journal article·2017-08Open access

Kinetically Controlled Fabrication of Single‐Crystalline TiO 2 Nanobrush Architectures with High Energy {001} Facets

Lisha Fan, Xiang Gao, Dongkyu Lee, Er‐Jia Guo, Shinbuhm Lee, Paul C. Snijders, Thomas Z. Ward, Gyula Eres, Matthew F. Chisholm, Ho Nyung Lee

Advanced Science· Volume 4· Issue 8

Abstract

This study demonstrates that precise control of nonequilibrium growth conditions during pulsed laser deposition (PLD) can be exploited to produce single‐crystalline anatase TiO 2 nanobrush architectures with large surface areas terminated with high energy {001} facets. The data indicate that the key to nanobrush formation is controlling the atomic surface transport processes to balance defect aggregation and surface‐smoothing processes. High‐resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy data reveal that defect‐mediated aggregation is the key to TiO 2 nanobrush formation. The large concentration of defects present at the intersection of domain boundaries promotes aggregation of PLD growth species, resulting in the growth of the single‐crystalline nanobrush architecture. This study proposes a model for the relationship between defect creation and growth mode in nonequilibrium environments, which enables application of this growth method to novel nanostructure design in a broad range of materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · ZnO doping and properties · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge TN 37831 USA

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20039008710.1002/adma.200390087 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20100467610.1002/adma.201004676 ↗
3. 10.1007/s12274-011-0160-710.1007/s12274-011-0160-7 ↗
4. 10.1038/nature0326110.1038/nature03261 ↗
5. 10.1088/0953-8984/20/26/26400510.1088/0953-8984/20/26/264005 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.20610210.1103/PhysRevLett.117.206102 ↗
7. Pelliccione M. · 2008 · 121
8. 10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00046-010.1016/S0370-1573(99)00046-0 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20120269110.1002/adma.201202691 ↗
10. 10.1038/srep1994110.1038/srep19941 ↗
11. 10.1002/adfm.20070013610.1002/adfm.200700136 ↗
12. 10.1039/c3tc31395f10.1039/c3tc31395f ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20110025110.1002/adfm.201100251 ↗
14. 10.1021/nl049947f10.1021/nl049947f ↗
15. 10.1038/srep1948310.1038/srep19483 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20029001510.1002/adma.200290015 ↗
17. 10.1021/cg800210m10.1021/cg800210m ↗
18. 10.1038/nnano.2009.22610.1038/nnano.2009.226 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.solmat.2006.04.00710.1016/j.solmat.2006.04.007 ↗
20. 10.1002/anie.20110807610.1002/anie.201108076 ↗
21. 10.1021/nl802096a10.1021/nl802096a ↗
22. 10.1021/ja807897210.1021/ja8078972 ↗
23. 10.1021/ja048820p10.1021/ja048820p ↗
24. 10.1021/nl101198b10.1021/nl101198b ↗
25. 10.1039/c3cp53157k10.1039/c3cp53157k ↗
26. 10.1021/am404176q10.1021/am404176q ↗
27. 10.1143/JJAP.48.06FE0210.1143/JJAP.48.06FE02 ↗
28. 10.1039/C5TA09323F10.1039/C5TA09323F ↗
29. 10.1021/jp305026h10.1021/jp305026h ↗
30. 10.1021/jp994365l10.1021/jp994365l ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.15540910.1103/PhysRevB.63.155409 ↗
32. 10.1039/c3nr04655a10.1039/c3nr04655a ↗
33. 10.1021/ja808790p10.1021/ja808790p ↗
34. 10.1021/jz200117r10.1021/jz200117r ↗
35. 10.1039/c0nr00427h10.1039/c0nr00427h ↗
36. 10.1039/c0cc00832j10.1039/c0cc00832j ↗
37. 10.1038/nature0696410.1038/nature06964 ↗
38. 10.1021/cm200597m10.1021/cm200597m ↗
39. 10.3390/catal204057210.3390/catal2040572 ↗
40. 10.1021/nl901181n10.1021/nl901181n ↗
41. 10.1126/science.106995810.1126/science.1069958 ↗
42. 10.1126/science.107285510.1126/science.1072855 ↗
43. 10.1016/B978-075064681-9/50003-110.1016/B978-075064681-9/50003-1 ↗
44. 10.1002/pssb.222160021110.1002/pssb.2221600211 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.140010.1103/PhysRevLett.47.1400 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.182810.1103/PhysRevLett.54.1828 ↗
47. 10.1002/admi.20160103410.1002/admi.201601034 ↗