journal article·2022-01Open access

Destructive Photon Echo Formation in Six‐Wave Mixing Signals of a MoSe2 Monolayer

Thilo Hahn, Diana Vaclavkova, Miroslav Bartos, Karol Nogajewski, Marek Potemski, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Paweł Machnikowski, Tilmann Kuhn, Jacek Kasprzak, Daniel Wigger

Advanced Science· Volume 9· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Monolayers of transition metal dichalcogenides display a strong excitonic optical response. Additionally encapsulating the monolayer with hexagonal boron nitride allows to reach the limit of a purely homogeneously broadened exciton system. On such a MoSe2‐based system, ultrafast six‐wave mixing spectroscopy is performed and a novel destructive photon echo effect is found. This process manifests as a characteristic depression of the nonlinear signal dynamics when scanning the delay between the applied laser pulses. By theoretically describing the process within a local field model, an excellent agreement with the experiment is reached. An effective Bloch vector representation is developed and thereby it is demonstrated that the destructive photon echo stems from a destructive interference of successive repetitions of the heterodyning experiment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies · Quantum optics and atomic interactions · Photoreceptor and optogenetics research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Solid State Theory University of Münster Münster 48149 Germany

Department of Theoretical Physics Wrocław University of Science and Technology Wrocław 50‐370 Poland

Laboratiore National des Champs Magnétiques Intenses LNCMI‐EMFL CNRS UPR3228, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Toulouse, Univ. Toulouse 3, INSA‐T Grenoble and Toulouse France

Central European Institute of Technology Brno University of Technology Brno Czech 61200 Republic

Institute of Experimental Physics Faculty of Physics University of Warsaw Warszawa 02‐093 Poland

Research Center for Functional Materials National Institute for Materials Science Tsukuba 305‐0044 Japan

International Center for Materials Nanoarchitectonics National Institute for Materials Science Tsukuba 305‐0044 Japan

Université Grenoble Alpes CNRS, Grenoble INP, Institut Néel Grenoble 38000 France

Funding

Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst · College of Natural Resources and Sciences, Humboldt State University · Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej · European Science Foundation

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRev.80.58010.1103/PhysRev.80.580 ↗
2. M. A.Bernstein K. F.King X. J.Zhou Handbook of MRI pulse sequences Elsevier2004.10.1016/B978-012092861-3/50021-2 ↗
3. 10.1103/RevModPhys.71.S44410.1103/RevModPhys.71.S444 ↗
5. 10.1103/RevModPhys.76.32310.1103/RevModPhys.76.323 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.13770110.1103/PhysRevLett.125.137701 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.13770210.1103/PhysRevLett.125.137702 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.56710.1103/PhysRevLett.13.567 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRev.141.39110.1103/PhysRev.141.391 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.163510.1103/PhysRevLett.57.1635 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevA.42.567510.1103/PhysRevA.42.5675 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.134010.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1340 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.186510.1103/PhysRevA.45.1865 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.12130310.1103/PhysRevB.76.121303 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b0070710.1021/acsphotonics.6b00707 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.164710.1103/PhysRevLett.61.1647 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.7710.1103/PhysRevLett.71.77 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.93410.1103/PhysRevLett.66.934 ↗
19. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.21910.1038/nphoton.2014.219 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.04530510.1103/PhysRevB.95.045305 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.01740310.1103/PhysRevLett.95.017403 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.04531310.1103/PhysRevB.87.045313 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.04112410.1103/PhysRevB.96.041124 ↗
24. 10.1038/s42005-020-00491-210.1038/s42005-020-00491-2 ↗
25. 10.1016/0009-2614(95)00362-810.1016/0009-2614(95)00362-8 ↗
26. 10.1146/annurev.physchem.49.1.9910.1146/annurev.physchem.49.1.99 ↗
27. 10.1021/jp991099310.1021/jp9910993 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.46268610.1063/1.462686 ↗
29. 10.1364/OE.16.00463910.1364/OE.16.004639 ↗
30. Langbein W. · Riv. del Nuovo Cim. · 2010 · 33 · 5
31. 10.1038/ncomms931510.1038/ncomms9315 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0106010.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01060 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41467-016-0009-610.1038/s41467-016-0009-6 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0973210.1021/acsnano.8b09732 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.03400110.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.034001 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.306110.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3061 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.200210.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2002 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.15530110.1103/PhysRevB.66.155301 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.12360310.1103/PhysRevLett.99.123603 ↗
40. 10.1364/OL.31.00115110.1364/OL.31.001151 ↗
41. S.Mukamel Principles of Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy 6. Oxford University Press1999.
42. 10.1007/978-3-662-03299-210.1007/978-3-662-03299-2 ↗
43. 10.1088/1367-2630/abdd6c10.1088/1367-2630/abdd6c ↗
44. 10.1515/nanoph-2021-019410.1515/nanoph-2021-0194 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0473310.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04733 ↗
46. 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.02100110.1103/RevModPhys.90.021001 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.272510.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2725 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1473010.1103/PhysRevB.50.14730 ↗
49. Note that the contribution to2ϕ2−ϕ1p3−generated directly by the first and second pulse is of lower order inVand therefore neglected here but considered in the Supporting Information. However it is fully included in the numerical solution.
50. 10.1038/nphoton.2010.28410.1038/nphoton.2010.284 ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.12130410.1103/PhysRevB.93.121304 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.153210.1103/PhysRevB.47.1532 ↗
53. 10.1364/OPTICA.3.00037710.1364/OPTICA.3.000377 ↗