Grain Boundaries Control Lithiation of Solid Solution Substrates in Lithium Metal Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The development of sustainable transportation and communication systems requires an increase in both energy density and capacity retention of Li‐batteries. Using substrates forming a solid solution with body‐centered cubic Li enhances the cycle stability of anode‐less batteries. However, it remains unclear how the substrate microstructure affects the lithiation behavior. Here, a correlative, near‐atomic scale probing approach is deployed through combined ion‐ and electron‐microscopy to examine the distribution of Li in Li‐Ag diffusion couples as model system mimicking high current densities. It is revealed that Li regions with over 93.8% at.% nucleate within Ag at random high‐angle grain boundaries, whereas grain interiors are not lithiated. The role of kinetics and mechanical constraint from the microstructure over equilibrium thermodynamics in dictating the lithiation process is evidenced. The findings suggest that grain size and grain boundary character are critical to enhance the electrochemical performance of interlayers/electrodes, particularly for improving lithiation kinetics and hence reducing dendrite formation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Extraction and Separation Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Sustainable Materials 40237 Düsseldorf Germany
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Pukyong National University 45 Yongso‐ro, Nam‐gu Busan 48513 Republic of Korea
GTT‐Technologies 52134 Herzogenrath Germany
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Korea University Seoul 02841 Republic of Korea
Department of Materials Imperial College London London SW7 2AZ UK
Funding
Pukyong National University
References (89)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nchem.208510.1038/nchem.2085 ↗
2. 10.1039/C7CS00863E10.1039/C7CS00863E ↗
3. 10.1002/aenm.20190016110.1002/aenm.201900161 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00887-410.1016/S0378-7753(01)00887-4 ↗
5. European Comission Battery supply chain challenges 2021 https://rmis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/analysis‐of‐supply‐chain‐challenges‐49b749(accessed: June 2024).
6. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0011510.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00115 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c0430210.1021/acs.chemmater.1c04302 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.aay867210.1126/science.aay8672 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0230610.1021/acsenergylett.9b02306 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0212710.1021/acsenergylett.1c02127 ↗
11. 10.1021/jacs.0c0181110.1021/jacs.0c01811 ↗
12. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.1010.1038/nenergy.2016.10 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41560-023-01219-610.1038/s41560-023-01219-6 ↗
14. 10.1002/aenm.20190399310.1002/aenm.201903993 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41560-020-0575-z10.1038/s41560-020-0575-z ↗
16. 10.1007/s11661-018-4567-610.1007/s11661-018-4567-6 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10853-013-7943-z10.1007/s10853-013-7943-z ↗
18. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.05.01410.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.05.014 ↗
19. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.11910.1038/nenergy.2017.119 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0045510.1021/acsenergylett.3c00455 ↗
21. R.Gauthier B.Scott J.Craig Bennett M. N.Obrovac The amorphization of crystalline silicon by ball milling https://ssrn.com/abstract=4501173(accessed: August 2024).10.2139/ssrn.4501173 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0412710.1021/acsaem.1c04127 ↗
23. 10.1038/s43586-021-00047-w10.1038/s43586-021-00047-w ↗
24. 10.1007/978-1-4614-3436-810.1007/978-1-4614-3436-8 ↗
25. 10.1039/D1TA10050E10.1039/D1TA10050E ↗
26. 10.1126/sciadv.abf056310.1126/sciadv.abf0563 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.01310.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.013 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.8b1575810.1021/acsami.8b15758 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0369010.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03690 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsami.7b1468010.1021/acsami.7b14680 ↗
31. 10.1002/smll.20210522510.1002/smll.202105225 ↗
