Effect of Additional Terminal Residues on the Folding and Unfolding Dynamics of Cold Shock Protein
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Enhancing protein stability through modifications to the N‐ and C‐termini of natural proteins offers the distinct advantages of safety and cost‐effectiveness when compared to the denovo design of proteins. To explore the effect of additional residues at the termini on protein stability, single‐molecule magnetic tweezers are employed to examine the folding and unfolding dynamics of Cold Shock Protein (CSP) with various appended residues (LE‐CSP‐GS, KL‐CSP‐GS, KL‐CSP‐LE). The unfolding rate constant of the LE‐CSP‐GS is an order of magnitude faster than the others, while its folding rate constant decreased by more than an order of magnitude, resulting in upto ≈5 k B T bigger in folding free energy. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations revealed that the stability differences are due to additional hydrogen bonds formed by residues K6 and E56. The combination of single‐molecule experiments and MD simulations indicates that additional residues at the termini can significantly affect protein stability and dynamics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Protein Structure and Dynamics · Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research · Protein purification and stability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics Wenzhou University Wenzhou 325035 China
Center of Biomedical Physics Wenzhou Institute University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Wenzhou 325000 China
Research Institute for Biomimetics and Soft Matter Fujian Provincial Key Lab for Soft Functional Materials Research Department of Physics Xiamen University Xiamen 361005 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1093/molbev/msx08610.1093/molbev/msx086 ↗
2. 10.1371/journal.pone.001134710.1371/journal.pone.0011347 ↗
3. 10.1007/s00775005035610.1007/s007750050356 ↗
4. 10.1021/jacs.4c1426710.1021/jacs.4c14267 ↗
5. 10.1073/pnas.152267411310.1073/pnas.1522674113 ↗
6. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.30128610.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.301286 ↗
7. 10.1002/ange.20170041110.1002/ange.201700411 ↗
8. 10.1038/nrm119810.1038/nrm1198 ↗
9. 10.3390/ijms2317983610.3390/ijms23179836 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41467-017-02528-710.1038/s41467-017-02528-7 ↗
11. 10.1186/s12964-018-0274-610.1186/s12964-018-0274-6 ↗
12. 10.1110/ps.8.2.39410.1110/ps.8.2.394 ↗
13. 10.1002/prot.2172910.1002/prot.21729 ↗
14. 10.1021/jp310442s10.1021/jp310442s ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.02317010.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.023170 ↗
16. 10.1038/nsb0398-22910.1038/nsb0398-229 ↗
17. 10.1021/bi010638310.1021/bi0106383 ↗
18. 10.1038/s42004-021-00592-110.1038/s42004-021-00592-1 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0155010.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01550 ↗
20. 10.1529/biophysj.106.08289110.1529/biophysj.106.082891 ↗
21. 10.1073/pnas.111548510910.1073/pnas.1115485109 ↗
22. 10.1039/D1NR01907D10.1039/D1NR01907D ↗
23. 10.1073/pnas.040003310110.1073/pnas.0400033101 ↗
24. 10.1126/science.122449210.1126/science.1224492 ↗
25. 10.1021/ma00130a00810.1021/ma00130a008 ↗
26. 10.1021/ja511936810.1021/ja5119368 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.08810110.1103/PhysRevLett.118.088101 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.22810410.1103/PhysRevLett.96.228104 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w ↗
30. 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.11.343110.1016/j.bpj.2015.11.3431 ↗
31. 10.1038/nmeth.406710.1038/nmeth.4067 ↗
32. 10.1038/ncomms1177710.1038/ncomms11777 ↗
33. 10.7554/eLife.3049310.7554/eLife.30493 ↗