Morphogenic Modeling of Corrosion Reveals Complex Effects of Intermetallic Particles
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Corrosion processes are often discussed as stochastic events. Here, it is shown that some of these seemingly random processes are not driven by nanoscopic fluctuations but rather by the spatial distribution of micrometer‐scale heterogeneities that trigger fast reactions associated with corrosion. Using a novel excitable reaction‐diffusion model, corrosion waves traveling over the metal surface and the associated material loss are described. This resulting nonuniform corrosion penetration, seen as a height loss in modeling, exposes buried intermetallic particles, which depending on the local electrochemical state of the surface trigger or block new waves. Informed by quantitative experimental data for the Mg–Al–Zn alloy AZ31B, wave speeds, wave widths, and average material loss are accurately captured. Morphogenic mitigation based on wave‐breaking microparticles is also simulated. While AZ31B corrosion is identified as a process driven by rare‐wave events, this study predicts several other corrosion regimes that proceed via spots or patchy patterns, opening the door for new protection, design, and prediction strategies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms · Material Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Florida State University Tallahassee FL 32306 USA
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Center for Electrochemical Science and Engineering University of Virginia Charlottesville VA 22904 USA
Department of Chemistry Saint Louis University 3501 Laclede Ave. St. Louis MO 63103 USA
Funding
Defense Sciences Office, DARPA
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry‐analysis/magnesium‐alloys‐market(accessed: May 2024).
2. 10.1038/s41467-024-45120-610.1038/s41467-024-45120-6 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41467-024-44802-510.1038/s41467-024-44802-5 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41563-021-00920-910.1038/s41563-021-00920-9 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41563-019-0439-810.1038/s41563-019-0439-8 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41563-019-0579-x10.1038/s41563-019-0579-x ↗
7. 10.5006/362510.5006/3625 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41467-023-36588-910.1038/s41467-023-36588-9 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.corsci.2023.11142810.1016/j.corsci.2023.111428 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.mser.2023.10074610.1016/j.mser.2023.100746 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.13020910.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.130209 ↗
12. Krischer K. · Adv. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. · 2002 · 8 · 89
13. 10.1063/1.221415510.1063/1.2214155 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41467-022-32282-410.1038/s41467-022-32282-4 ↗
15. 10.1039/b009425k10.1039/b009425k ↗
16. 10.1039/C8SM01928B10.1039/C8SM01928B ↗
17. 10.1085/jgp.7.4.47310.1085/jgp.7.4.473 ↗
18. 10.1021/jp002237n10.1021/jp002237n ↗
19. Winfree A. T. · 2000
20. 10.7554/eLife.8718110.7554/eLife.87181 ↗
21. 10.1038/225535a010.1038/225535a0 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.301310.1103/PhysRevLett.65.3013 ↗
23. 10.1002/anie.20080048010.1002/anie.200800480 ↗
24. 10.1149/1.291890010.1149/1.2918900 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.corsci.2022.11047710.1016/j.corsci.2022.110477 ↗
26. 10.1149/1.208559510.1149/1.2085595 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.02.06610.1016/j.electacta.2008.02.066 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.01.06510.1016/j.electacta.2009.01.065 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.corsci.2005.05.02110.1016/j.corsci.2005.05.021 ↗
30. 10.1016/0010-938X(92)90149-W10.1016/0010-938X(92)90149-W ↗
31. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.05.04910.1016/j.electacta.2010.05.049 ↗
32. Melia M. A. · J. Magnesium Alloys · 2017 · 69 · 2322
33. 10.1016/j.jma.2014.01.00410.1016/j.jma.2014.01.004 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.elecom.2017.10.00110.1016/j.elecom.2017.10.001 ↗
35. 10.5006/363410.5006/3634 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.01110.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.011 ↗
37. 10.1149/1.352322910.1149/1.3523229 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.02110.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.021 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.corsci.2019.04.02410.1016/j.corsci.2019.04.024 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.corsci.2019.02.02610.1016/j.corsci.2019.02.026 ↗
41. 10.1149/2.0541506jes10.1149/2.0541506jes ↗
42. 10.1149/1.186998410.1149/1.1869984 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.01110.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.011 ↗
44. 10.5006/125710.5006/1257 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.03.13310.1016/j.electacta.2014.03.133 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.11810.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.118 ↗
47. 10.5006/442010.5006/4420 ↗
48. 10.1002/(SICI)1527-2648(199909)1:1<11::AID-ADEM11>3.0.CO;2-N10.1002/(SICI)1527-2648(199909)1:1<11::AID-ADEM11>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
49. 10.1002/adem.20031040510.1002/adem.200310405 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jma.2013.09.00310.1016/j.jma.2013.09.003 ↗
51. 10.1038/srep2874710.1038/srep28747 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.corsci.2018.10.03910.1016/j.corsci.2018.10.039 ↗
53. 10.1149/2.1371706jes10.1149/2.1371706jes ↗
54. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.01110.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.011 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jma.2019.12.00110.1016/j.jma.2019.12.001 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jma.2020.11.02210.1016/j.jma.2020.11.022 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jmst.2019.02.00410.1016/j.jmst.2019.02.004 ↗
58. 10.1126/science.110135810.1126/science.1101358 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.corsci.2009.11.00610.1016/j.corsci.2009.11.006 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.06.03610.1016/j.electacta.2013.06.036 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.elecom.2013.08.02310.1016/j.elecom.2013.08.023 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.corsci.2013.01.01710.1016/j.corsci.2013.01.017 ↗
63. 10.1109/TETCI.2019.295290810.1109/TETCI.2019.2952908 ↗
64. 10.1073/pnas.211756811910.1073/pnas.2117568119 ↗
65. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-204010.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-2040 ↗
66. 10.1038/s41467-019-08999-010.1038/s41467-019-08999-0 ↗
67. 10.5006/145910.5006/1459 ↗
68. 10.1016/0167-2789(91)90194-E10.1016/0167-2789(91)90194-E ↗
69. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.16410.1103/PhysRevLett.72.164 ↗
70. 10.1149/2.0621507jes10.1149/2.0621507jes ↗
71. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.08.04010.1016/j.msea.2018.08.040 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.01.06910.1016/j.electacta.2004.01.069 ↗