Beyond the Non‐Hermitian Skin Effect: Scaling‐Controlled Topology from Exceptional‐Bound Bands
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT We establish a novel mechanism for topological transitions in non‐Hermitian systems that are controlled by the system size. Based on a new paradigm known as exceptional‐bound (EB) band engineering, its mechanism hinges on the unique critical scaling behavior near an exceptional point, totally unrelated to the well‐known non‐Hermitian skin effect. Through a series of ansatz models, we analytically derive and numerically demonstrate how topological transitions depend on the system size with increasingly sophisticated topological phase boundaries. Our approach can be generically applied to design scaling‐dependent bands in multi‐dimensional lattices, gapped or gapless, challenging established critical and entanglement behavior. It can be experimentally demonstrated in any non‐Hermitian platform with versatile couplings or multi‐orbital unit cells, such as photonic crystals, as well as classical and quantum circuits. The identification of this new EB band mechanism provides new design principles for engineering band structures through scaling‐dependent phenomena unique to non‐Hermitian systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics · Topological Materials and Phenomena · Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore
References (79)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.24514510.1103/PhysRevB.102.245145 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.02100710.1103/PhysRevX.13.021007 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41467-020-18917-410.1038/s41467-020-18917-4 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.04316710.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043167 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.15543010.1103/PhysRevB.107.155430 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.04310810.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.043108 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.13660210.1103/PhysRevLett.133.136602 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.16511710.1103/PhysRevB.104.165117 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.01680510.1103/PhysRevLett.123.016805 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.20110310.1103/PhysRevB.99.201103 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.13390310.1103/PhysRevLett.116.133903 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.23760110.1103/PhysRevLett.122.237601 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.08680110.1103/PhysRevLett.124.086801 ↗
14. M.YangandC. H.Lee “Reversing Non‐Hermitian Skin Accumulation With a Non‐Local Transverse Switch ”Preprint arXiv (September 2 2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.02686.
15. 10.1038/s42005-025-02274-z10.1038/s42005-025-02274-z ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.08680310.1103/PhysRevLett.121.086803 ↗
17. S.Liu H.Jiang W.‐T.Xue et al. “Non‐Hermitian Entanglement Dip From Scaling‐Induced Exceptional Criticality ”Preprint arXiv (August 15 2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2025.07.011.10.1016/j.scib.2025.07.011 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.10420310.1103/PhysRevB.104.104203 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.11680110.1103/PhysRevLett.127.116801 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.01324310.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.013243 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.07515810.1103/PhysRevB.106.075158 ↗
22. M.YangandC. H.Lee “Beyond Symmetry Protection: Robust Feedback‐Enforced Edge States in Non‐Hermitian Stacked Quantum Spin Hall Systems ”Preprint arXiv (July 23 2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.17295.
23. 10.1038/nature2328110.1038/nature23281 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.78710.1103/PhysRevLett.86.787 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.01390110.1103/PhysRevLett.120.013901 ↗
26. 10.1088/1751-8113/45/44/44401610.1088/1751-8113/45/44/444016 ↗
27. 10.1088/0305-4470/37/6/03410.1088/0305-4470/37/6/034 ↗
28. 10.1038/nature2328010.1038/nature23280 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41565-023-01408-010.1038/s41565-023-01408-0 ↗
30. 10.1063/5.018382610.1063/5.0183826 ↗
31. 10.1126/science.aar770910.1126/science.aar7709 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41563-019-0304-910.1038/s41563-019-0304-9 ↗
33. 10.1038/ncomms1111010.1038/ncomms11110 ↗
34. 10.1063/5.020034810.1063/5.0200348 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.L12111510.1103/PhysRevB.105.L121115 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.20515310.1103/PhysRevB.107.205153 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.17050310.1103/PhysRevLett.126.170503 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.01040210.1103/PhysRevLett.128.010402 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.02430610.1103/PhysRevB.109.024306 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.02430310.1103/PhysRevB.105.024303 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.L02040310.1103/PhysRevB.107.L020403 ↗
42. W.‐T.XueandC. H.Lee “Topologically Protected Negative Entanglement ”Preprint arXiv 2024 arXiv:2403.03259.10.1002/advs.202513868 ↗
43. 10.1093/nsr/nwae27810.1093/nsr/nwae278 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41467-024-53434-810.1038/s41467-024-53434-8 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.08542810.1103/PhysRevB.103.085428 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.01307810.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013078 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.08511910.1103/PhysRevB.91.085119 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.scib.2024.05.03610.1016/j.scib.2024.05.036 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.13050210.1103/PhysRevLett.104.130502 ↗
50. 10.1088/1742-5468/2014/10/P1003010.1088/1742-5468/2014/10/P10030 ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.24513210.1103/PhysRevB.83.245132 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.19640210.1103/PhysRevLett.108.196402 ↗
53. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.18050210.1103/PhysRevLett.104.180502 ↗
54. 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.135510.1103/RevModPhys.80.1355 ↗
55. 10.1088/0034-4885/56/12/00110.1088/0034-4885/56/12/001 ↗
56. 10.1088/1751-8113/47/3/03530510.1088/1751-8113/47/3/035305 ↗
57. 10.1002/advs.20250804710.1002/advs.202508047 ↗
58. H.Meng Y. S.Ang andC. H.Lee “Generalized Brillouin Zone Fragmentation ”Preprint arXiv (August 18 2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.13275.
59. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.17040110.1103/PhysRevLett.123.170401 ↗
60. 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.L22030110.1103/PhysRevB.107.L220301 ↗
61. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.22640210.1103/PhysRevLett.125.226402 ↗
62. 10.1073/pnas.201058011710.1073/pnas.2010580117 ↗
63. 10.1038/s41567-020-0922-910.1038/s41567-020-0922-9 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.11360110.1103/PhysRevLett.129.113601 ↗
65. 10.1002/advs.20220292210.1002/advs.202202922 ↗
66. 10.1038/s41586‐022‐04929‐110.1038/s41586‐022‐04929‐1 ↗
67. 10.1126/science.aaz872710.1126/science.aaz8727 ↗
68. 10.1038/s41567-020-0836-610.1038/s41567-020-0836-6 ↗
69. 10.1038/s41467-021-26619-810.1038/s41467-021-26619-8 ↗
70. 10.1038/s41467-025-61372-210.1038/s41467-025-61372-2 ↗
71. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.07040110.1103/PhysRevLett.129.070401 ↗
72. 10.1038/s41467-025-56882-y10.1038/s41467-025-56882-y ↗
73. 10.1038/s41534-022-00629-w10.1038/s41534-022-00629-w ↗
74. 10.21468/SciPostPhys.16.1.00210.21468/SciPostPhys.16.1.002 ↗
75. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.26060310.1103/PhysRevLett.133.260603 ↗
76. J. M.Koh W.‐T.Xue T.Tai D. E.Koh andC. H.Lee “Interacting Non‐Hermitian Edge and Cluster Bursts on a Digital Quantum Processor ”Preprint arXiv (March 18 2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.14595.
77. 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.13431210.1103/PhysRevB.106.134312 ↗
78. 10.1142/S021974990500145610.1142/S0219749905001456 ↗
79. 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.L22020510.1103/PhysRevB.107.L220205 ↗