journal article·2025-09Open access

Prediction of Microstructural Representativity From A Single Image

Amir Dahari, Ronan Docherty, Steve Kench, Samuel J. Cooper

Advanced Science· Volume 12· Issue 34

Abstract

Abstract In this study, a method is presented for predicting the representativity of the phase fraction observed in a single image (2D or 3D) of a material. Traditional approaches often require large datasets and extensive statistical analysis to estimate the Integral Range, a key factor in determining the variance of microstructural properties. The method leverages the Two‐Point Correlation function to directly estimate the variance from a single image, thereby enabling phase fraction prediction with associated confidence levels. The approach is validated using open‐source datasets, demonstrating its efficacy across diverse microstructures. This technique significantly reduces the data requirements for representativity analysis, providing a practical tool for material scientists and engineers working with limited microstructural data. To make the method easily accessible, a web‐application has been created, https://www.imagerep.io , for quick, simple and informative use of the method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Dyson School of Design Engineering Imperial College London London SW7 2DB England

Department of Materials Imperial College London London SW7 2AZ England

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41597-022-01744-110.1038/s41597-022-01744-1 ↗
2. Metheron G. · Cah. Centre Morphol. Math. · 1971 · 5 · 211
3. 10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00143-410.1016/S0020-7683(03)00143-4 ↗
4. Matheron G. · 2012
5. 10.1002/978352762830810.1002/9783527628308 ↗
6. Chiu S. N. · 2013 · 218
7. 10.1007/978-3-030-75452-510.1007/978-3-030-75452-5 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.03.02510.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.03.025 ↗
9. 10.1149/2.0811606jes10.1149/2.0811606jes ↗
10. 10.21105/joss.0129610.21105/joss.01296 ↗
11. For simplicity the phase fraction of Figure 1(a) is regarded as the material's phase fraction although the image has its own uncertainty since it is still a small sample from the material. According to our method the image phase fraction deviates by at most 0.81% from the true material's phase fraction with 95% confidence.
12. 10.1016/0022-5096(96)00007-510.1016/0022-5096(96)00007-5 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.02.06810.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.02.068 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.10.01110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.10.011 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.10.02410.1016/j.commatsci.2010.10.024 ↗
16. 10.1149/2.074206jes10.1149/2.074206jes ↗
17. 10.1149/2.1221908jes10.1149/2.1221908jes ↗
18. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2020.10418110.1016/j.euromechsol.2020.104181 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cma.2005.07.02210.1016/j.cma.2005.07.022 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.47341410.1063/1.473414 ↗
21. B. L.Adams S. R.Kalidindi D. T.Fullwood Microstructure Sensitive Design Perform. Optim. Butterworth‐Heinemann Oxford2012.
22. 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.11792710.1016/j.actamat.2022.117927 ↗
23. R.Hill InMath. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. vol.95 Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge1984 pp.481–494.10.1017/S0305004100061818 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2004.12.00210.1016/j.ijengsci.2004.12.002 ↗
25. Barber Z. · J. Mater. Educ. · 2007 · 29 · 7
26. 10.1038/s42256-021-00322-110.1038/s42256-021-00322-1 ↗
27. 10.1039/D2DD00120A10.1039/D2DD00120A ↗
28. R.Docherty I.Squires A.Vamvakeros S. J.Cooper arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.041972023.
29. 10.1149/2.0731814jes10.1149/2.0731814jes ↗
30. 10.5334/jors.30910.5334/jors.309 ↗
31. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab905010.1149/1945-7111/ab9050 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41467-020-15811-x10.1038/s41467-020-15811-x ↗
33. M.Shachar J.Garay arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.015422023.
34. 10.1007/s11242-022-01852-x10.1007/s11242-022-01852-x ↗