journal article·2025-01Open access

Grain Boundaries Control Lithiation of Solid Solution Substrates in Lithium Metal Batteries

Leonardo Shoji Aota, Chanwon Jung, Siyuan Zhang, Ömer K. Büyükuslu, Aparna Saksena, Ezgi Hatipoglu, Poonam Yadav, Mahander Pratap Singh, Xinren Chen, Eric Woods, Christina Scheu, Se‐Ho Kim, Dierk Raabe, Baptiste Gault

Advanced Science· Volume 12· Issue 4

Abstract

Abstract The development of sustainable transportation and communication systems requires an increase in both energy density and capacity retention of Li‐batteries. Using substrates forming a solid solution with body‐centered cubic Li enhances the cycle stability of anode‐less batteries. However, it remains unclear how the substrate microstructure affects the lithiation behavior. Here, a correlative, near‐atomic scale probing approach is deployed through combined ion‐ and electron‐microscopy to examine the distribution of Li in Li‐Ag diffusion couples as model system mimicking high current densities. It is revealed that Li regions with over 93.8% at.% nucleate within Ag at random high‐angle grain boundaries, whereas grain interiors are not lithiated. The role of kinetics and mechanical constraint from the microstructure over equilibrium thermodynamics in dictating the lithiation process is evidenced. The findings suggest that grain size and grain boundary character are critical to enhance the electrochemical performance of interlayers/electrodes, particularly for improving lithiation kinetics and hence reducing dendrite formation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Extraction and Separation Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Max Planck Institute for Sustainable Materials 40237 Düsseldorf Germany

Department of Materials Science and Engineering Pukyong National University 45 Yongso‐ro, Nam‐gu Busan 48513 Republic of Korea

GTT‐Technologies 52134 Herzogenrath Germany

Department of Materials Science and Engineering Korea University Seoul 02841 Republic of Korea

