Artificial Intelligence Is Stereotypically Linked More with Socially Dominant Groups in Natural Language
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Despite the increasingly important role that artificial intelligence (AI) plays in society, its social representation remains underexplored. This study reveals that AI is asymmetrically stereotyped, being more closely associated with socially dominant groups. This conclusion is based on these investigations of AI's associations along the warmth–competence dimensions of the stereotype content model, its connections with socially advantaged (e.g., men, young, rich, white) versus disadvantaged (e.g., women, old, poor, non‐white) demographic groups, and its perceived impact on high‐ versus low‐prestige occupations. Across four studies using language‐based analyses with static word embeddings, BERT‐based models, and GPT‐4o, as well as human‐participant experiment validation, it is found that i) AI is strongly associated with high competence but exhibits variability in the warmth dimension (Study 1); ii) AI is more closely linked to advantaged demographic groups (Study 2); iii) advantaged demographic groups are semantically closer to AI than their disadvantaged counterparts along the warmth–competence dimensions (Study 3); and iv) high‐prestige occupations (rather than low‐prestige ones) are associated more strongly with AI's benefits than with its threats. Together, these findings indicate that public perceptions of AI are systematically biased toward socially dominant groups, potentially reinforcing existing social inequalities and raising concerns about an emerging “AI divide.”
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Language and cultural evolution · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Misinformation and Its Impacts
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health Institute of Psychology Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100101 China
Department of Psychology University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100049 China
School of Psychology and Cognitive Science East China Normal University Shanghai 200062 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Beijing Municipal Office of Philosophy and Social Science Planning
References (69)
Show source-provided references
1. F.Gilardi M.Alizadeh M.Kubli ChatGPT outperforms crowd workers for text‐annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2023 120 p.2305016120.10.1073/pnas.2305016120 ↗
2. 10.1080/08874417.2021.196221310.1080/08874417.2021.1962213 ↗
3. Dong M. · American Psychologist · 2024 · 1
4. Wang W. · Global Media and China · 2023 · 1
5. 10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.00710.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007 ↗
6. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00275.x10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00275.x ↗
7. 10.1016/j.chbr.2021.10009210.1016/j.chbr.2021.100092 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.00610.1016/j.chb.2011.09.006 ↗
9. 10.1007/s12369-014-0267-610.1007/s12369-014-0267-6 ↗
10. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.0181010.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810 ↗
11. 10.1177/096372141773882510.1177/0963721417738825 ↗
12. 10.1002/ejsp.197810.1002/ejsp.1978 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41562-023-01705-710.1038/s41562-023-01705-7 ↗
14. P.Khadpe R.Krishna F. F.Li J. T.Hancock M. S.Bernstein Conceptual metaphors impact perceptions of human‐AI collaboration. Proceedings of the ACM on Human‐Computer Interaction 2020 4(CSCW2) 163.10.1145/3415234 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.isci.2023.10725610.1016/j.isci.2023.107256 ↗
16. 10.1145/331178810.1145/3311788 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.01810.1016/j.tra.2018.08.018 ↗
18. P.Schermerhorn M.Scheutz C. R.Crowell Robot social presence and gender: Do females view robots differently than males? Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction 2008 p.263–270.10.1145/1349822.1349857 ↗
19. 10.1007/s11199-007-9191-710.1007/s11199-007-9191-7 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.econlet.2024.11181410.1016/j.econlet.2024.111814 ↗
21. 10.5089/9798400262548.00610.5089/9798400262548.006 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41562-024-02020-510.1038/s41562-024-02020-5 ↗
23. 10.1111/jems.1257610.1111/jems.12576 ↗
