Hinst: Human‐Like Interactive Instinct Enables Robots to Robustly Accomplish Universal Tasks
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Robots have enormous potential to assist humans in daily life. However, current robot development and popularization are impeded by its deficient functionality, lengthy task deployment, and vast experimental training. Poor flexibility, poor practicality, and poor universality in task accomplishment hinder robot applications. Here, a human‐like interactive instinct (Hinst) and a Hinst robotic architecture are proposed to enable robots to flexibly and robustly accomplish universal tasks in the real world. The Hinst architecture incorporates multimodal senses, logical decision‐making, and initiative task‐execution, casting robots with human‐like instinctive reaction and intelligence expansion. The robot is empowered with instinctive interaction ability relying on its inherent touch‐sense‐feedback, knowledge‐driven cognition, and adaptive‐control, while its high‐level intelligence of task‐planning and action‐skills are nurtured from acquired knowledge‐learning or human‐teaching. The Hinst greatly enhances the efficiency and the success rate of robotic manipulation, skill learning, and task execution. This anthropomorphic architecture offers a generalizable and universal pathway for general‐purpose robots (especially humanoid robots) to robustly accomplish complex housework and industrial skilled work.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Robot Manipulation and Learning · Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Precision Instrument State Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement Technology and Instruments Tsinghua University Beijing 100084 China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. H.Bharadhwaj J.Vakil M.Sharma A.Gupta S.Tulsiani V.Kumar in2024 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) IEEE Yokohama Japan2024 pp.4788–4795.10.1109/ICRA57147.2024.10611293 ↗
2. D.Kalashnikov J.Varley Y.Chebotar B.Swanson R.Jonschkowski C.Finn S.Levine K.Hausman inProc. of the 5th Conf. on Robot Learning PMLR 2021 164 pp.557–575.
3. S.Nasiriany H. H.Liu Y. K.Zhu 2022 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation ICRA2022 pp.7477–7484.10.1109/ICRA46639.2022.9812140 ↗
4. C.Wang H.Shi W.Wang R.Zhang L.Fei‐Fei C. K.Liu arXiv2024 arXiv.2403.07788.
5. Z.Fu T. Z.Zhao C.Finn arXiv2024 arXiv.2401.02117.
6. 10.1109/TCYB.2024.339562610.1109/TCYB.2024.3395626 ↗
7. 10.1007/s10514-023-10133-510.1007/s10514-023-10133-5 ↗
8. Ha H. · Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2023 · 229 · 3766
9. Y.Jin D.Li Y.A J.Shi P.Hao F.Sun J.Zhang B.Fang IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters IEEE 2024 9 pp.2543–2550.10.1109/LRA.2024.3357432 ↗
10. S. S.Kannan V. L. N.Venkatesh B. C.Min 2024 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) IEEE Abu Dhabi UAE 2024 pp.12140–12147.10.1109/IROS58592.2024.10802322 ↗
11. N.Wake A.Kanehira K.Sasabuchi J.Takamatsu K.Ikeuchi IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters IEEE 2024 9 pp.10567–10574.10.1109/LRA.2024.3477090 ↗
12. M.Xu P.Huang W.Yu S.Liu X.Zhang Y.Niu T.Zhang F.Xia J.Tan D.Zhao arXiv2023 arXiv.2310.13065.
13. 10.1038/s42256-025-01005-x10.1038/s42256-025-01005-x ↗
14. W.Huang C.Wang Y.Li R.Zhang L.Fei‐Fei arXiv2024 arXiv.2409.01652.
15. P.Liu Y.Orru J.Vakil C.Paxton N. M.Mahi Shafiullah L.Pinto arXiv2024 arXiv.2401.12202.
16. J.Gao B.Sarkar F.Xia T.Xiao J.Wu B.Ichter A.Majumdar D.Sadigh 2024 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) IEEE Yokohama Japan 2024 pp.12462–12469.10.1109/ICRA57147.2024.10610090 ↗
17. S. W.Cui R.Wang J. H.Wei F. R.Li S.Wang 2020 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2020 pp.538–544.10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9196787 ↗
18. Edmonds M. · Sci. Rob. · 2019 · 4
19. A.Grover P.Nadeau C.Grebe J.Kelly 2022 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) IEEE Philadelphia PA2022.
20. Hoof H. · IEEE‐Ras. Int. C. Human · 2015 · 121
21. J. W.James N. F.Lepora IEEE Transactions on Robotics IEEE 2021 37 pp.506–519.10.1109/TRO.2020.3031245 ↗
22. J. H.Li S. Y.Dong E.Adelson 2018 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) IEEE Brisbane QLD 2018 pp.7772–7777.
23. 10.1126/scirobotics.adl062810.1126/scirobotics.adl0628 ↗
24. Y.Han K.Yu R.Batra N.Boyd C.Mehta T.Zhao Y.She S.Hutchinson Y.Zhao IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics IEEE 2025 30 pp.554–556.10.1109/TMECH.2024.3400789 ↗
25. 10.1038/s42256-025-01053-310.1038/s42256-025-01053-3 ↗
26. 10.3390/machines906011910.3390/machines9060119 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41467-024-51261-510.1038/s41467-024-51261-5 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.8b1863910.1021/acsami.8b18639 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conb.2006.10.00510.1016/j.conb.2006.10.005 ↗
30. 10.1126/scirobotics.abc813410.1126/scirobotics.abc8134 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.9b2147410.1021/acsami.9b21474 ↗
32. F.Zhang V.Bazarevsky A.Vakunov A.Tkachenka G.Sung C.Chang M.Grundmann arXiv2020 arXiv.2006.10214.
33. 10.1002/advs.20210496910.1002/advs.202104969 ↗