journal article·2026-03Open access

Dead Matter, Living Machines: Repurposing Crustaceans' Abdomen Exoskeleton for Bio‐Hybrid Robots

Sareum Kim, Kieran Gilday, Josie Hughes

Advanced Science· Volume 13· Issue 15

Abstract

Abstract Bio‐hybrid robots utilize living organisms for robot design, however, their use of living bodies makes maintenance, control, and fabrication of robot challenging. As an alternative, exoskeletons stand out for retaining mobility after the organism's death, making them an accessible candidate. In particular, crustacean exoskeletons, often discarded as food waste, provide both structural strength and flexibility from their segmented rigid shell. By repurposing dead animals' part from bio‐waste, a sustainable cyclic design process is proposed in which materials can be recycled and adapted for new tasks after a robot's lifespan. In this paper, a bio‐hybrid robot design using the langoustine abdominal exoskeleton as a bending actuator is introduced. Through integration with synthetic components, augmented exoskeletons can generate diverse, fast, and robust motions with extended operational lifetimes. Three robotic applications are demonstrated using a 3 g exoskeleton capable of supporting a 680 g payload: a manipulator handling objects up to 500 g, fingers that grasp various objects and bend at speeds up to 8 Hz, and a swimming robot at speeds up to 11 cm s −1 . The method offers a sustainable robot design scheme and can be extended to diverse scales and functionalities by exploring a wide range of repurposable exoskeletons from bio‐waste.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Robotic Locomotion and Control · Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics · Soft Robotics and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

The CREATE lab Institute of Mechanical Engineering School of Engineering, EPFl Lausanne 1015 Switzerland

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.114580310.1126/science.1145803 ↗
2. 10.1145/2366316.236633510.1145/2366316.2366335 ↗
3. 10.1038/nature1044710.1038/nature10447 ↗
4. 10.1163/15685610332211378810.1163/156856103322113788 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.aab163710.1126/science.aab1637 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20200313910.1002/adma.202003139 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.procs.2011.09.08310.1016/j.procs.2011.09.083 ↗
8. 10.1126/scirobotics.adr612510.1126/scirobotics.adr6125 ↗
9. 10.1088/1748-3190/ac9c3b10.1088/1748-3190/ac9c3b ↗
10. 10.1126/science.aaf429210.1126/science.aaf4292 ↗
11. 10.1039/D0CS00120A10.1039/D0CS00120A ↗
12. 10.1007/978-3-319-63537-8_4010.1007/978-3-319-63537-8_40 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20230371410.1002/adma.202303714 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20231390610.1002/adma.202313906 ↗
15. 10.1038/scientificamerican1210-9410.1038/scientificamerican1210-94 ↗
16. 10.1109/TRO.2022.315210210.1109/TRO.2022.3152102 ↗
17. J.Galipon S.Shimizu K.Tadakuma arXiv preprint2023 2306.03906.
18. 10.1073/pnas.231045812110.1073/pnas.2310458121 ↗
19. 10.1088/1748-3190/adc0d410.1088/1748-3190/adc0d4 ↗
20. 10.1002/advs.20220117410.1002/advs.202201174 ↗
21. 10.1002/adrr.20240002010.1002/adrr.202400020 ↗
22. 10.1002/adrr.20250013710.1002/adrr.202500137 ↗
23. 10.1088/1748-3190/abbd8110.1088/1748-3190/abbd81 ↗
24. 10.1038/s44182-025-00020-910.1038/s44182-025-00020-9 ↗
25. 10.1126/scirobotics.adk801910.1126/scirobotics.adk8019 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.06710.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.067 ↗
27. 10.1038/nrg172410.1038/nrg1724 ↗
28. 10.1017/S026359330001038510.1017/S0263593300010385 ↗
29. 10.1242/jeb.56.1.110.1242/jeb.56.1.1 ↗
30. 10.1242/jeb.79.1.24510.1242/jeb.79.1.245 ↗
31. 10.1242/jeb.21987310.1242/jeb.219873 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.02710.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.027 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.12.01010.1016/j.actbio.2007.12.010 ↗
34. 10.1098/rsfs.2023.007510.1098/rsfs.2023.0075 ↗
35. 10.1088/1748-3190/ab9c8d10.1088/1748-3190/ab9c8d ↗
36. Chen Y. · 2017 · 4782
37. 10.1126/sciadv.adv662910.1126/sciadv.adv6629 ↗
38. 10.1016/0016-7037(95)00012-710.1016/0016-7037(95)00012-7 ↗
39. 10.1016/S0146-6380(97)00113-710.1016/S0146-6380(97)00113-7 ↗
40. A. G.Billard Designing and using robots for environmental sustainability 2025.10.1126/science.adx2444 ↗
41. 10.1007/s00360-007-0226-810.1007/s00360-007-0226-8 ↗
42. Kuropka M. Żak, P. · Acta Bioeng. Biomech. · 2011 · 13 · 37
43. 10.1098/rsif.2018.042710.1098/rsif.2018.0427 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.05.00110.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.05.001 ↗
45. Sainudin M. S. · 2019 · 012033
46. 10.3389/fmars.2021.61201610.3389/fmars.2021.612016 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10851310.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108513 ↗
48. 10.1007/BF0068941710.1007/BF00689417 ↗
49. A. T.Masterman Edinburgh E. & S. Livingstone1902.
50. Kim S. · 2025 · 1
51. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-57510.1186/1471-2164-9-575 ↗
52. Fabritius H. · 2010 · 35
53. 10.1242/jeb.14961710.1242/jeb.149617 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.esci.2024.10025010.1016/j.esci.2024.100250 ↗
55. McGloin H. · 2024 · 107
56. 10.1002/adma.20200264010.1002/adma.202002640 ↗
57. 10.1002/sus2.20510.1002/sus2.205 ↗
58. 10.1007/s42765-022-00254-410.1007/s42765-022-00254-4 ↗
59. 10.1002/adma.20210842710.1002/adma.202108427 ↗
60. Fish F. E. · 2013 · 287
61. A.Kazakidi M.Kuba A.Botvinnik M.Sfakiotakis T.Gutnick S.Hanassy G.Levy J. A.Ekaterinaris T.Flash B.Hochner in22nd Annual Meeting NCM Society 2012 pp.23–29.