journal article·2024-08Open access

A Naturally Active Spy Transposon Discovered from the Insect Genome of Colletes gigas as a Promising Novel Gene Transfer Tool

Mohamed Diaby, Han Wu, Bo Gao, Shasha Shi, Bingqing Wang, Saisai Wang, Yali Wang, Zherui Wu, Cai Chen, Xiaoyan Wang, Chengyi Song

Advanced Science· Volume 11· Issue 29

Abstract

Abstract Novel active DNA transposons, such as Spy transposons from the PHIS superfamily, are identified through bioinformatics in this study. The native transposases cgSpy and cvSpy displayed transposition activities of approximately 85% and 35% compared to the hyperactive piggyBac transposase (hyPB). The cgSpy transposon showed unique characteristics, including a lack of overproduction inhibition and reduced efficiency for insertion sizes between 3.1 to 8.5 kb. Integration preferences of cgSpy are found in genes and regulatory regions, making it suitable for genetic manipulation. Evaluation in T‐cell engineering demonstrated that cgSpy‐mediated chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) modification is comparable to the PB system, indicating its potential utility in cell therapy. This study unveils the promising application of the active native transposase, Spy, from Colletes gigas, as a valuable tool for genetic engineering, particularly in T‐cell manipulation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · CRISPR and Genetic Engineering · RNA Interference and Gene Delivery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Animal Science & Technology Yangzhou University Yangzhou Jiangsu 225009 China

School of Basic Medical Sciences Shenzhen University Medical School Shenzhen University Shenzhen Guangdong 518055 China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1146/annurev-ento-070720-07465010.1146/annurev-ento-070720-074650 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10577-017-9570-z10.1007/s10577-017-9570-z ↗
3. 10.1266/ggs.18-0002410.1266/ggs.18-00024 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.03.00910.1016/j.ympev.2015.03.009 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0092-8674(85)80067-210.1016/S0092-8674(85)80067-2 ↗
6. FitzHugh W. · Nature · 2001 · 15 · 860
7. 10.1073/pnas.21144219810.1073/pnas.211442198 ↗
8. 10.1093/gbe/evu14010.1093/gbe/evu140 ↗
9. 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02347-610.1016/S1360-1385(02)02347-6 ↗
10. 10.1534/genetics.110.11667310.1534/genetics.110.116673 ↗
11. 10.1159/00008497910.1159/000084979 ↗
12. 10.1073/pnas.110420810810.1073/pnas.1104208108 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2003.11.00910.1016/j.ymthe.2003.11.009 ↗
14. 10.1101/gad.13.23.307010.1101/gad.13.23.3070 ↗
15. 10.1101/gad.13.23.305910.1101/gad.13.23.3059 ↗
16. 10.1093/emboj/16.10.264610.1093/emboj/16.10.2646 ↗
17. 10.1128/jvi.69.9.5687-5696.199510.1128/jvi.69.9.5687-5696.1995 ↗
18. 10.1074/jbc.M10736520010.1074/jbc.M107365200 ↗
19. 10.1128/JVI.77.6.3838-3845.200310.1128/JVI.77.6.3838-3845.2003 ↗
20. 10.1093/nar/gkac09210.1093/nar/gkac092 ↗
21. 10.1080/07388551.2021.188806710.1080/07388551.2021.1888067 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.tig.2017.07.00610.1016/j.tig.2017.07.006 ↗
23. 10.1186/s13059-018-1577-z10.1186/s13059-018-1577-z ↗
24. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80200-710.1016/S0092-8674(00)80200-7 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41434-021-00254-w10.1038/s41434-021-00254-w ↗
26. 10.1007/s00432-021-03613-710.1007/s00432-021-03613-7 ↗
27. 10.1182/blood.201900292010.1182/blood.2019002920 ↗
28. 10.1093/molbev/msu30010.1093/molbev/msu300 ↗
29. 10.1093/gbe/evx01010.1093/gbe/evx010 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.tig.2017.08.00810.1016/j.tig.2017.08.008 ↗
31. 10.1093/nar/gkab04510.1093/nar/gkab045 ↗
32. 10.1093/nar/gkad00510.1093/nar/gkad005 ↗
33. 10.1038/nmeth.133210.1038/nmeth.1332 ↗
34. 10.1038/mt.2010.4710.1038/mt.2010.47 ↗
35. 10.1186/s13100-015-0043-710.1186/s13100-015-0043-7 ↗
36. 10.1038/mt.2010.4710.1038/mt.2010.47 ↗
37. 10.1073/pnas.100832210810.1073/pnas.1008322108 ↗
38. 10.1002/jgm.48610.1002/jgm.486 ↗
39. 10.1038/ng.34310.1038/ng.343 ↗
40. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.404710.1006/jmbi.2000.4047 ↗
41. 10.1038/mt.2016.1110.1038/mt.2016.11 ↗
42. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a02561510.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025615 ↗
43. 10.1073/pnas.060697910310.1073/pnas.0606979103 ↗
44. 10.1042/BSR2016061410.1042/BSR20160614 ↗
45. 10.1371/journal.pone.004266610.1371/journal.pone.0042666 ↗
46. 10.1073/pnas.112154310910.1073/pnas.1121543109 ↗
47. 10.1038/mt.2010.14110.1038/mt.2010.141 ↗
48. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-47710.1186/1471-2164-10-477 ↗
49. 10.1093/nar/gks64310.1093/nar/gks643 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2003.11.02410.1016/j.ymthe.2003.11.024 ↗
51. Kansagra A. · Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book · 2020 · 40 · 1
52. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.04.00510.1016/j.bbmt.2007.04.005 ↗
53. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.77013210.3389/fimmu.2022.770132 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.01.01210.1016/j.ymthe.2018.01.012 ↗
55. 10.1182/blood-2021-15147710.1182/blood-2021-151477 ↗
56. 10.7554/eLife.5386810.7554/eLife.53868 ↗
57. 10.1093/synbio/ysz01810.1093/synbio/ysz018 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2017.05.00510.1016/j.ygeno.2017.05.005 ↗
59. 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.4.40410.1093/bioinformatics/16.4.404 ↗
60. 10.1093/nar/gky44810.1093/nar/gky448 ↗
61. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw41210.1093/bioinformatics/btw412 ↗
62. 10.1093/molbev/msu30010.1093/molbev/msu300 ↗
63. 10.1038/nmeth.428510.1038/nmeth.4285 ↗
64. Tarailo‐Graovac M. · Curr Protoc Bioinformatics · 2009 · 1
65. 10.1007/BF0173158110.1007/BF01731581 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.omtn.2016.12.00110.1016/j.omtn.2016.12.001 ↗
67. 10.1186/1471-2105-15-18210.1186/1471-2105-15-182 ↗
68. 10.1038/s41587-019-0291-z10.1038/s41587-019-0291-z ↗