journal article·2024-06Open access

Structural Differences at Quadruplex‐Duplex Interfaces Enable Ligand‐Induced Topological Transitions

Yoanes Maria Vianney, Dorothea Dierks, Klaus Weisz

Advanced Science· Volume 11· Issue 24

Abstract

Abstract Quadruplex‐duplex (QD) junctions, which represent unique structural motifs of both biological and technological significance, have been shown to constitute high‐affinity binding sites for various ligands. A QD hybrid construct based on a human telomeric sequence, which harbors a duplex stem‐loop in place of a short lateral loop, is structurally characterized by NMR. It folds into two major species with a (3+1) hybrid and a chair‐type (2+2) antiparallel quadruplex domain coexisting in a K+ buffer solution. The antiparallel species is stabilized by an unusual capping structure involving a thymine and protonated adenine base AH+ of the lateral loop facing the hairpin duplex to form a T·AH+·G·C quartet with the interfacial G·C base pair at neutral pH. Addition and binding of Phen‐DC3 to the QD hybrid mixture by its partial intercalation at corresponding QD junctions leads to a topological transition with exclusive formation of the (3+1) hybrid fold. In agreement with the available experimental data, such an unprecedented discrimination of QD junctions by a ligand can be rationalized following an induced fit mechanism.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry · RNA Interference and Gene Delivery · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institut für Biochemie Universität Greifswald Felix‐Hausdorff‐Str. 4 D‐17489 Greifswald Germany

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41580-020-0236-x10.1038/s41580-020-0236-x ↗
2. 10.1016/S1074-5521(98)90006-010.1016/S1074-5521(98)90006-0 ↗
3. 10.1002/cbic.20030079410.1002/cbic.200300794 ↗
4. 10.1002/chem.20070125510.1002/chem.200701255 ↗
5. 10.1039/C9CC09107F10.1039/C9CC09107F ↗
6. 10.1038/ncomms1443210.1038/ncomms14432 ↗
7. 10.1021/acssensors.2c0099210.1021/acssensors.2c00992 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b0183510.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01835 ↗
9. 10.1093/nar/gkt78410.1093/nar/gkt784 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c0033710.1021/acs.accounts.2c00337 ↗
11. Liu W. · Nucleic Acids Res. · 2019 · 47
12. 10.1093/nar/gkab33010.1093/nar/gkab330 ↗
13. 10.1093/nar/gkac18210.1093/nar/gkac182 ↗
14. 10.1093/nar/gkac108810.1093/nar/gkac1088 ↗
15. 10.1002/chem.20210371810.1002/chem.202103718 ↗
16. 10.1002/chem.20200354010.1002/chem.202003540 ↗
17. 10.1021/jacs.2c0477510.1021/jacs.2c04775 ↗
18. 10.1002/anie.20210625610.1002/anie.202106256 ↗
19. 10.1002/chem.20200502610.1002/chem.202005026 ↗
20. 10.1093/nar/gkv35510.1093/nar/gkv355 ↗
21. 10.1093/nar/gkaa75210.1093/nar/gkaa752 ↗
22. 10.1093/nar/gkad01410.1093/nar/gkad014 ↗
23. 10.1021/ja507881610.1021/ja5078816 ↗
24. 10.1002/anie.20190537210.1002/anie.201905372 ↗
25. 10.1021/bi900748410.1021/bi9007484 ↗
26. 10.1002/anie.20130299510.1002/anie.201302995 ↗
27. 10.1021/jacs.8b0533210.1021/jacs.8b05332 ↗
28. 10.1093/nar/gkac54910.1093/nar/gkac549 ↗
29. 10.1021/ja00097a06610.1021/ja00097a066 ↗
30. 10.1093/nar/gkv29610.1093/nar/gkv296 ↗
31. 10.1002/anie.20150401410.1002/anie.201504014 ↗
32. 10.1002/anie.20160918410.1002/anie.201609184 ↗
33. 10.1261/rna.067470.11810.1261/rna.067470.118 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.biochi.2023.08.00210.1016/j.biochi.2023.08.002 ↗
35. 10.1039/C8SC03813A10.1039/C8SC03813A ↗
36. 10.1002/cbic.20180009910.1002/cbic.201800099 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.12.00810.1016/j.bbagen.2016.12.008 ↗
38. 10.1093/nar/gkt77110.1093/nar/gkt771 ↗
39. 10.1002/anie.20180466710.1002/anie.201804667 ↗
40. 10.1002/anie.20220738410.1002/anie.202207384 ↗
41. 10.1093/nar/gkz123510.1093/nar/gkz1235 ↗