Physical One‐Way Functions for Decentralized Consensus Via Proof of Physical Work
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Decentralized consensus on the state of the Bitcoin blockchain is ensured by proof of work. It relies on digital one‐way functions and is associated with an enormous environmental impact. This paper conceptualizes a physical one‐way function that aims to transform a digital, electricity‐consuming consensus mechanism into a physical process. Boundary conditions for the security requirements are established and discussed as well as experimentally investigated for a specific setup based on printing and optical analysis of pigment‐carrier composites. In the context of the applied methods, this setup promises to be mathematically unclonable, steady, reproducible, collision resistant and non‐invertible and illustrates the feasibility of a physical one‐way function. Based on this, a framework for proof of physical work is conceptualized, which has the potential of a drastically lower CO2 footprint. This work initiates a progressive, interdisciplinary field of research and demands further investigations with regards to alternative setups, security definitions and strategies for challenging them.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Mechanical Process Engineering and Mechanics (MVM) KIT Strasse am Forum 8 76131 Karlsruhe Germany
Material Research Center for Energy Systems (MZE) KIT Strasse am Forum 7 76131 Karlsruhe Germany
Light Technology Institute (LTI) KIT Engesserstrasse 13 76131 Karlsruhe Germany
BASF SE Carl‐Bosch‐Strasse 38 67056 Ludwigshafen/Rhein Germany
Institute of Information Security and Dependability (KASTEL) KIT Am Fasanengarten 5 76131 Karlsruhe Germany
Funding
BASF
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Secure hash standard (SHS) (FIPS 180‐4) Standard National Institute of Standards and Technology 2015.
2. S.Nakamoto Bitcoin: A peer‐to‐peer electronic cash system https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf(accessed: October 2024).
3. 10.1016/j.erss.2019.10127310.1016/j.erss.2019.101273 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.joule.2022.02.00510.1016/j.joule.2022.02.005 ↗
5. 10.1017/CBO978113917086410.1017/CBO9781139170864 ↗
6. Bohren C. F. · 2004
7. Information security cybersecurity and privacy protection ‐ physically unclonable functions ‐ part 1: Security requirements Standard ISO/IEC 2020.
8. P. H.Nguyen D. P.Sahoo C.Jin K.Mahmood U.Rührmair M.vanDijk Cryptology ePrint Archive IACR Online2018.
9. 10.1038/s41570-017-003110.1038/s41570-017-0031 ↗
10. 10.1038/s42005-019-0139-310.1038/s42005-019-0139-3 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.107437610.1126/science.1074376 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41598-022-11234-410.1038/s41598-022-11234-4 ↗
13. 10.1007/978-3-540-29900-410.1007/978-3-540-29900-4 ↗
14. 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010814-01464410.1146/annurev-fluid-010814-014644 ↗
15. 10.14356/kona.202200510.14356/kona.2022005 ↗
16. Rührmair U. · 2014 · 1
17. N.Wisiol C.Mühl N.Pirnay P. H.Nguyen M.Margraf J.‐P.Seifert M.vanDijk U.Rührmair IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems IACR Online2020 97.10.46586/tches.v2020.i3.97-120 ↗
18. 10.1007/1-84628-224-1_1610.1007/1-84628-224-1_16 ↗
19. 10.1080/00031305.2016.127715910.1080/00031305.2016.1277159 ↗
20. 10.38094/jastt2016510.38094/jastt20165 ↗
21. 10.1023/A:102260712364910.1023/A:1022607123649 ↗
22. Pedregosa F. · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2011 · 12 · 2825
23. L.Seidemann H. K. P.Jelich WO 2023/094341 A1 International patent 2023.