Robotic Vectorial Field Alignment for Spin‐Based Quantum Sensors
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Developing practical quantum technologies will require the exquisite manipulation of fragile systems in a robust and repeatable way. As quantum technologies move toward real world applications, from biological sensing to communication in space, increasing experimental complexity introduces constraints that can be alleviated by the introduction of new technologies. Robotics has shown tremendous progress in realizing increasingly smart, autonomous, and highly dexterous machines. Here, a robotic arm equipped with a magnet is demonstrated to sensitize an NV center quantum magnetometer in challenging conditions unachievable with standard techniques. Vector magnetic fields are generated with 1° angular and 0.1 mT amplitude accuracy and determine the orientation of a single stochastically‐aligned spin‐based sensor in a constrained physical environment. This work opens up the prospect of integrating robotics across many quantum degrees of freedom in constrained settings, allowing for increased prototyping speed, control, and robustness in quantum technology applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Quantum Engineering Technology Labs and Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering University of Bristol Bristol BS8 1FD UK
Bristol Robotics Laboratory and Department of Engineering Mathematics University of Bristol Bristol BS8 1TW UK
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41566-018-0236-y10.1038/s41566-018-0236-y ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.18050210.1103/PhysRevLett.127.180502 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.19770210.1103/PhysRevLett.126.197702 ↗
4. 10.1038/nature0078410.1038/nature00784 ↗
5. 10.1140/epjqt/s40507-019-0072-010.1140/epjqt/s40507-019-0072-0 ↗
6. 10.1073/pnas.141932611210.1073/pnas.1419326112 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41567-020-0797-910.1038/s41567-020-0797-9 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41586-021-04076-z10.1038/s41586-021-04076-z ↗
9. 10.1038/s41586-022-04697-y10.1038/s41586-022-04697-y ↗
10. 10.1038/s41567-019-0420-010.1038/s41567-019-0420-0 ↗
11. 10.1002/qute.20210009510.1002/qute.202100095 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41467-022-35285-310.1038/s41467-022-35285-3 ↗
13. 10.1038/s42005-022-00844-z10.1038/s42005-022-00844-z ↗
14. J.Cline M.Vaughan W. J.Waltz I. M.Wong inAIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Reston VA2022 pp.0625.
15. 10.1038/s41586-018-0307-810.1038/s41586-018-0307-8 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41467-022-34167-y10.1038/s41467-022-34167-y ↗
17. 10.1103/RevModPhys.89.03500210.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002 ↗
18. 10.1088/0022-3719/21/23/02010.1088/0022-3719/21/23/020 ↗
19. 10.1088/0034-4885/77/5/05650310.1088/0034-4885/77/5/056503 ↗
20. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.8810.1038/natrevmats.2017.88 ↗
21. Ajoy A. · Phys. Rev. X · 2015 · 5
22. 10.1021/nl401523310.1021/nl4015233 ↗
23. 10.1126/science.aad802210.1126/science.aad8022 ↗
24. 10.1038/nnano.2011.6410.1038/nnano.2011.64 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c0302110.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03021 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b0022410.1021/acsphotonics.9b00224 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.24640210.1103/PhysRevLett.121.246402 ↗
28. 10.1038/nphys196910.1038/nphys1969 ↗
29. 10.1088/1367-2630/14/10/10303310.1088/1367-2630/14/10/103033 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.20120110.1103/PhysRevB.82.201201 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.09430310.1103/PhysRevB.78.094303 ↗
32. 10.1038/nnano.2012.25910.1038/nnano.2012.259 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.03404410.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.034044 ↗
34. 10.1063/5.000969810.1063/5.0009698 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.01405410.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.014054 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41534-020-0277-110.1038/s41534-020-0277-1 ↗
37. 10.1038/s41534-017-0033-310.1038/s41534-017-0033-3 ↗
38. 10.1002/qute.20200006610.1002/qute.202000066 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0472510.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04725 ↗
40. A.Stark Ph.D. Thesis Technical University of Denmark 2017.
41. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.08360210.1103/PhysRevLett.124.083602 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.04400410.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.044004 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.20540110.1103/PhysRevB.105.205401 ↗
44. 10.1038/s42254-023-00558-310.1038/s42254-023-00558-3 ↗
45. Jung T. · APL Photonics · 2019 · 4 · 12
46. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.16542810.1103/PhysRevB.100.165428 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.08760110.1103/PhysRevLett.112.087601 ↗
48. 10.1038/nmat414510.1038/nmat4145 ↗
49. 10.1109/LRA.2019.292998610.1109/LRA.2019.2929986 ↗
50. Quigley M. · ICRA Workshop Open Source Software · 2009 · 3 · 5
51. 10.1016/j.softx.2020.10046610.1016/j.softx.2020.100466 ↗
52. 10.1038/s41567-018-0269-710.1038/s41567-018-0269-7 ↗
53. 10.1038/nphys305010.1038/nphys3050 ↗
54. 10.1109/MRA.2012.220565110.1109/MRA.2012.2205651 ↗
55. Lima E. A. · 2006 · 13910.1002/9783527609956.ch10 ↗
56. 10.1063/1.351984710.1063/1.3519847 ↗
57. 10.1038/nature0727810.1038/nature07278 ↗
58. 10.1038/nature1207210.1038/nature12072 ↗
59. 10.1038/ncomms1470110.1038/ncomms14701 ↗
60. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.02339410.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023394 ↗
61. 10.1049/qtc2.1201510.1049/qtc2.12015 ↗
62. 10.1364/OE.39990210.1364/OE.399902 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.cpc.2012.02.02110.1016/j.cpc.2012.02.021 ↗