310.1038/s41477-022-01254-3 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.13316310.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.133163 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jplph.2018.06.00710.1016/j.jplph.2018.06.007 ↗
54. 10.1104/pp.124.2.61510.1104/pp.124.2.615 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.12.03610.1016/j.carbon.2016.12.036 ↗
56. 10.1186/s13007-020-00606-410.1186/s13007-020-00606-4 ↗