journal article·2026-03Open access

Pathomics Signature for Prognosis and CA19‐9 Interception in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Real‐Life, Multi‐Center Study

Qiangda Chen, Zhihang Xu, Yiping Zou, Zhenlai Jiang, Yecheng Li, Taochen He, Hanlin Yin, Jiali Li, Yanfei An, Jiande Han, Yuqi Xie, Wei Gan, Yaolin Xu, Wenquan Wang, Junyi He, Haibo Wang, Wenchuan Wu, Zhenyu Ye, Wenhui Lou, Jihui Hao, Liang Liu, Jun Yu, Ning Pu

Advanced Science· Volume 13· Issue 16

Abstract

ABSTRACT Histopathological hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides contain valuable prognostic information for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), yet systematic feature extraction remains challenging. This multi‐center study developed and validated an automated prognostic model using deep learning on digitized whole‐slide images from 873 PDAC patients with surgical resection across three academic centers. The CrossFormer architecture achieved superior performance in external validation (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.774), significantly outperforming ResNet‐18 (AUC = 0.716), ResNet‐50 (AUC = 0.737), and DenseNet‐121 (AUC = 0.729). Gradient‐weighted Class Activation Mapping identified key prognostic features including desmoplastic stroma, high nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio, tumor necrosis, and immune cell infiltration. The pathomics signature effectively stratified patients into low‐risk and high‐risk groups with significant survival differences ( p < 0.001). Critically, carbohydrate antigen 19‐9 (CA19‐9) retained prognostic value only in low‐risk patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.70, p < 0.001) but not in high‐risk patients (HR = 0.998, p = 0.990). High‐risk patients derived substantial benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 0.56, p = 0.038), whereas low‐risk patients showed no significant benefit (HR = 0.83, p = 0.562). These findings provide actionable clinical insights: treatment intensification for high‐risk patients and CA19‐9‐guided monitoring for low‐risk patients. This validated, interpretable model transforms routine H&E slides into quantitative prognostic tools, enabling personalized treatment strategies without additional testing costs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research · AI in cancer detection · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Pancreatic Surgery Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai China

Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University Fuzhou China

Cancer Center Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai China

Pancreas Center Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital National Clinical Research Center for Cancer State Key Laboratory of Druggability Evaluation and Systematic Translational Medicine Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer Tianjin China

Department of General Surgery The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou China

Department of Pathology Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai China

Medical College of Yangzhou University Yangzhou China

Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Cancer (Fujian Medical University), Ministry of Education School of Basic Medical Sciences Fujian Medical University Fuzhou China

Funding

Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Shanghai Municipal Health Commission · Beijing Xisike Clinical Oncology Research Foundation

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3322/caac.2187110.3322/caac.21871 ↗
2. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.470810.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.4708 ↗
3. 10.1038/nature1696510.1038/nature16965 ↗
4. 10.1038/nm.234410.1038/nm.2344 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41588‐022‐01157‐110.1038/s41588‐022‐01157‐1 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ccell.2025.06.02010.1016/j.ccell.2025.06.020 ↗
7. 10.3892/ijo.2020.498910.3892/ijo.2020.4989 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.07.00410.1016/j.ccell.2022.07.004 ↗
9. 10.1158/1538‐7445.AM2022‐506010.1158/1538‐7445.AM2022‐5060 ↗
10. 10.1371/journal.pone.030196910.1371/journal.pone.0301969 ↗
11. 10.1038/nrc313110.1038/nrc3131 ↗
12. 10.1038/ncomms1509510.1038/ncomms15095 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jpi.2022.10015810.1016/j.jpi.2022.100158 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41588‐024‐01914‐410.1038/s41588‐024‐01914‐4 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41591‐023‐02640‐w10.1038/s41591‐023‐02640‐w ↗
16. 10.1038/s41591‐023‐02332‐510.1038/s41591‐023‐02332‐5 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.18840910.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188409 ↗
18. 10.1136/bmj‐2022‐07399510.1136/bmj‐2022‐073995 ↗
19. 10.1016/s1470‐2045(19)30154‐810.1016/s1470‐2045(19)30154‐8 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41416‐020‐01122‐x10.1038/s41416‐020‐01122‐x ↗
21. Y.ZhangandJ.Yan 2023 Inter. Conf. on Learning Representations (ICLR) IEEE2023 https://openreview.net/forum?id=vSVLM2j9eie.
22. L.Deininger B.Stimpel A.Yüce et al. A Comparative Study Between Vision Transformers and CNNs in Digital Pathology arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.003892022 https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2206.00389.
23. A.Dosovitskiy L.Beyer A.Kolesnikov et al. in2021 Inter. Conf. on Learning Representations (ICLR) Virtual Event 2021 https://openreview.net/forum?id=YicbFdNTTy.
24. 10.1038/s41586‐025‐09370‐810.1038/s41586‐025‐09370‐8 ↗
25. 10.1073/pnas.132031811010.1073/pnas.1320318110 ↗
26. 10.1158/2159‐8290.Cd‐20‐084110.1158/2159‐8290.Cd‐20‐0841 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.01.00710.1016/j.ccr.2012.01.007 ↗
28. 10.1158/0008‐5472.Can‐13‐280010.1158/0008‐5472.Can‐13‐2800 ↗
29. 10.1136/gutjnl‐2012‐30252910.1136/gutjnl‐2012‐302529 ↗
30. 10.1038/nrc321910.1038/nrc3219 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41416‐023‐02258‐210.1038/s41416‐023‐02258‐2 ↗
32. 10.1155/2018/353747110.1155/2018/3537471 ↗
33. 10.1038/sj.bjc.660585410.1038/sj.bjc.6605854 ↗
34. 10.1093/ajcp/83.2.17110.1093/ajcp/83.2.171 ↗
35. 10.1158/0008‐5472.Can‐13‐372310.1158/0008‐5472.Can‐13‐3723 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.10.00610.1016/j.ccell.2018.10.006 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0021‐9258(17)39378‐X10.1016/S0021‐9258(17)39378‐X ↗
38. 10.1158/2159‐8290.Cd‐22‐041210.1158/2159‐8290.Cd‐22‐0412 ↗
39. 10.1038/ng.339810.1038/ng.3398 ↗
40. 10.3390/ijms2018450410.3390/ijms20184504 ↗
41. 10.1038/s41571‐024‐00932‐910.1038/s41571‐024‐00932‐9 ↗
42. 10.7171/3fc1f5fe.3eccea0110.7171/3fc1f5fe.3eccea01 ↗
43. 10.1186/s13045‐024‐01613‐x10.1186/s13045‐024‐01613‐x ↗
44. 10.1136/jitc‐2023‐00869410.1136/jitc‐2023‐008694 ↗
45. M.Macenko M.Niethammer J. S.Marron et al. in2009 IEEE Inter Symp on Biomed Imaging (ISBI) IEEE 2009 1107–1110 https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2009.5193250.10.1109/ISBI.2009.5193250 ↗
46. K.He X.Zhang S.Ren andJ.Sun in2016 IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) IEEE 2016 770–778 https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
47. G.Huang Z.Liu L. V. D.Maaten andK. Q.Weinberger in2017 IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) IEEE 2017 2261–2269 https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.243.10.1109/CVPR.2017.243 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.media.2019.03.00910.1016/j.media.2019.03.009 ↗