Inherently Disordered Auxetic Metamaterials
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Inherently disordered auxetic systems represent a new class of metamaterial structures, which have the capability of exhibiting advanced functionalities despite the absence of global symmetry and ordered localized periodicity. In this work, disordered frameworks based on the Delaunay‐triangulation network incorporating chiral honeycomb features are proposed. These systems show large auxetic behavior, which is retained irrespective of the extent of disorder and depends entirely on the degree of chiralization. Furthermore, the Young's modulus of these systems can be controlled as a function of seed density, similar to how volume fraction determines stiffness in foams, without altering the auxeticity of these systems. Finally, the wide‐ranging parametric finite element study and experimental tests carried out in this work, revealed that the disordered topology of these systems significantly alters the failure pathways and deformation propagation profile of these metamaterials with respect to their ordered counterparts. The findings of this work clearly demonstrate that advanced functionalities such as auxeticity are not exclusive only to ordered frameworks and that, by harnessing disorder, one may potentially obtain additional superior properties, which are not present in traditional metamaterials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Quasicrystal Structures and Properties · Topological Materials and Phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Sciences and Methods for Engineering University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Reggio Emilia Italy
Funding
Fondazione Cariplo
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.6610.1038/natrevmats.2017.66 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.aao464010.1126/science.aao4640 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20220007010.1002/adma.202200070 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41578-025-00828-910.1038/s41578-025-00828-9 ↗
5. 10.1038/353124a010.1038/353124a0 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20140410610.1002/adma.201404106 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20160395910.1002/adma.201603959 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10761110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107611 ↗
9. 10.1039/C5CP00442J10.1039/C5CP00442J ↗
10. 10.1038/nmat333110.1038/nmat3331 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.10545410.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.105454 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.10990510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.109905 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.10532610.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.105326 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.eml.2025.10229110.1016/j.eml.2025.102291 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20160008810.1002/adma.201600088 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.10078010.1016/j.apmt.2020.100780 ↗
17. 10.1002/adfm.20242163810.1002/adfm.202421638 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.10.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2009.10.005 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.01310.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.013 ↗
20. 10.1002/mame.20210086610.1002/mame.202100866 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.11029110.1016/j.matdes.2021.110291 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apmt.2025.10272210.1016/j.apmt.2025.102722 ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20150365310.1002/adma.201503653 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.508302710.1063/1.5083027 ↗
25. 10.1002/pssb.20138425610.1002/pssb.201384256 ↗
26. Modelling the Effects of Density Variations on the In‐Plane Poisson's Ratios and Young's Moduli of Periodic Conventional and Re‐Entrant Honeycombs‐Part 1: Rib Thickness Variations
27. 10.1080/1358826070178934210.1080/13588260701789342 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.10.04310.1016/j.actamat.2008.10.043 ↗
29. 10.1126/science.235.4792.103810.1126/science.235.4792.1038 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jmps.2018.10.01210.1016/j.jmps.2018.10.012 ↗
31. 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf02310.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf023 ↗
32. 10.1140/epjb/e2018-90073-110.1140/epjb/e2018-90073-1 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.05710.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.057 ↗
34. 10.1002/adma.20230348110.1002/adma.202303481 ↗
35. 10.1038/s42254-023-00639-310.1038/s42254-023-00639-3 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.actamat.2024.12070010.1016/j.actamat.2024.120700 ↗
37. 10.1038/s42005-022-00876-510.1038/s42005-022-00876-5 ↗
38. 10.1088/0964‐1726/22/8/08400910.1088/0964‐1726/22/8/084009 ↗
39. 10.1039/D0FD00008F10.1039/D0FD00008F ↗
40. 10.1073/pnas.171744211510.1073/pnas.1717442115 ↗
41. B.Delaunay “Sur la sphère vide. a la mémoire de georges voronoï ”Bulletin de l'Académie des Sciences de l'URSSno.6(1934):793–800 https://www.mathnet.ru/links/b4438b17363bcf3f2433bb559662648a/im4937.
42. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.10369810.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103698 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11073910.1016/j.tws.2023.110739 ↗
44. 10.1002/adem.20080038810.1002/adem.200800388 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.01.00410.1016/j.actamat.2017.01.004 ↗
46. 10.1007/s10853-009-3940-710.1007/s10853-009-3940-7 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.11142810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111428 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.eml.2019.10061510.1016/j.eml.2019.100615 ↗
49. 10.1007/s10853-008-2841-510.1007/s10853-008-2841-5 ↗
50. O.Duncan T.Allen L.Foster R.Gatt J. N.Grima andA.Alderson “Controlling Density and Modulus in Auxetic Foam Fabrications–Implications for Impact and Indentation Testing ” inProceedings2 no.6(MDPI 2018) 250.10.3390/proceedings2060250 ↗
51. 10.1016/S0020-7403(96)00025-210.1016/S0020-7403(96)00025-2 ↗
52. 10.1098/rsta.2005.167810.1098/rsta.2005.1678 ↗
53. 10.1038/s41586‐018‐0850‐310.1038/s41586‐018‐0850‐3 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10753710.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107537 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10932110.1016/j.matdes.2020.109321 ↗
56. 10.1073/pnas.191153511610.1073/pnas.1911535116 ↗
57. 10.1038/s41586-024-08037-010.1038/s41586-024-08037-0 ↗
58. 10.1108/RPJ-06-2023-019010.1108/RPJ-06-2023-0190 ↗
59. 10.1002/smll.20230736910.1002/smll.202307369 ↗
60. 10.1080/1478644640864366810.1080/14786446408643668 ↗
61. 10.1098/rsta.2012.002910.1098/rsta.2012.0029 ↗
62. 10.1038/s41570-020-00228-310.1038/s41570-020-00228-3 ↗
63. 10.1007/s00366-019-00910-110.1007/s00366-019-00910-1 ↗