Smart Health Evaluation for Lithium‐Ion Battery With Super‐Short‐Segment Charging
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Accurate state of health estimation is crucial for the reliable operation of lithium‐ion batteries in electric vehicles. The charging curve contains valuable features for health evaluation, but real‐world charging often lacks sufficient data due to the users’ early recharging habits. A smart method is proposed for accurate battery health estimation using super‐short charging segments. This method combines a degradation mechanism‐guided Scale‐Invariant Feature Transform for smart health feature identification with machine learning for health evaluation. Validation with 87 batteries with various chemistries, formats, and capacities from 6 manufacturers demonstrates its efficacy. Regardless of battery specifications, health features can be identified automatically from the charging data. The method promises high accuracy (estimation error as low as 1.97%) even with super‐short charging covering 10% state of charge span, where all the existing health feature extraction approaches fail. This method provides new avenues for battery health evaluation in uncertain real‐world electric vehicle applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Engineering Research Centre for Electric Vehicles, School of Mechanical Engineering Beijing Institute of Technology Beijing 100081 China
Department of Electrical Engineering Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg SE‐41296 Sweden
School of Electrical Engineering and Robotics Queensland University of Technology Brisbane 4000 Australia
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/advs.20230249610.1002/advs.202302496 ↗
2. 10.1002/advs.20241031810.1002/advs.202410318 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.09.03010.1016/j.apenergy.2012.09.030 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00190-810.1016/S0378-7753(02)00190-8 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.11.01810.1016/j.joule.2019.11.018 ↗
6. 10.1002/advs.20240260810.1002/advs.202402608 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.est.2022.10506210.1016/j.est.2022.105062 ↗
8. 10.1109/TVT.2019.292712010.1109/TVT.2019.2927120 ↗
9. 10.1038/s42256-021-00312-310.1038/s42256-021-00312-3 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.11734610.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117346 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.est.2021.10385710.1016/j.est.2021.103857 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.energy.2020.11785210.1016/j.energy.2020.117852 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.11507410.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115074 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.02310.1016/j.energy.2018.03.023 ↗
15. 10.1109/TTE.2020.299454310.1109/TTE.2020.2994543 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.01810.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.018 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.01.05110.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.01.051 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.energy.2023.12910310.1016/j.energy.2023.129103 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.11401910.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114019 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41598-020-66424-910.1038/s41598-020-66424-9 ↗
21. 10.1109/TPEL.2022.314450410.1109/TPEL.2022.3144504 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.11589510.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115895 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.10.09210.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.10.092 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.12610.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.126 ↗
25. Pistoia G. · 2010
26. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.01610.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.016 ↗
27. 10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.9410.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94 ↗