32. 10.1093/micmic/ozad12010.1093/micmic/ozad120 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.07.05210.1016/j.actamat.2019.07.052 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11728110.1016/j.actamat.2021.117281 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.07.00310.1016/j.actamat.2018.07.003 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.09.03410.1016/j.actamat.2019.09.034 ↗
37. P.Lejcek Grain Boundary Segregation in Metals Springer Science & Business Media 2010 https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐3‐642‐12505‐810.1007/978-3-642-12505-8 ↗
38. 10.1002/smll.20200486810.1002/smll.202004868 ↗
39. 10.1016/S1359-6462(00)00699-010.1016/S1359-6462(00)00699-0 ↗
40. 10.1007/s10853-009-3278-110.1007/s10853-009-3278-1 ↗
41. 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00020-810.1016/S1359-6454(99)00020-8 ↗
42. 10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00329-910.1016/S1359-6462(02)00329-9 ↗
43. 10.1080/1478643700823842610.1080/14786437008238426 ↗
44. 10.1179/02670830110151008710.1179/026708301101510087 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.05.04410.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.05.044 ↗
46. 10.34133/energymatadv.010810.34133/energymatadv.0108 ↗
47. 10.1149/2.020203jes10.1149/2.020203jes ↗
48. 10.1002/adma.20120274410.1002/adma.201202744 ↗
49. 10.1016/0001-6160(79)90085-310.1016/0001-6160(79)90085-3 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.05110.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.051 ↗
51. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00077-910.1016/S1359-6454(98)00077-9 ↗
52. 10.1002/srin.19910045110.1002/srin.199100451 ↗
53. 10.1007/BF0266424410.1007/BF02664244 ↗
54. 10.1080/1478643700822093910.1080/14786437008220939 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.mtla.2018.10018910.1016/j.mtla.2018.100189 ↗
56. Humphreys F. J. · 2004
57. 10.1007/BF0258620910.1007/BF02586209 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.01.01810.1016/j.msea.2014.01.018 ↗
59. 10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00336-910.1016/S1359-6454(96)00336-9 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.mtla.2021.10123610.1016/j.mtla.2021.101236 ↗
61. 10.1063/1.172958110.1063/1.1729581 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.02110.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.021 ↗
63. 10.1016/0001-6160(83)90077-910.1016/0001-6160(83)90077-9 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.11.00110.1016/j.actamat.2019.11.001 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.09.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.09.002 ↗
66. 10.1126/sciadv.aau924510.1126/sciadv.aau9245 ↗
67. 10.1126/sciadv.abi552010.1126/sciadv.abi5520 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.07.00410.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.07.004 ↗
69. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c0072010.1021/acs.nanolett.3c00720 ↗
70. 10.1002/aenm.20230296010.1002/aenm.202302960 ↗
71. 10.1038/nmat306510.1038/nmat3065 ↗
72. 10.1016/0965-9773(95)00195-610.1016/0965-9773(95)00195-6 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.00710.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.007 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.00410.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.004 ↗
75. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0213210.1021/acsenergylett.3c02132 ↗
76. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.05360310.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.053603 ↗
77. 10.1038/s41563-021-01019-x10.1038/s41563-021-01019-x ↗
78. 10.1002/aenm.20230294510.1002/aenm.202302945 ↗
79. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0636710.1021/acsnano.1c06367 ↗
80. 10.1002/aenm.20210215110.1002/aenm.202102151 ↗
81. 10.1038/s41586-021-04343-z10.1038/s41586-021-04343-z ↗
82. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.03.02110.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.03.021 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.13970510.1016/j.msea.2020.139705 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.06.00810.1016/j.ultramic.2006.06.008 ↗
85. 10.1371/journal.pone.020921110.1371/journal.pone.0209211 ↗
86. 10.1038/s41598-018-28452-410.1038/s41598-018-28452-4 ↗
87. 10.1093/jmicro/dfx09110.1093/jmicro/dfx091 ↗
88. L.Schemmann The inheritance of different microstructures found after hot rolling on the properties of a completely annealed DP‐steel RWTH Aachen University2015.
89. 10.1016/j.matchar.2019.11007410.1016/j.matchar.2019.110074 ↗