A Pneumatic Flexible Linear Actuator Inspired by Snake Swallowing
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Soft robots spark a revolution in human–machine interaction. However, developing high‐performance soft actuators remains challenging due to trade‐offs among output force, driving distance, control precision, safety, and compliance. Here, addressing the lack of long‐distance, high‐precision flexible linear actuators, an innovative pneumatic flexible linear actuator (PFLA) is introduced, inspired by the smooth and controlled process observed in snakes ingesting sizable food, such as eggs. This PFLA combines a soft tube, emulating the snake's body cavity, with a pneumatically driven piston. Through the joint modulation of moving resistance and driving force by pneumatic pressure, the PFLA exhibits exceptional motion control capabilities, including self‐holding without pressure supply, smooth low‐speed motion (down to 0.004 m s–1), high‐speed motion (up to 5.6 m s–1) with low air pressure demand, and a self‐protection mechanism. Highlighting its adaptability and versatility, the PFLA finds applications in various settings, including a wearable assistive devices, a manipulator capable of precise path tracking and positioning, and rapid transportation in diverse environments for pipeline inspection and firefighting. This PFLA combines biomimetic principles with sophisticated fluidic actuation to achieve long‐distance, flexible, precise, and safe actuation, offering a more adaptive solution for force/motion transmission, particularly in challenging environments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Soft Robotics and Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechatronic Engineering and Automation Shanghai University Shanghai 200444 China
School of Computer Engineering and Science Shanghai University Shanghai 200444 China
Funding
Shanghai Rising-Star Program · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/molecules2819675210.3390/molecules28196752 ↗
2. 10.1038/srep2736610.1038/srep27366 ↗
3. 10.1038/ncomms1398110.1038/ncomms13981 ↗
4. 10.1089/soro.2019.001510.1089/soro.2019.0015 ↗
5. 10.1038/ncomms228010.1038/ncomms2280 ↗
6. 10.1109/LRA.2017.272611310.1109/LRA.2017.2726113 ↗
7. S.Joe H.Wang M.Totaro L.Beccai in2020 3rd IEEE International Conference on Soft Rob. (RoboSoft) IEEE 2020 27–32.10.1109/RoboSoft48309.2020.9116044 ↗
8. Chen H. · IEEE Robot. Automat. Lett. · 2023
9. 10.1016/j.sna.2021.11257810.1016/j.sna.2021.112578 ↗
10. 10.1089/soro.2018.003410.1089/soro.2018.0034 ↗
11. Liu C. · IEEE Robot. Automat. Lett. · 2024
12. 10.1088/1748-3182/9/1/01600710.1088/1748-3182/9/1/016007 ↗
13. 10.1126/sciadv.abm783410.1126/sciadv.abm7834 ↗
14. 10.1039/D1MH00457C10.1039/D1MH00457C ↗
15. 10.1126/scirobotics.abe292210.1126/scirobotics.abe2922 ↗
16. H.Tsukagoshi N.Arai I.Kiryu A.Kitagawa in2011 IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Automat. IEEE 2011 pp.1720–1725.10.1109/ICRA.2011.5980564 ↗
17. 10.1109/37.83363810.1109/37.833638 ↗
18. 10.1109/70.48175310.1109/70.481753 ↗
19. 10.1080/01691864.2012.68972210.1080/01691864.2012.689722 ↗
20. 10.1002/aisy.20220009010.1002/aisy.202200090 ↗
21. 10.1073/pnas.171345011410.1073/pnas.1713450114 ↗
22. Z.Zhang W.Fan G.Chen J.Luo Q.Lu H.Wang in2021 IEEE 4th Int. Conf. Soft Rob. (RoboSoft) IEEE 2021 pp.551–554.10.1109/RoboSoft51838.2021.9479194 ↗
23. 10.1126/sciadv.adi713310.1126/sciadv.adi7133 ↗
24. 10.1177/027836492090377410.1177/0278364920903774 ↗
25. 10.1126/scirobotics.adi590810.1126/scirobotics.adi5908 ↗
26. 10.1126/scirobotics.aan302810.1126/scirobotics.aan3028 ↗
27. H.Godaba F.Putzu T.Abrar J.Konstantinova K.Althoefer inTow. Autonom. Robot. Syst.: 20th Ann. Conf. TAROS 2019 London UK Springer 2019 pp.383–394.10.1007/978-3-030-25332-5_33 ↗
28. F.Putzu T.Abrar K.Althoefer in2018 7th IEEE Int. Con. Biomed. Robot. Biomechatron. (Biorob) IEEE 2018 pp.1327–1332.10.1109/BIOROB.2018.8487848 ↗
29. E. DelDottore A.Sadeghi A.Mondini B.Mazzolai in2018 IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Automat. (ICRA) IEEE 2018 3454–3460.10.1109/ICRA.2018.8460616 ↗
30. 10.1089/soro.2016.008010.1089/soro.2016.0080 ↗
31. 10.18178/ijmerr.6.5.373-37710.18178/ijmerr.6.5.373-377 ↗
32. 10.1126/scirobotics.aaz049210.1126/scirobotics.aaz0492 ↗
33. L.Wang T.Akagi S.Dohta T.Kawasaki inThe 2012 Int. Conf. Adv. Mechatron. Syst. IEEE 2012 pp.75–80.10.1109/MIS.2012.100 ↗
34. K.Wakana H.Namari M.Konyo S.Tadokoro in2013 IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Automat. IEEE 2013 pp.357–363.10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630600 ↗
35. Z. M.Hammond N. S.Usevitch E. W.Hawkes S.Follmer in2017 IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Automat. (ICRA) IEEE 2017 pp.626–633.10.1109/ICRA.2017.7989078 ↗
36. Y.Mori H.Tsukagoshi A.Kitagawa in2010 IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Automat. IEEE 2010 pp.3266–3272.10.1109/ROBOT.2010.5509577 ↗
37. 10.1242/jeb.203.17.258910.1242/jeb.203.17.2589 ↗
38. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb00823.x10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb00823.x ↗
39. 10.20965/jrm.2011.p021510.20965/jrm.2011.p0215 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.sna.2018.08.03010.1016/j.sna.2018.08.030 ↗
41. 10.1109/TMECH.2020.299946710.1109/TMECH.2020.2999467 ↗
42. 10.5194/ms-9-51-201810.5194/ms-9-51-2018 ↗
43. 10.1089/soro.2019.008310.1089/soro.2019.0083 ↗
44. J.Luong P.Glick A.Ong M. S.DeVries S.Sandin E. W.Hawkes M. T.Tolley in2019 2nd IEEE Int. Conf. Soft Rob. (RoboSoft) IEEE 2019 pp.801–807.10.1109/ROBOSOFT.2019.8722730 ↗
45. M.Coad L.Blumenschein S.Cutler J.Zepeda N.Naclerio H.El‐Hussieny U.Mehmood J.Ryu E.Hawkes A.Okamura arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.00069.
46. 10.1089/soro.2019.002510.1089/soro.2019.0025 ↗
47. 10.1073/pnas.220177611910.1073/pnas.2201776119 ↗
48. A. K.Mishra F.Tramacere B.Mazzolai in2018 IEEE Int. Conf. Soft Rob. (RoboSoft) IEEE 2018 71–76.10.1109/ROBOSOFT.2018.8404899 ↗
49. 10.1371/journal.pone.009013910.1371/journal.pone.0090139 ↗