24. A.Humlum E.Vestergaard The Unequal Adoption of ChatGPT Exacerbates Existing Inequalities among Workers Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2024 122 p.2414972121.10.1073/pnas.2414972121 ↗
25. Impact Research · 2024
26. D.Carvajal C.Franco S.Isaksson Will Artificial Intelligence get in the Way of Achieving Gender Equality? Discussion Paper Series in Economics from Norwegian School of Economics 2024 p. No.03.10.2139/ssrn.4759218 ↗
27. 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae19110.1093/pnasnexus/pgae191 ↗
28. M.Chaqfeh R.Asim B.AlShebli M. F.Zaffar T.Rahwan Y.Zaki Towards a World Wide Web Without Digital Inequality Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2023 120 2212649120.10.1073/pnas.2212649120 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00001-910.1016/S0065-2601(07)00001-9 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.00510.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005 ↗
31. 10.1017/pan.2023.210.1017/pan.2023.2 ↗
32. T. E.Charlesworth A.Caliskan M. R.Banaji Historical Representations of Social Groups Across 200 Years of Word Embeddings from Google Books Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2022 119 p.2121798119.10.1073/pnas.2121798119 ↗
33. N.Garg L.Schiebinger D.Jurafsky J.Zou Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypes Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2018 115(16) p.E3635–E3644.10.1073/pnas.1720347115 ↗
34. 10.1126/science.adi177810.1126/science.adi1778 ↗
35. Bengio Y. · Journal of Machine Learning Research · 2003 · 3 · 1137
36. A.Toney‐Wails A.Caliskan ValNorm Quantifies Semantics to Reveal Consistent Valence Biases Across Languages and over Centuries Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 2021 p.7203–7218.10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.574 ↗
37. 10.1126/science.aal423010.1126/science.aal4230 ↗
38. 10.1126/sciadv.abm246310.1126/sciadv.abm2463 ↗
39. 10.48550/arXiv.2402.0619610.48550/arXiv.2402.06196 ↗
40. Bao H. W. S. · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 2024 · 127 · 537
41. 10.1111/bjso.1274810.1111/bjso.12748 ↗
42. 10.1038/s41586-024-07856-510.1038/s41586-024-07856-5 ↗
43. 10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.1610.1037/0022-3514.91.1.16 ↗
44. 10.1080/00221309.2020.185350210.1080/00221309.2020.1853502 ↗
45. 10.1016/S0091-6773(74)90289-210.1016/S0091-6773(74)90289-2 ↗
46. B.Kurdi T. C.Mann T. E.Charlesworth M. R.Banaji The Relationship between Implicit Intergroup Attitudes and Beliefs Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2019 116 5862.10.1073/pnas.1820240116 ↗
47. 10.1002/ejsp.272410.1002/ejsp.2724 ↗
48. 10.18637/jss.v036.i0310.18637/jss.v036.i03 ↗
49. J.Pennington R.Socher C. D.Manning Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing 2014 p.1532–1543.10.3115/v1/D14-1162 ↗
50. Mikolov T. · arXiv · 2017
51. 10.3758/s13423-017-1323-710.3758/s13423-017-1323-7 ↗
52. 10.5465/annals.2018.005710.5465/annals.2018.0057 ↗
53. 10.1038/s41586-024-07146-010.1038/s41586-024-07146-0 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.10368110.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103681 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.00510.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.005 ↗
56. 10.1002/mar.2148010.1002/mar.21480 ↗
57. 10.1108/IJCHM-12-2020-140610.1108/IJCHM-12-2020-1406 ↗
58. 10.1108/APJML-09-2023-093910.1108/APJML-09-2023-0939 ↗
59. 10.3389/frobt.2021.64044410.3389/frobt.2021.640444 ↗
60. K. C.Fraser S.Kiritchenko I.Nejadgholi Extracting Age‐Related Stereotypes from Social Media Texts Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference 2022 p.3183–3194.
61. 10.1177/0963721424126822210.1177/09637214241268222 ↗
62. 10.1177/251524591984720210.1177/2515245919847202 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.chbah.2025.10014510.1016/j.chbah.2025.100145 ↗
64. 10.1108/IJOEM-05-2021-080410.1108/IJOEM-05-2021-0804 ↗
65. 10.1017/S147266962000018310.1017/S1472669620000183 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.10141010.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101410 ↗
67. 10.1007/s00146-022-01427-w10.1007/s00146-022-01427-w ↗
68. 10.1093/scipol/scae05210.1093/scipol/scae052 ↗
69. P.Joshi S.Santy A.Budhiraja K.Bali M.Choudhury The State and Fate of Linguistic Diversity and Inclusion in the NLP World Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2020 p.6282–6293.10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.560 ↗