journal article·2024-12Open access

Conjugation of Polycationic Peptides Extends the Efficacy Spectrum of β‐Lactam Antibiotics

Julia Werner, Florian Umstätter, Manuel B. Böhmann, Hannah Müller, Barbro Beijer, Tobias Hertlein, Laura Kaschnitz, Veronika Bram, Christian Kleist, Karel D. Klika, Eric Mühlberg, Gabriel Braune, Sabrina Wohlfart, Martin Gärtner, Silke Peter, Stefan Zimmermann, Uwe Haberkorn, Knut Ohlsen, Heike Brötz‐Oesterhelt, Walter Mier, Philipp Uhl

Advanced Science· Volume 11· Issue 48

Abstract

Abstract Antibiotic‐resistant enterococci represent a significant global health challenge. Unfortunately, most β‐lactam antibiotics are not applicable for enterococcal infections due to intrinsic resistance. To extend their antimicrobial spectrum, polycationic peptides are conjugated to examples from each of the four classes of β‐lactam antibiotics. Remarkably, the β‐lactam–peptide conjugates gained an up to 1000‐fold increase in antimicrobial activity against vancomycin‐susceptible and vancomycin‐resistant enterococci. Even against β‐lactam‐resistant Gram‐negative strains, the conjugates are found to be effective despite their size exceeding the exclusion volume of porins. The extraordinary gain of activity can be explained by an altered mode of killing. Of note, the conjugates showed a concentration‐dependent activity in contrast to the parent β‐lactam antibiotics that exhibited a time‐dependent mode of action. In comparison to the parent β‐lactams, the conjugates showed altered affinities to the penicillin‐binding proteins. Furthermore, it is found that peptide conjugation also resulted in a different elimination route of the compounds when administered to rodents. In mice systemically infected with vancomycin‐resistant enterococci, treatment with a β‐lactam–peptide conjugate reduced bacterial burden in the liver compared to its originator. Therefore, peptide modification of β–lactam antibiotics represents a promising platform strategy to broaden their efficacy spectrum, particularly against enterococci.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria · Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy · Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Nuclear Medicine Heidelberg University Hospital 69120 Heidelberg Germany

Department of Pharmaceutical Technology Institute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology Heidelberg University 69120 Heidelberg Germany

Microbial Bioactive Compounds Interfaculty Institute of Microbiology and Infection Medicine University of Tübingen 72076 Tübingen Germany

Institute of Molecular Infection Biology University of Würzburg 97080 Würzburg Germany

NMR Spectroscopy Analysis Unit German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) 69120 Heidelberg Germany

Department of Pharmaceutical and Bioorganic Chemistry Institute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology Heidelberg University 69120 Heidelberg Germany

Medical Microbiology Interfaculty Institute of Microbiology and Infection Medicine University of Tübingen 72076 Tübingen Germany

Department of Infectious Diseases Medical Microbiology and Hygiene Heidelberg University Hospital 69120 Heidelberg Germany

Funding

Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.4161/viru.2128210.4161/viru.21282 ↗
2. 10.1586/14787210.2014.95609210.1586/14787210.2014.956092 ↗
3. C. J.Kristich L. B.Rice C. A.Arias in Enterococci; From Commensals to Leading Causes of Drug Resistant Infection (Eds.:M. S.Gilmore D. B.Clewell Y.Ike N.Shankar) Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Boston2014.
4. 10.1093/cid/ciy06410.1093/cid/ciy064 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.10.01710.1016/j.jiph.2022.10.017 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c0000110.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00001 ↗
7. 10.1146/annurev.bi.52.070183.00414110.1146/annurev.bi.52.070183.004141 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.11282910.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112829 ↗
9. Neu H. C. · Am. J. Med. · 1985 · 79 · 2
10. 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2009.02563.x10.1111/j.1600-0463.2009.02563.x ↗
11. 10.1128/AAC.38.9.198010.1128/AAC.38.9.1980 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0196363310.1007/BF01963633 ↗
13. 10.1074/jbc.RA118.00605210.1074/jbc.RA118.006052 ↗
14. 10.1128/AAC.02273-1910.1128/AAC.02273-19 ↗
15. 10.1128/mBio.00199-1110.1128/mBio.00199-11 ↗
16. 10.1093/jac/dkp50310.1093/jac/dkp503 ↗
17. Kisgen J. · P T · 2008 · 33 · 631
18. 10.2165/00128071-200809040-0000410.2165/00128071-200809040-00004 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.11231210.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112312 ↗
20. 10.1007/s11908-020-0710-910.1007/s11908-020-0710-9 ↗
21. 10.3390/ijms2202061710.3390/ijms22020617 ↗
22. 10.1177/106002802092998810.1177/1060028020929988 ↗
23. 10.1002/pep2.2405910.1002/pep2.24059 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsinfecdis.2c0040610.1021/acsinfecdis.2c00406 ↗
25. 10.1002/anie.20200272710.1002/anie.202002727 ↗
26. EUCAST EUCAST System for Antimicrobial Abbreviations2018.
27. EUCAST Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. In Version 14.02024.
28. 10.1128/CMR.00115-2010.1128/CMR.00115-20 ↗
29. CLSI Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing – M100. In 30th Edition2020.
30. 10.1046/j.1198-743x.2001.00295.x10.1046/j.1198-743x.2001.00295.x ↗
31. 10.1021/jp405418y10.1021/jp405418y ↗
32. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.06.00210.1016/j.bbamem.2017.06.002 ↗
33. Gagetti P. · Rev. Argent. Microbiol. · 2019 · 51 · 179
34. 10.1093/jac/dkw23110.1093/jac/dkw231 ↗
35. 10.1128/AAC.36.5.112510.1128/AAC.36.5.1125 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0121310.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01213 ↗
37. 10.1128/AAC.35.4.77610.1128/AAC.35.4.776 ↗
38. 10.1128/AAC.38.4.82410.1128/AAC.38.4.824 ↗
39. 10.1128/AAC.35.1.9210.1128/AAC.35.1.92 ↗
40. 10.3390/antibiotics1107088910.3390/antibiotics11070889 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.mex.2021.10154310.1016/j.mex.2021.101543 ↗
42. 10.3390/molecules2416296810.3390/molecules24162968 ↗
43. 10.1128/AAC.01152-0710.1128/AAC.01152-07 ↗
44. Jones A. K. · Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. · 2018 · 62
45. 10.1016/S0196-9781(02)00192-410.1016/S0196-9781(02)00192-4 ↗