journal article·2026-04Open access

Multimodal Cross‐Attentive Graph‐Based Framework for Predicting In Vivo Endocrine Disruptors

Eder Soares de Almeida Santos, Gustavo Felizardo Santos Sandes, Artur Christian Garcia da Silva, Holli‐Joi Martin, Eugene N. Muratov, Rodolpho de Campos Braga, Bruno Junior Neves

Advanced Science· Volume 13· Issue 21

Abstract

ABSTRACT Endocrine hazard assessment needs models that are accurate and mechanistically transparent. We present a multimodal cross‐attentive graph framework that fuses molecular graphs with adverse‐outcome‐pathway (AOP)–anchored assay signals to predict organism‐level outcomes in the organisation for economic co‐operation and development (OECD) Hershberger and uterotrophic assays. In Tier‐1, multitask graph neural networks (GNNs) learn estrogen and androgen receptor molecular‐initiating and key events across 46 in vitro ToxCast/Tox21 assays. In Tier‐2, a cross‐attentive multimodal GNN integrates Tier‐1 pathway signals with molecular graphs, yielding high predictive performance for both the in vivo Hershberger (AUROC = 0.97 ± 0.014) and uterotrophic (AUROC = 0.97 ± 0.008) assays. Retrospective analysis of literature compounds showed 88% concordance (Hershberger 15/18; uterotrophic 23/26). Bidirectional cross‐attention highlights associations between molecular substructures and pathway‐level assay nodes, while counterfactual perturbations rank assays and structural motifs most influential for each decision. The framework couple's high accuracy with assay‐traceable explanations, supporting targeted testing within the integrated approaches.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Graph Neural Networks · Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratory of Cheminformatics, Faculty of Pharmacy Universidade Federal de Goiás Goiás Brazil

Laboratory of Education and Research in In Vitro Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy Universidade Federal de Goiás Goiás Brazil

Laboratory for Molecular Modeling, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

InsilicAll Ltda. São Paulo Brazil

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás · Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior · Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

