Regional Stiffness and Hardening Indices: New Indicators Derived from Multidimensional Dynamic CTA for Aneurysm Risk Assessment
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Two indices, indicating the regional average stiffness and the pace of strain hardening respectively, are derived from the nonlinear stress–strain behavior obtained from biomechanical analysis of aneurysm. A comprehensive method based on electrocardiographic‐gated multidimensional dynamic computed tomography angiography (MD CTA) is developed for extracting these mechanical characteristics in vivo. The proposed indices are evaluated by 26 cases including 9 healthy, one aortosclerosis, and 16 abdominal aortic aneurysm cases. The difference of SSI and dSSI value between aneurysmal and healthy groups is up to orders in magnitude. Significant correlation of these indices with the clinical indicator of aneurysm diameter is found. Logistic models based on these indices are capable to sharply discriminate the healthy and the aneurysmal arteries with AUC>0.98. This work introduces new tools and new indices for aortic mechanical assessment which may shed light on understanding the mechanical condition, pathological state and eventually benefit clinical decision‐making.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aortic aneurysm repair treatments · Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches · Elasticity and Material Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Technology Boea Wisdom (Hangzhou) Network Technology Co., Ltd. Hangzhou 310000 China
Department of Vascular Surgery Union Hospital Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan 43022 China
Department of Radiology Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging Union Hospital Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan 43022 China
Department of Mechanical Engineering The University of Iowa Iowa City 52242 USA
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/cnm.355410.1002/cnm.3554 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.02.04610.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.02.046 ↗
3. 10.1115/1.404307510.1115/1.4043075 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10439-017-1915-410.1007/s10439-017-1915-4 ↗
5. 10.1115/1.289883010.1115/1.2898830 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0022-3697(99)00252-810.1016/S0022-3697(99)00252-8 ↗
7. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb33330.x10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb33330.x ↗
8. 10.1016/0741-5214(94)90169-410.1016/0741-5214(94)90169-4 ↗
9. Sumner D. S. · Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. · 1970 · 130 · 459
10. 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.06.03410.1016/j.actbio.2022.06.034 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10237-020-01410-810.1007/s10237-020-01410-8 ↗
12. 10.3390/ijms2119725010.3390/ijms21197250 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jvscit.2020.01.01410.1016/j.jvscit.2020.01.014 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10237-018-1073-010.1007/s10237-018-1073-0 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.11110610.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111106 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10439-019-02204-510.1007/s10439-019-02204-5 ↗
17. 10.1093/ejcts/ezac39210.1093/ejcts/ezac392 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41598-023-36204-210.1038/s41598-023-36204-2 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00330-023-09488-110.1007/s00330-023-09488-1 ↗
20. 10.1098/rsif.2015.085210.1098/rsif.2015.0852 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10237-023-01759-610.1007/s10237-023-01759-6 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.12.01210.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.12.012 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10554-013-0307-610.1007/s10554-013-0307-6 ↗
24. E.Schwartz R.Gottardi J.Holfeld C.Loewe M.Czerny G.Langs inProceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro IEEE Piscataway NJ2010.
25. 10.3390/oxygen204003410.3390/oxygen2040034 ↗
26. 10.1007/s10439-015-1354-z10.1007/s10439-015-1354-z ↗
27. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.03.00510.1016/j.medengphy.2011.03.005 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10439-009-9837-410.1007/s10439-009-9837-4 ↗
29. 10.1067/mva.2001.11481310.1067/mva.2001.114813 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.11032110.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110321 ↗
31. 10.1186/s12872-018-0818-010.1186/s12872-018-0818-0 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.01610.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.016 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cma.2016.05.01710.1016/j.cma.2016.05.017 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.03610.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.036 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.03.02510.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.03.025 ↗
36. 10.1007/s10237-014-0646-910.1007/s10237-014-0646-9 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10439-013-0751-410.1007/s10439-013-0751-4 ↗
38. 10.1007/s10237-007-0110-110.1007/s10237-007-0110-1 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.09.02910.1016/j.actbio.2021.09.029 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.06.02710.1016/j.ejvs.2020.06.027 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.05810.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.058 ↗
42. 10.1007/s00213-005-0147-810.1007/s00213-005-0147-8 ↗
43. 10.1098/rsif.2012.009710.1098/rsif.2012.0097 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jvssci.2021.08.00310.1016/j.jvssci.2021.08.003 ↗
45. 10.1017/S143192762200062910.1017/S1431927622000629 ↗
46. 10.1080/10255842.2010.52218610.1080/10255842.2010.522186 ↗
47. 10.1002/cnm.297710.1002/cnm.2977 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.10428410.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104284 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.10650810.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106508 ↗
50. 10.3390/app1108348510.3390/app11083485 ↗
51. 10.1109/TBME.1985.32553210.1109/TBME.1985.325532 ↗
52. T.Vercauteren X.Pennec E.Malis A.Perchant N.Ayache inProceedings of Biennial Int. Conf. on Information Processing in Medical Imaging Springer New York2007.
53. 10.1088/0031-9155/46/3/20110.1088/0031-9155/46/3/201 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.media.2007.06.00410.1016/j.media.2007.06.004 ↗
55. 10.1111/1467-8659.0033410.1111/1467-8659.00334 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.01.01510.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.01.015 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.01.01310.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.01.013 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.07.02910.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.07.029 ↗
59. 10.1080/0309190011005780610.1080/03091900110057806 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.carpath.2008.01.00110.1016/j.carpath.2008.01.001 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.03.00210.1016/j.medengphy.2008.03.002 ↗
62. 10.1201/978142007577910.1201/9781420075779 ↗
63. Cramer J. S. · SSRN Electron J. · 2002 · 119 · 1