Automated Benchmarking of Variable‐Property Soft Robotic Fingertips to Enable Task‐Optimized Sensor Selection
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Tactile fingertips are a vital component of biological dexterity, where they convey information from the environment through our sensory systems. Similarly, sensorized robotic fingertips are needed to unlock robotic dexterity, versatility, and diverse interactions, which remain significant interdisciplinary challenges. This potential means that hundreds of materials, transducers, and geometries are being developed for soft robotic sensing, but there are very few ways by which they can be compared: a lack of characterizations of the rich interplay between different sensor morphologies, form factors, sensing technologies, material softnesses, and viscosities means that the full solution space is rarely explored. In this work, 15 identically‐shaped robotic fingertips are benchmarked by a fully automated system, covering eight different materials and six broadly‐ranging sensing mechanisms. Diverse mechanical and sensory datasets are collected over a 30 min runtime, designed around five task‐optimized characterization axes. Among these, findings include sensitivities to forces below 0.1 N, ninefold increases in response to human touches, and 0.88 mm localization across a single‐material soft 3D fingertip using electrical impedance tomography. Optimizable tasks are demonstrated via self‐configuration of a two‐finger robotic gripper. The self‐configurable pipeline also enables autonomous adaptability: how robotic manipulators can be optimized over task, environmental, and lifetime timescales is discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence · Soft Robotics and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Bio‐Inspired Robotics Lab Department of Engineering University of Cambridge Cambridge CB2 1PZ UK
CREATE Lab EPFL Lausanne CH‐1015 Switzerland
Soft Materials Laboratory EPFL Lausanne CH‐1015 Switzerland
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Vallbo A. B. · Hum. Neurobiol. · 1984 · 3 · 3
2. 10.1242/dev.12040210.1242/dev.120402 ↗
3. 10.1242/jeb.22728010.1242/jeb.227280 ↗
4. Han H.‐Y. · 1999 · 800
5. 10.1113/JP28527110.1113/JP285271 ↗
6. 10.1098/rsos.17032110.1098/rsos.170321 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.02.01510.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.02.015 ↗
8. 10.1111/joa.1232710.1111/joa.12327 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.adu295010.1126/science.adu2950 ↗
10. 10.1126/scirobotics.adl062810.1126/scirobotics.adl0628 ↗
11. 10.1177/02783649960150040210.1177/027836499601500402 ↗
12. 10.1109/LRA.2020.297725710.1109/LRA.2020.2977257 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.robot.2005.09.01910.1016/j.robot.2005.09.019 ↗
14. 10.1002/aisy.20230004210.1002/aisy.202300042 ↗
15. 10.1109/LRA.2017.273496510.1109/LRA.2017.2734965 ↗
16. M.Lambeta T.Wu A.Sengul V. R.Most N.Black K.Sawyer R.Mercado H.Qi A.Sohn B.Taylor N.Tydingco G.Kammerer D.Stroud J.Khatha K.Jenkins K.Most N.Stein R.Chavira T.Craven‐Bartle E.Sanchez Y.Ding J.Malik R.Calandra arXiv:2411.024792024.
17. R.Bhirangi V.Pattabiraman E.Erciyes Y.Cao T.Hellebrekers L.Pinto arXiv:2409.082762024.
18. 10.1109/LRA.2022.316059010.1109/LRA.2022.3160590 ↗
19. 10.1002/adfm.20250063310.1002/adfm.202500633 ↗
20. 10.1007/s40820-023-01216-010.1007/s40820-023-01216-0 ↗
21. 10.1109/LRA.2019.295366310.1109/LRA.2019.2953663 ↗
22. Greenland B. G. · 2024 · 1
23. 10.1002/advs.20230159010.1002/advs.202301590 ↗
24. 10.1002/aisy.20220011510.1002/aisy.202200115 ↗
25. 10.1109/LRA.2023.324175710.1109/LRA.2023.3241757 ↗
26. 10.1007/s10846-018-0902-910.1007/s10846-018-0902-9 ↗
27. 10.1145/3414685.341783110.1145/3414685.3417831 ↗
28. Kim J. · 2024 · 5226
29. Liu S. Q. · 2024 · 691
30. Hou J. · Appl. Sci. · 2024 · 14 · 6
31. Sathe P. · 2023 · 10813
32. 10.1002/advs.20220321710.1002/advs.202203217 ↗
33. 10.1109/LRA.2023.323688310.1109/LRA.2023.3236883 ↗
34. Onal C. D. · 2012 · 1038
35. 10.1002/aisy.20190016610.1002/aisy.201900166 ↗
36. Kristanto H. · 2019 · 1
37. Schmitz A. · 2010 · 2212
38. 10.1016/j.bios.2018.08.01810.1016/j.bios.2018.08.018 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41563-020-0699-310.1038/s41563-020-0699-3 ↗
40. 10.1038/s41427-022-00357-910.1038/s41427-022-00357-9 ↗
41. 10.1039/C7GC00347A10.1039/C7GC00347A ↗
42. 10.1016/j.molliq.2023.12167610.1016/j.molliq.2023.121676 ↗
43. 10.1186/s12302-018-0132-610.1186/s12302-018-0132-6 ↗
44. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0667610.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06676 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.molliq.2024.12433210.1016/j.molliq.2024.124332 ↗
46. 10.1126/scirobotics.adq230310.1126/scirobotics.adq2303 ↗
47. 10.1109/LRA.2021.307260010.1109/LRA.2021.3072600 ↗
48. Pan C. · 2024 · 7598
49. 10.1007/s11370-019-00292-910.1007/s11370-019-00292-9 ↗
50. Zhang Y. · 2017 · 1
51. 10.1002/adma.20200441310.1002/adma.202004413 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.mtelec.2023.10003210.1016/j.mtelec.2023.100032 ↗
53. 10.1145/3414685.341779010.1145/3414685.3417790 ↗
54. 10.1145/3472749.347475810.1145/3472749.3474758 ↗
55. 10.1109/LRA.2025.355729710.1109/LRA.2025.3557297 ↗
56. 10.1038/s43246-025-00839-710.1038/s43246-025-00839-7 ↗