journal article·2026-02Open access

Cryopreserved Human Otic Neuronal Spheroids Self‐assemble for Functional Connectivity Analysis and Long‐term Ototoxicity Evaluation

Gaoying Sun, Yukai Wang, Man Wang, Xinyue Wang, Mingming Tang, Da Li, Jianhuan Qi, Xue Wang, Shujuan Sun, Lei Chen, Weibin An, Ligang Kong, Anqi Suo, Haibo Wang, Wenwen Liu, Lei Xu

Advanced Science· Volume 13· Issue 7

Abstract

Abstract Spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) in the inner ear are indispensable for auditory function, and their irreversible damage causes permanent sensorineural hearing loss. Although current human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC)‐derived otic lineages offer a valuable resource for SGN regeneration, they face challenges in terms of reproducibility and functional maturation. Here, a robust protocol is established to generate human otic neuronal spheroids (hONS) from cryopreserved hPSC‐derived pre‐placodal ectoderm (PPE) cells. Post‐thaw PPE cells retained high purity and differentiation efficiency comparable to fresh PPE cells. These self‐assembled hONS differentiated into functionally mature SGN‐like neurons, showing specific maker expression, electrophysiological activity, AMPA receptor‐mediated glutamate response, and extensive neurite extension. In tripartite cocultures incorporating murine cochlear explants and human cortical organoids, hONS formed bidirectional functional synaptic connections, validated through live‐cell imaging, optogenetic stimulation, and synaptic immunostaining. Notably, hONS exhibited heightened sensitivity to ototoxic insults. Short‐term cisplatin exposure induced dose‐dependent alterations in cellular and calcium dynamics, whereas prolonged exposure impaired glutamatergic neural functionality and triggered progressive neuronal death. Co‐treatment with sodium thiosulfate attenuated cisplatin‐induced damage. The hONS model also demonstrated concentration‐dependent toxicity to neomycin. Collectively, this hONS model provides a reliable platform for investigating SGN regeneration and conducting preclinical evaluation of ototoxic drug.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics · Pluripotent Stem Cells Research · Photoreceptor and optogenetics research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital Shandong University Jinan 250022 China

Shandong Institute of Otorhinolaryngology Jinan 250022 China

Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology Institute of Zoology Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100101 China

Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Beijing 100101 China

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (76)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1152/physrev.00053.201710.1152/physrev.00053.2017 ↗
2. G. B. D. H. L. Collaborators Lancet2021 397 996.
3. 10.1177/00034894740830030310.1177/000348947408300303 ↗
4. 10.1056/NEJMra161660110.1056/NEJMra1616601 ↗
5. 10.1002/sen2.510.1002/sen2.5 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.00710.1016/j.cell.2018.07.007 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.00810.1016/j.cell.2018.07.008 ↗
8. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-081423-09394210.1146/annurev-neuro-081423-093942 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.heares.2011.03.00210.1016/j.heares.2011.03.002 ↗
10. 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.1010.1038/nrneurol.2016.10 ↗
11. 10.1002/advs.20240267110.1002/advs.202402671 ↗
12. 10.1080/15548627.2021.190546610.1080/15548627.2021.1905466 ↗
13. 10.1089/ars.2017.728810.1089/ars.2017.7288 ↗
14. Wang X. · Biomed Res. Int. · 2019
15. 10.1080/15548627.2019.156992610.1080/15548627.2019.1569926 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.11.00210.1016/j.apsb.2021.11.002 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2023.05.00510.1016/j.ymthe.2023.05.005 ↗
18. 10.1002/sen2.7000410.1002/sen2.70004 ↗
19. Wyatt J. R. · Am J Otol · 1995 · 16 · 52
20. 10.1016/j.heares.2008.06.00510.1016/j.heares.2008.06.005 ↗
21. 10.1038/nature1141510.1038/nature11415 ↗
22. 10.2217/rme.13.3210.2217/rme.13.32 ↗
23. 10.1126/science.124106210.1126/science.1241062 ↗
24. 10.1002/sen2.7001110.1002/sen2.70011 ↗
25. 10.1002/sctm.16-003210.1002/sctm.16-0032 ↗
26. 10.1089/ten.tea.2020.007810.1089/ten.tea.2020.0078 ↗
27. 10.1093/stcltm/szab02310.1093/stcltm/szab023 ↗
28. 10.1038/nbt.384010.1038/nbt.3840 ↗
29. 10.1111/cpr.1343410.1111/cpr.13434 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.stem.2021.01.00510.1016/j.stem.2021.01.005 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.stem.2017.09.01410.1016/j.stem.2017.09.014 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.01.02410.1016/j.stemcr.2017.01.024 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.12.01910.1016/j.stemcr.2016.12.019 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.12.01810.1016/j.stemcr.2016.12.018 ↗
35. 10.1007/978-1-4939-6921-0_1110.1007/978-1-4939-6921-0_11 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.06.01110.1016/j.stemcr.2022.06.011 ↗
37. 10.1038/nrn292410.1038/nrn2924 ↗
38. 10.1007/s00441-014-2102-710.1007/s00441-014-2102-7 ↗
39. 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.08221410.1113/jphysiol.2004.082214 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.11352710.1016/j.celrep.2023.113527 ↗
41. 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-12500810.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-125008 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.11.00210.1016/j.devcel.2004.11.002 ↗
43. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0113-19.201910.1523/JNEUROSCI.0113-19.2019 ↗
44. 10.7554/eLife.0783010.7554/eLife.07830 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.mocell.2025.10019010.1016/j.mocell.2025.100190 ↗
46. 10.1111/ejn.1436010.1111/ejn.14360 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.05.01010.1016/j.stemcr.2018.05.010 ↗
48. 10.1056/NEJMra180617510.1056/NEJMra1806175 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.stem.2020.09.01410.1016/j.stem.2020.09.014 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.stem.2021.08.00210.1016/j.stem.2021.08.002 ↗
51. 10.1002/sen2.7001410.1002/sen2.70014 ↗
52. 10.1038/s41419-018-0967-110.1038/s41419-018-0967-1 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.02010.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.020 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.13453610.1016/j.neulet.2019.134536 ↗
55. 10.1002/cne.1024410.1002/cne.10244 ↗
56. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4552-13.201410.1523/JNEUROSCI.4552-13.2014 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.00410.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.004 ↗
58. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2178-20.202010.1523/JNEUROSCI.2178-20.2020 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.11.02410.1016/j.stemcr.2022.11.024 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.12.01610.1016/j.neuron.2015.12.016 ↗
61. 10.1073/pnas.231153912010.1073/pnas.2311539120 ↗
62. 10.1038/nnano.2012.26510.1038/nnano.2012.265 ↗
63. 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v39.i1.4010.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v39.i1.40 ↗
64. 10.1038/nprot.2014.10010.1038/nprot.2014.100 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.02510.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.025 ↗
66. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0072-22.202310.1523/JNEUROSCI.0072-22.2023 ↗
67. 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012419-03261110.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012419-032611 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.08210.1016/j.cell.2016.05.082 ↗
69. 10.3389/fcell.2021.71015910.3389/fcell.2021.710159 ↗
70. 10.1007/s11427-024-2803-110.1007/s11427-024-2803-1 ↗
71. 10.1006/mthe.2001.033410.1006/mthe.2001.0334 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.molmed.2019.08.00210.1016/j.molmed.2019.08.002 ↗
73. 10.3389/fnins.2022.86703410.3389/fnins.2022.867034 ↗
74. 10.1056/NEJMoa180110910.1056/NEJMoa1801109 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.stem.2018.12.01510.1016/j.stem.2018.12.015 ↗
76. 10.1038/srep0299610.1038/srep02996 ↗