Department of Materials Imperial College London London SW7 2AZ UK

Funding

Pukyong National University

References (89)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nchem.208510.1038/nchem.2085 ↗
2. 10.1039/C7CS00863E10.1039/C7CS00863E ↗
3. 10.1002/aenm.20190016110.1002/aenm.201900161 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00887-410.1016/S0378-7753(01)00887-4 ↗
5. European Comission Battery supply chain challenges 2021 https://rmis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/analysis‐of‐supply‐chain‐challenges‐49b749(accessed: June 2024).
6. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0011510.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00115 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c0430210.1021/acs.chemmater.1c04302 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.aay867210.1126/science.aay8672 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0230610.1021/acsenergylett.9b02306 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0212710.1021/acsenergylett.1c02127 ↗
11. 10.1021/jacs.0c0181110.1021/jacs.0c01811 ↗
12. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.1010.1038/nenergy.2016.10 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41560-023-01219-610.1038/s41560-023-01219-6 ↗
14. 10.1002/aenm.20190399310.1002/aenm.201903993 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41560-020-0575-z10.1038/s41560-020-0575-z ↗
16. 10.1007/s11661-018-4567-610.1007/s11661-018-4567-6 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10853-013-7943-z10.1007/s10853-013-7943-z ↗
18. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.05.01410.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.05.014 ↗
19. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.11910.1038/nenergy.2017.119 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0045510.1021/acsenergylett.3c00455 ↗
21. R.Gauthier B.Scott J.Craig Bennett M. N.Obrovac The amorphization of crystalline silicon by ball milling https://ssrn.com/abstract=4501173(accessed: August 2024).10.2139/ssrn.4501173 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0412710.1021/acsaem.1c04127 ↗
23. 10.1038/s43586-021-00047-w10.1038/s43586-021-00047-w ↗
24. 10.1007/978-1-4614-3436-810.1007/978-1-4614-3436-8 ↗
25. 10.1039/D1TA10050E10.1039/D1TA10050E ↗
26. 10.1126/sciadv.abf056310.1126/sciadv.abf0563 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.01310.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.013 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.8b1575810.1021/acsami.8b15758 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0369010.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03690 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsami.7b1468010.1021/acsami.7b14680 ↗
31. 10.1002/smll.20210522510.1002/smll.202105225 ↗
32. 10.1093/micmic/ozad12010.1093/micmic/ozad120 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.07.05210.1016/j.actamat.2019.07.052 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11728110.1016/j.actamat.2021.117281 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.07.00310.1016/j.actamat.2018.07.003 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.09.03410.1016/j.actamat.2019.09.034 ↗
37. P.Lejcek Grain Boundary Segregation in Metals Springer Science & Business Media 2010 https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐3‐642‐12505‐810.1007/978-3-642-12505-8 ↗
38. 10.1002/smll.20200486810.1002/smll.202004868 ↗
39. 10.1016/S1359-6462(00)00699-010.1016/S1359-6462(00)00699-0 ↗
40. 10.1007/s10853-009-3278-110.1007/s10853-009-3278-1 ↗
41. 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00020-810.1016/S1359-6454(99)00020-8 ↗
42. 10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00329-910.1016/S1359-6462(02)00329-9 ↗
43. 10.1080/1478643700823842610.1080/14786437008238426 ↗
44. 10.1179/02670830110151008710.1179/026708301101510087 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.05.04410.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.05.044 ↗
46. 10.34133/energymatadv.010810.34133/energymatadv.0108 ↗
47. 10.1149/2.020203jes10.1149/2.020203jes ↗
48. 10.1002/adma.20120274410.1002/adma.201202744 ↗
49. 10.1016/0001-6160(79)90085-310.1016/0001-6160(79)90085-3 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.05110.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.051 ↗
51. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00077-910.1016/S1359-6454(98)00077-9 ↗
52. 10.1002/srin.19910045110.1002/srin.199100451 ↗
53. 10.1007/BF0266424410.1007/BF02664244 ↗
54. 10.1080/1478643700822093910.1080/14786437008220939 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.mtla.2018.10018910.1016/j.mtla.2018.100189 ↗
56. Humphreys F. J. · 2004
57. 10.1007/BF0258620910.1007/BF02586209 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.01.01810.1016/j.msea.2014.01.018 ↗
59. 10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00336-910.1016/S1359-6454(96)00336-9 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.mtla.2021.10123610.1016/j.mtla.2021.101236 ↗
61. 10.1063/1.172958110.1063/1.1729581 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.02110.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.021 ↗
63. 10.1016/0001-6160(83)90077-910.1016/0001-6160(83)90077-9 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.11.00110.1016/j.actamat.2019.11.001 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.09.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.09.002 ↗
66. 10.1126/sciadv.aau924510.1126/sciadv.aau9245 ↗
67. 10.1126/sciadv.abi552010.1126/sciadv.abi5520 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.07.00410.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.07.004 ↗
69. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c0072010.1021/acs.nanolett.3c00720 ↗
70. 10.1002/aenm.20230296010.1002/aenm.202302960 ↗
71. 10.1038/nmat306510.1038/nmat3065 ↗
72. 10.1016/0965-9773(95)00195-610.1016/0965-9773(95)00195-6 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.00710.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.007 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.00410.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.004 ↗
75. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0213210.1021/acsenergylett.3c02132 ↗
76. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.05360310.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.053603 ↗
77. 10.1038/s41563-021-01019-x10.1038/s41563-021-01019-x ↗
78. 10.1002/aenm.20230294510.1002/aenm.202302945 ↗
79. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0636710.1021/acsnano.1c06367 ↗
80. 10.1002/aenm.20210215110.1002/aenm.202102151 ↗
81. 10.1038/s41586-021-04343-z10.1038/s41586-021-04343-z ↗
82. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.03.02110.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.03.021 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.13970510.1016/j.msea.2020.139705 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.06.00810.1016/j.ultramic.2006.06.008 ↗
85. 10.1371/journal.pone.020921110.1371/journal.pone.0209211 ↗
86. 10.1038/s41598-018-28452-410.1038/s41598-018-28452-4 ↗
87. 10.1093/jmicro/dfx09110.1093/jmicro/dfx091 ↗
88. L.Schemmann The inheritance of different microstructures found after hot rolling on the properties of a completely annealed DP‐steel RWTH Aachen University2015.
89. 10.1016/j.matchar.2019.11007410.1016/j.matchar.2019.110074 ↗