DNA–Protein Binding is Dominated by Short Anchoring Elements
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Unveiling the complexities of gene expression regulation, the study explores the intricate DNA‐binding mechanisms of transcription factors (TFs). By employing the KaScape method previously developed to measure both bound and unbound populations at thermodynamic equilibrium, “anchoring elements” (AEs), 3–4 base pair sequences, are identified in Arabidopsis WRKY and human PU.1 TFs crucial for binding affinity. Building on the BEESEM method, the study introduces the AEEscape algorithm, which advances the AE concept by creating a precise model of the position‐specific k‐mer binding energy landscape. This method allows for the direct identification of the dominant role of AEs from experimental data. Moreover, when integrated with genomic data, it reveals an energetic funnel around transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs), which is directly correlated with the density of AEs (AED). The findings not only offer a fresh perspective on TF‐TFBS interactions but also highlight the critical role of AED in gene regulation. These insights can pave the way for innovative strategies to manipulate gene expression.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics · RNA Research and Splicing · RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Gene Function and Modulation Research, School of Life Sciences, and Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC) Peking University Beijing 100871 China
Beijing International Center for Mathematical Research (BICMR) and Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC) Peking University Beijing 100871 China
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41594-019-0287-x10.1038/s41594-019-0287-x ↗
2. Latchman D. S. · Int. J. Exp. Pathol. · 1993 · 74 · 417
3. 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2011.10.00810.1016/j.compbiolchem.2011.10.008 ↗
4. 10.1007/978-90-481-9069-0_1010.1007/978-90-481-9069-0_10 ↗
5. 10.1091/mbc.E22-08-032510.1091/mbc.E22-08-0325 ↗
6. 10.1186/gb-2003-5-1-20110.1186/gb-2003-5-1-201 ↗
7. 10.1093/nar/10.9.299710.1093/nar/10.9.2997 ↗
8. 10.1007/s40484-013-0012-410.1007/s40484-013-0012-4 ↗
9. 10.1002/0471250953.bi0215s5110.1002/0471250953.bi0215s51 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.02910.1016/j.cell.2018.01.029 ↗
11. 10.1093/nar/gku104510.1093/nar/gku1045 ↗
12. 10.1007/978-1-61779-292-2_610.1007/978-1-61779-292-2_6 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41598-023-43426-x10.1038/s41598-023-43426-x ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.03210.1016/j.cell.2004.10.032 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.114131910.1126/science.1141319 ↗
16. 10.1038/nbt.312110.1038/nbt.3121 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41467-018-05265-710.1038/s41467-018-05265-7 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41596-020-0373-x10.1038/s41596-020-0373-x ↗
19. 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.1.1610.1093/bioinformatics/16.1.16 ↗
20. 10.1038/nrg131510.1038/nrg1315 ↗
21. 10.1093/nar/gkl37210.1093/nar/gkl372 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.10599310.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105993 ↗
23. 10.1093/bfgp/elac00910.1093/bfgp/elac009 ↗
24. 10.1146/annurev.genom.7.080505.11574510.1146/annurev.genom.7.080505.115745 ↗
25. 10.1093/nar/gki51910.1093/nar/gki519 ↗
26. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti36110.1093/bioinformatics/bti361 ↗
27. Y.Barash G.Elidan N.Friedman T.Kaplan presented atProceedings of the Seventh Annual Int. Conf. on Research in Computational Molecular Biology ACM Berlin Germany2003.
28. 10.1038/s41598-019-44966-x10.1038/s41598-019-44966-x ↗
29. 10.1371/journal.pone.000972210.1371/journal.pone.0009722 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.tig.2020.12.00110.1016/j.tig.2020.12.001 ↗
31. 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90074-410.1016/0022-2836(70)90074-4 ↗
32. 10.1021/bi00527a02810.1021/bi00527a028 ↗
33. 10.1016/0968-0004(82)90075-510.1016/0968-0004(82)90075-5 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)84994-310.1016/S0021-9258(19)84994-3 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.tig.2009.08.00310.1016/j.tig.2009.08.003 ↗
36. 10.1093/nar/gky68110.1093/nar/gky681 ↗
37. 10.1038/s41467-022-32971-010.1038/s41467-022-32971-0 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41467-019-14217-810.1038/s41467-019-14217-8 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.16810310.1103/PhysRevLett.109.168103 ↗
40. 10.1093/nar/gkx122010.1093/nar/gkx1220 ↗
41. 10.1126/science.add125010.1126/science.add1250 ↗
42. 10.1039/D2CP04820E10.1039/D2CP04820E ↗
43. 10.1016/S0960-0779(98)00182-910.1016/S0960-0779(98)00182-9 ↗
44. 10.1093/nar/gkab99610.1093/nar/gkab996 ↗
45. 10.1038/nprot.2017.05510.1038/nprot.2017.055 ↗
46. 10.1007/s13238-019-00670-010.1007/s13238-019-00670-0 ↗
47. 10.1093/nar/gkt73210.1093/nar/gkt732 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.11267110.1016/j.celrep.2023.112671 ↗
49. 10.1038/emboj.2010.10610.1038/emboj.2010.106 ↗
50. 10.1126/science.122922310.1126/science.1229223 ↗
51. 10.7171/jbt.12-2302-00410.7171/jbt.12-2302-004 ↗
52. 10.1186/1471-2105-13-21510.1186/1471-2105-13-215 ↗
53. 10.1093/nar/gkm95510.1093/nar/gkm955 ↗
54. Hashim F. A. · Avicenna J. Med. Biotechnol. · 2019 · 11 · 130
55. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.04110.1016/j.cell.2014.11.041 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.05.02910.1016/j.cell.2021.05.029 ↗
57. 10.1038/s41586-018-0549-510.1038/s41586-018-0549-5 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.gde.2016.12.00710.1016/j.gde.2016.12.007 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.01910.1016/j.cell.2007.05.019 ↗
60. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx19110.1093/bioinformatics/btx191 ↗