Cation Substitution in High‐Entropy Layered Double Hydroxide Driving D‐Band Center Tuning for Oxygen Evolution Reaction
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The development of electrocatalysts with optimized intermediate adsorption and low energy barriers is crucial for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). In this work, the d‐band center position of high‐entropy layered double hydroxides (HE‐LDHs) is modulated by substituting Mg 2 ⁺ sites with Fe 2+ , Cu 2+ , Co 2+ , and Ni 2+ . It is demonstrated that the d‐band center position relative to the Fermi level is modified, reaching an optimal energy in (FeCuCoNi) 6 Al 2 ‐LDH. The nature of the incorporated transition metals significantly influenced OH − adsorption kinetics and reduced the overpotential for OER by 55%, compared to native LDH. The stepwise substitution of Mg 2 ⁺ by Fe 2 ⁺ particularly induces charge carrier transfer, switching into Faradaic processes favorable to the enhancement of OER kinetics. This work provides an effective approach that allows decreasing the OER overpotential through adjusting the position of the d‐band center, and suggests that d‐band tuning via multication insertion can directly shift the material toward an optimal binding strength region, which underlies the observed performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Université Paris‐Saclay, CNRS UMR 8000 Institut de Chimie Physique Orsay 91400 France
National Energy Key Laboratory for New Hydrogen‐Ammonia Energy Technologies Foshan Xianhu Laboratory Foshan China
Université Paris‐Saclay, UMR 8182 CNRS Institut de Chimie Moléculaire et des Matériaux d'Orsay (ICMMO) Orsay 91405 France
Funding
Chinese Government Scholarship
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.25710.1016/j.msea.2003.10.257 ↗
2. 10.1038/ncomms948510.1038/ncomms9485 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13865910.1016/j.cej.2022.138659 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41563-020-00816-010.1038/s41563-020-00816-0 ↗
5. 10.3139/146.11187410.3139/146.111874 ↗
6. 10.1002/smtd.20220113810.1002/smtd.202201138 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13344810.1016/j.cej.2021.133448 ↗
8. 10.1002/idm2.1211010.1002/idm2.12110 ↗
9. 10.1002/idm2.1205810.1002/idm2.12058 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cjche.2022.02.01010.1016/j.cjche.2022.02.010 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.decarb.2024.10006210.1016/j.decarb.2024.100062 ↗
12. 10.1002/idm2.1216910.1002/idm2.12169 ↗
13. 10.1038/376238a010.1038/376238a0 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.214110.1103/PhysRevLett.76.2141 ↗
15. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0127310.1021/acscatal.0c01273 ↗
16. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0110410.1021/acscatal.0c01104 ↗
17. 10.1021/acscatal.1c0186810.1021/acscatal.1c01868 ↗
18. 10.1021/ja307951y10.1021/ja307951y ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20050438610.1002/anie.200504386 ↗
20. 10.1002/chem.20240272510.1002/chem.202402725 ↗
21. 10.1002/smll.20240796410.1002/smll.202407964 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.10070210.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100702 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41467-023-41706-810.1038/s41467-023-41706-8 ↗
24. 10.1039/d5cc01284h10.1039/d5cc01284h ↗
25. 10.1346/CCMN.1975.023050810.1346/CCMN.1975.0230508 ↗
26. 10.1346/CCMN.1983.031040910.1346/CCMN.1983.0310409 ↗
27. 10.1021/ic00108a02010.1021/ic00108a020 ↗
28. 10.1107/S002188987801284410.1107/S0021889878012844 ↗
29. Delhez R. · J. Anal. Chem. · 1982 · 312 · 1
30. 10.1016/j.clay.2016.03.02910.1016/j.clay.2016.03.029 ↗
31. 10.1007/s10971-018-4903-810.1007/s10971-018-4903-8 ↗
32. Lemmon E. W. · Nist chemistry webbook. NIST standard reference database · 2011 · 69
33. 10.1016/j.clay.2017.10.01310.1016/j.clay.2017.10.013 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.10667410.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106674 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.12.03810.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.12.038 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.11910.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.119 ↗
37. 10.1002/smll.20240221110.1002/smll.202402211 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.01.11110.1016/j.matlet.2018.01.111 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.07010.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.070 ↗
40. 10.1002/smll.20190255110.1002/smll.201902551 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.16414710.1016/j.apsusc.2025.164147 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jtice.2016.12.03010.1016/j.jtice.2016.12.030 ↗
43. Bredar A. R. · Oxygen reduction electrocatalysis with epitaxially grown spinel MnFe · 2022 · 12 · 3577
44. Greenwood N. · 1997
45. Cotton F. A. · 1999
46. housecroft C. E. · Vib. Spectrosc. · 2012 · 71 · 7
47. 10.1039/C4CS00160E10.1039/C4CS00160E ↗
48. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0044210.1021/acsenergylett.3c00442 ↗
49. 10.1039/C9CP03541A10.1039/C9CP03541A ↗
50. 10.1149/2.015303jes10.1149/2.015303jes ↗
51. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10465310.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104653 ↗
52. 10.1126/science.aam709210.1126/science.aam7092 ↗
53. 10.1002/smll.20160338710.1002/smll.201603387 ↗
54. 10.1017/CBO978051152489910.1017/CBO9780511524899 ↗