References (77)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/tx100231n10.1021/tx100231n ↗
2. 10.1007/978-3-031-36494-5_210.1007/978-3-031-36494-5_2 ↗
3. 10.3390/ijms2406534210.3390/ijms24065342 ↗
4. 10.1038/s42003‐024‐06048‐110.1038/s42003‐024‐06048‐1 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.03.03110.1016/j.dsx.2021.03.031 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.envres.2021.11208510.1016/j.envres.2021.112085 ↗
7. 10.1038/nrendo.2015.12510.1038/nrendo.2015.125 ↗
8. 10.1210/jc.2014‐432410.1210/jc.2014‐4324 ↗
9. 10.1080/10408444.2016.127209510.1080/10408444.2016.1272095 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b0013510.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00135 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.0c0026410.1021/acs.chemrestox.0c00264 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.tiv.2022.10545110.1016/j.tiv.2022.105451 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b0034710.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00347 ↗
14. 10.1093/toxsci/kfv16810.1093/toxsci/kfv168 ↗
15. 10.14573/altex.180301110.14573/altex.1803011 ↗
16. 10.1289/ehp.120506510.1289/ehp.1205065 ↗
17. 10.1289/EHP130410.1289/EHP1304 ↗
18. 10.1093/toxsci/kfz05810.1093/toxsci/kfz058 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.08.02610.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.08.026 ↗
20. 10.1289/ehp.151026710.1289/ehp.1510267 ↗
21. 10.1289/EHP558010.1289/EHP5580 ↗
22. 10.1186/s13321‐023‐00721‐z10.1186/s13321‐023‐00721‐z ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.est.2c0224210.1021/acs.est.2c02242 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.14067110.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140671 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.envint.2024.10899510.1016/j.envint.2024.108995 ↗
26. 10.1007/s00204‐020‐02866‐410.1007/s00204‐020‐02866‐4 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00204‐021‐03215‐910.1007/s00204‐021‐03215‐9 ↗
28. 10.1038/s43246‐022‐00315‐610.1038/s43246‐022‐00315‐6 ↗
29. 10.1038/s43586‐024‐00294‐710.1038/s43586‐024‐00294‐7 ↗
30. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad71310.1093/bioinformatics/btad713 ↗
31. 10.1186/s13321‐024‐00902‐410.1186/s13321‐024‐00902‐4 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.envpol.2025.12701110.1016/j.envpol.2025.127011 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2018.08.01610.1016/j.reprotox.2018.08.016 ↗
34. 10.1289/ehp.151018310.1289/ehp.1510183 ↗
35. 10.1021/ci100176x10.1021/ci100176x ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b0012910.1021/acs.jcim.6b00129 ↗
37. 10.1038/s41467‐025‐58606‐810.1038/s41467‐025‐58606‐8 ↗
38. 10.48550/arXiv.1704.0121210.48550/arXiv.1704.01212 ↗
39. 10.48550/arXiv.1710.1090310.48550/arXiv.1710.10903 ↗
40. 10.48550/arXiv.1810.0082610.48550/arXiv.1810.00826 ↗
41. 10.48550/arXiv.2009.0329410.48550/arXiv.2009.03294 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b0095910.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00959 ↗
43. R.Cipolla Y.Gal andA.Kendall “Multi‐Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semantics ” in2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (IEEE 2018) 7482–7491 https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00781.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00781 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ailsci.2021.10001310.1016/j.ailsci.2021.100013 ↗
45. 10.1021/ci100050t10.1021/ci100050t ↗
46. 10.1289/EHP558010.1289/EHP5580 ↗
47. 10.1186/s13321‐018‐0263‐110.1186/s13321‐018‐0263‐1 ↗
48. 10.1289/EHP666410.1289/EHP6664 ↗
49. 10.1093/toxsci/kfw09210.1093/toxsci/kfw092 ↗
50. 10.1021/acs.est.6b0623010.1021/acs.est.6b06230 ↗
51. 10.1002/etc.450510.1002/etc.4505 ↗
52. National Toxicology Program · 2012
53. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency · 2012
54. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research · 2013
55. 10.1093/toxsci/kfae14410.1093/toxsci/kfae144 ↗
56. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research · 2010
57. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research · 2012
58. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research · 2016
59. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2025.10895510.1016/j.reprotox.2025.108955 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.11878010.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.118780 ↗
61. 10.1007/s00204‐023‐03623‐z10.1007/s00204‐023‐03623‐z ↗
62. 10.1093/biolre/ioad11110.1093/biolre/ioad111 ↗
63. 10.1080/15287394.2020.179883210.1080/15287394.2020.1798832 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.10590010.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105900 ↗
65. 10.1210/en.2005‐003010.1210/en.2005‐0030 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2021.09.00410.1016/j.toxlet.2021.09.004 ↗
67. 10.2131/jts.37.87910.2131/jts.37.879 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.phoj.2024.03.00510.1016/j.phoj.2024.03.005 ↗
69. 10.1093/toxsci/48.2.19710.1093/toxsci/48.2.197 ↗
70. 10.1210/endo.141.2.734210.1210/endo.141.2.7342 ↗
71. Effect of Intramuscular Norethisterone Enanthate on Compensatory Ovarian Hypertrophy in the Rat
72. 10.1093/toxsci/60.1.5610.1093/toxsci/60.1.56 ↗
73. 10.1016/s0303‐7207(98)00084‐710.1016/s0303‐7207(98)00084‐7 ↗
74. 10.1093/toxsci/56.2.33210.1093/toxsci/56.2.332 ↗
75. 10.1289/ehp.090181910.1289/ehp.0901819 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.11403610.1016/j.envpol.2020.114036 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.11396210.1016/j.envpol.2020.113962 ↗