journal article·2026-04Open access

A Protein‐Centric Strategy Coupled with Match‐Between‐Run Glycoproteomics Enables Discovery of Robust Site‐Specific Glycan Biomarkers for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Lei Liu, Taiheng Ma, Qi Liu, He Zhu, Zheng Fang, Jiahong Ma, Ting Yu, Yan Wang, Jiahua Zhou, Xiaoyan Liu, Yaqian Li, Zhimou Guo, Xinmiao Liang, Mingming Dong, Deguang Sun, Mingliang Ye

Advanced Science· Volume 13· Issue 22

Abstract

ABSTRACT Dysregulated protein glycosylation is a hallmark of cancer, and systematic investigation of glycosylation patterns is crucial for identifying biomarkers. However, current glycoproteomic studies are constrained by the limited quantification power of single MS files and focus on dysregulated glycopeptides while neglecting the underlying glycoproteins. To address this, we proposed a protein‐centric strategy to prioritize proteins susceptible to aberrant glycosylation, aiming to uncover previously overlooked cancer‐associated proteins. In this study, we analyzed 200 samples via quantitative glycoproteomics on an integrated platform. Notably, the Glyco‐Decipher software's new match‐between‐run scheme was applied in a large‐scale serum‐based HCC cohort study to enhance single‐shot intact glycopeptide profiling, boosting detection of significantly dysregulated site‐specific glycans 4.8‐fold compared to conventional method. The protein‐centric strategy identified 26 glycoproteins, with Fibronectin emerging as a top diagnostic performer. Specifically, the N1007_H5N4S2 on Fibronectin exhibited excellent diagnostic performance for HCC, achieving an AUC value of 0.917. Furthermore, a machine learning model integrating N1007_H5N4S2 on Fibronectin and N107_H9N3 on Alpha‐1‐antitrypsin yielded AUC values of 0.950/0.973 (HCC), 0.976/0.922 (TNM‐I HCC), and 0.948/0.867 (AFP‐negative HCC) in two cohorts, respectively. These findings demonstrated the effectiveness of the protein‐centric strategy in identifying robust biomarkers, highlighting the potential of site‐specific glycans for improving HCC diagnosis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research · Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications · vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Medical Proteomics, CAS Key Laboratory of Separation Science For Analytical Chemistry Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences Dalian China

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China

Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University Dalian China

MOE Key Laboratory of Bio‐Intelligent Manufacturing School of Bioengineering Dalian University of Technology Dalian China

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41580‐020‐00294‐x10.1038/s41580‐020‐00294‐x ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jaut.2014.12.00210.1016/j.jaut.2014.12.002 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.291.5512.237010.1126/science.291.5512.2370 ↗
4. 10.1042/BCJ2017085310.1042/BCJ20170853 ↗
5. 10.1007/s12094‐012‐0756‐810.1007/s12094‐012‐0756‐8 ↗
6. 10.1038/nrurol.2012.25810.1038/nrurol.2012.258 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0009‐8981(01)00644‐110.1016/S0009‐8981(01)00644‐1 ↗
8. 10.3390/v1404077510.3390/v14040775 ↗
9. 10.1186/s12964‐024‐01569‐y10.1186/s12964‐024‐01569‐y ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c0017510.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00175 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.aca.2024.34306610.1016/j.aca.2024.343066 ↗
12. 10.3389/fonc.2022.81800110.3389/fonc.2022.818001 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.13556310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.135563 ↗
14. 10.3390/metabo1108056310.3390/metabo11080563 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b0065410.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00654 ↗
16. 10.3389/fonc.2023.121389810.3389/fonc.2023.1213898 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c0027010.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00270 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c0022710.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00227 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0260010.1021/acsomega.2c02600 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.12149910.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121499 ↗
21. 10.1093/nsr/nwac05910.1093/nsr/nwac059 ↗
22. 10.1002/advs.20230695510.1002/advs.202306955 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41392‐023‐01645‐810.1038/s41392‐023‐01645‐8 ↗
24. 10.1126/sciadv.abc580210.1126/sciadv.abc5802 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41467‐022‐35172‐x10.1038/s41467‐022‐35172‐x ↗
26. 10.1038/s41592‐020‐0967‐910.1038/s41592‐020‐0967‐9 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mcpro.2021.10007710.1016/j.mcpro.2021.100077 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.14844210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.148442 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41467‐025‐61673‐610.1038/s41467‐025‐61673‐6 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41467‐022‐29530‐y10.1038/s41467‐022‐29530‐y ↗
31. 10.1038/s41467‐020‐19976‐310.1038/s41467‐020‐19976‐3 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c0042010.1021/acs.analchem.0c00420 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41419‐023‐05733‐z10.1038/s41419‐023‐05733‐z ↗
34. 10.1159/00053789710.1159/000537897 ↗
35. 10.18632/oncotarget.2015310.18632/oncotarget.20153 ↗
36. 10.1158/1055‐9965.EPI‐13‐087010.1158/1055‐9965.EPI‐13‐0870 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jceh.2025.10320310.1016/j.jceh.2025.103203 ↗
38. 10.21037/jlpm.2019.02.0210.21037/jlpm.2019.02.02 ↗
39. 10.1002/mas.2158310.1002/mas.21583 ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c0064510.1021/acs.analchem.1c00645 ↗
41. 10.1007/s00216‐024‐05499‐z10.1007/s00216‐024‐05499‐z ↗
42. 10.1093/nar/gkw108010.1093/nar/gkw1080 ↗