A Live Cell Imaging‐Compatible Bioreactor for the Interrogation of Cellular Responses to Modulated Flow Conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Although being invaluable tools in biomedical research, traditional 2D cell culture models often fail in recapitulating complex environments, limiting their predictive power. To address this limitation, it have developed an open‐source, low‐cost system that combines long‐term 3D cell culture under controlled perfusion conditions with live‐cell imaging. By integrating bioprinted extracellular matrix‐based scaffolds, this study mimics mechanical and biochemical cues experienced by cells within complex tissue contexts. Here, this system is used to generate a model of the cerebrospinal fluid‐filled subarachnoid space to study responses of resident cell types such as meningothelial cells to altered fluid flow conditions. Using fluorescent biosensors, it demonstrates that meningothelial cells respond to modulated fluid flow by differentially activating focal adhesion kinase, a key mechanosensor. The model thus not only provides a powerful platform for investigating the impact of mechanical and other cues on cellular responses, but also bears great potential for the generation of impactful cell biological and pathophysiological models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus · Micro and Nano Robotics · Protist diversity and phylogeny
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedicine University Hospital Basel & University Basel Basel Switzerland
Institute of Pathology University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland
The Francis Crick Institute 1 Midland Road London NW1 1AT UK
Funding
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1073/pnas.221574712010.1073/pnas.2215747120 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41413-022-00219-810.1038/s41413-022-00219-8 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e3349910.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33499 ↗
4. 10.1083/jcb.20100113810.1083/jcb.201001138 ↗
5. 10.1038/ni.342310.1038/ni.3423 ↗
6. 10.1186/s12950-023-00374-710.1186/s12950-023-00374-7 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.09.00210.1016/j.neuron.2023.09.002 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.bbi.2021.01.02810.1016/j.bbi.2021.01.028 ↗
9. 10.1177/107385842095482610.1177/1073858420954826 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.neuron.2024.09.01710.1016/j.neuron.2024.09.017 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.11232210.1016/j.yexcr.2020.112322 ↗
12. 10.1186/s12987-023-00423-610.1186/s12987-023-00423-6 ↗
13. 10.1186/1742-2094-11-3510.1186/1742-2094-11-35 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2011.12.02710.1016/j.jneuroim.2011.12.027 ↗
15. 10.1111/boc.20130001310.1111/boc.201300013 ↗
16. 10.1152/ajpcell.00343.202410.1152/ajpcell.00343.2024 ↗
17. 10.1177/0271678X2098238810.1177/0271678X20982388 ↗
18. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep1261374810.1111/1523-1747.ep12613748 ↗
19. Levick J. R. · 2010
20. 10.1038/labinvest.370030710.1038/labinvest.3700307 ↗
21. 10.1186/s12987-021-00253-410.1186/s12987-021-00253-4 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.11010210.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110102 ↗
23. 10.1016/bs.pbr.2020.06.00410.1016/bs.pbr.2020.06.004 ↗
24. 10.1093/braincomms/fcac24010.1093/braincomms/fcac240 ↗
25. 10.1002/ppul.2736010.1002/ppul.27360 ↗
26. 10.1152/physrev.00018.202410.1152/physrev.00018.2024 ↗
27. 10.1073/pnas.130740511010.1073/pnas.1307405110 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41587-019-0193-010.1038/s41587-019-0193-0 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41586-024-08021-810.1038/s41586-024-08021-8 ↗
30. 10.3390/bioengineering1001004710.3390/bioengineering10010047 ↗
31. Bradski G. · Dobb's Journal of Software Tools · 2000 · 25 · 122